Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This guideline contains conventions on how to name Wikipedia articles about peoples, ethnicities, and tribes. It should be read in conjunction with Wikipedia's general policy on article naming. This guideline explains how to handle cases where this format is not obvious, or for one reason or other is not followed.

General conventions and disambiguation

There are several acceptable conventions for naming articles about ethnic groups. When deciding how to name such an article, consider the

concise title will be a plural demonym, e.g. Bretons or Swedes. Note that in some cases, the common plural form is a mass noun
that is the same as the singular form, as with Batak, Cherokee, or Wodaabe.

In cases where no plural demonym exists, or where that demonym is ambiguous and not the

parenthetical disambiguation will be necessary, especially when there are more than one ethnic group that share a name. Add a distinguishing term in parentheses after the common name. For example, Gavião (Jê) and Gavião (Rondônia) distinguish the two peoples from each other and other topics named Gavião
.

Examples of use on the English Wikipedia are provided below:

Pattern Examples
Plural demonym Koreans · Germans · Swedes · Arab Canadians
Mass noun demonyms British Chinese · Iyer · Navajo
Adjectival with "people"
Wauja people
Adjectival with "peoples" Circumpolar peoples · Turkic peoples
Parenthetical disambiguation
Macedonians (ethnic group)

Terms to watch

Tribes

Indigenous Canadian
groups are defined primarily by citizenship. It is not a racial designation. The term "tribe" or "tribal nation" is only appropriate in Wikipedia titles if that is the official name for the group in question. Follow the naming conventions used in quality, well-sourced articles, and in the sources produced by the people, tribe, band, or nation in question. For instance:

Reservations and Reserves

Naming conventions: Native, Indigenous, Indian, etc

  • "Native American", "Indian", and "Indigenous" are all capitalized when referring to individuals and their citizenship.[a]
  • These are terms of citizenship, not race. (For Wikipedia guidelines, see
    MOS:CITIZEN
    .)
  • Terminology varies by both generation and region. While some editors try to remove "Indian" from Wikipedia, it is still used in the official titles of many Indigenous groups, such as the American Indian College Fund and Indian Country Today. It is also the personal terminology preferred by some Indigenous individuals.
  • Most Indigenous people prefer to be identified by their specific nation or tribe, rather than an umbrella term. The most common form is to link this in a parenthetic or clause after their name. Example: Joy Harjo (Muscogee Nation). Less common, but useful when including more information, Joy Harjo, Muscogee Nation citizen and United States Poet Laureate.
  • Native American in most Wikipedia articles and categories refers to the Indigenous peoples of the United States, so American Indians, Alaska Natives, optionally Native Hawaiians, and optionally Indigenous people of territories of the United States, such as Guam and American Samoa.
  • First Nations refers to the Indigenous peoples in Canada who are not Inuit or Métis.

For guidelines on writing about Indigenous identity on Wikipedia, especially in BLPs, see

this section with examples
.

Singular titles

Use of the singular titles for ethnic groups is generally deprecated in favor of plural titles. Notably, a October–November 2015 request for comment determined that articles about American ethnic groups, which had largely used singular titles, such as African American and Chinese American, should use titles rendered in the plural, e.g. African Americans and Chinese Americans. Note that mass nouns may be the same as the singular form; these are acceptable if they are the common name.

Other

Forms that require a

definite article
should not be used, e.g. French people is used instead of The French. Gendered terminology should also be avoided, e.g. English people is used instead of Englishmen.

Self-identification

How the group self-identifies should be considered. If their autonym is commonly used in English, it would be the best article title. Any terms regarded as derogatory by members of the ethnic group in question should be avoided.

Individual self-identification is insufficient to determine Indigenous identity. Confirmation must come from the group in question. See

wp:NDNID
.

Disputes

Disputes over how to refer to a group are addressed by policies such as

wikiproject
.

Notes

  1. ^ Though Indigenous identities are not racial, they are usually treated with the same guidelines as ethnic and racial terms. Here are some style guides and reporter's guidelines: