Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/May 2007

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Wikipedia's

Peer review process exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors, and is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work, often as a way of preparing a featured article candidate. It is not academic peer review
by a group of experts in a particular subject, and articles that undergo this process should not be assumed to have greater authority than any other.

For general editing advice, see

"How to write a great article", and "The perfect article". Articles that need extensive basic editing should be directed to Pages needing attention, Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment
.

The path to a featured article

  1. Start a new article
  2. Research and write a great article
  3. Check against the featured article criteria
  4. Get creative feedback
    1. Automated review
  5. Apply for featured article status
  6. Featured articles

The following peer review suggestions were semi-automatically generated by a

stylistic issues
that peer reviewers may miss or not be aware of.

Creation procedure
Generally, the suggestions will be generated

semi-automatically by User:AZPR, though all users can run the script themselves by following the instructions for installation
.

How to respond to a request
Feel free to strike out issues that have already been taken care of or to respond to problems; questions about issues can be left on this page (which hopefully an editor will notice and respond to) or on the articles

peer review
page.

How to remove a request
Automated reviews for articles that have been closed or archived should be left on this page to keep the links organized.

How to get updated suggestions
A message can be left at
here or here requesting an updated automated review, or you can install the script yourself by following instructions at User:AndyZ/peerreviewer#Installation

Notes
Please see User:AndyZ/peerreviewer/guide for additional information about specific suggestions.

PRs before May

Please search for your article by the TOC on

WP:PRA/A07
). Thanks!

Requests

Robert Benchley

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through

Resurgent insurgent 06:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

1930 FIFA World Cup

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Daviiid 21:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Quatermass

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Daviiid 20:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drexel University College of Law

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mac Pro

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • Avoid misplaced formality: “in order to/for” (-> to/for), “thereupon”, “notwithstanding”,
      etc
      .
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Nakad

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Henry College

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable Content

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): don't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IK Pegasi

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Wogan

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 12 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): hasn't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Motorcycle history

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of Georgia Tech

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Church

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raiders of the Lost Ark

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Delta Theta

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
    [?]
  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Avoid including
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): wasn't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aga Khan II

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • correctly
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 15 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Not Stupid

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), realise (B) (American: realize), criticise (B) (American: criticize), leukemia (A) (British: leukaemia), skillful (A) (British: skilful), program (A) (British: programme).
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Not Stupid Too

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): won't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Dreaming

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), organize (A) (British: organise), recognize (A) (British: recognise), recognise (B) (American: recognize), categorize (A) (British: categorise), ization (A) (British: isation), quarrelled (B) (American: quarreled).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): isn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concord, New Hampshire

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Avoid including
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renaissance

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • As per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Theft Auto (series)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 21 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

50 Cent

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • As per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)
    , avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • Per
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't, Isn't, couldn't, didn't, didn't, couldn't, Don't, don't, wouldn't, didn't, didn't, didn't, doesn't, wasn't, wasn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bud Grant

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Building the World Trade Center

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article may need to undergo
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Police

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: armour (B) (American: armor), behavior (A) (British: behaviour), neighbor (A) (British: neighbour), meter (A) (British: metre), defense (A) (British: defence), organize (A) (British: organise), organise (B) (American: organize), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), grey (B) (American: gray).
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 32 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dugong

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 14 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of ODI Awards for Sachin Tendulkar

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
    [?]
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tantra

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)
    , avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: recognize (A) (British: recognise), realise (B) (American: realize), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization).
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm a Cheerleader

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): Don't, Don't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kung Fu Hustle

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), realize (A) (British: realise), realise (B) (American: realize), criticise (B) (American: criticize), skeptic (A) (British: sceptic).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): don't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Real Madrid

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please convert tables from HTML syntax to Help:Table wiki-markup.
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)
    , avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), honour (B) (American: honor), behavior (A) (British: behaviour), organize (A) (British: organise), criticise (B) (American: criticize), paycheck (A) (British: pay cheque).
  • The article will need references. See
    [?]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flying the Flag (for You)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • As per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): Don't, doesn't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Golf

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
    [?]
  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
    Specifically, an example is 30 ha.
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)
    , avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), behavior (A) (British: behaviour), neighbor (A) (British: neighbour), aluminum (A) (British: aluminium), meter (A) (British: metre), fiber (A) (British: fibre), organise (B) (American: organize), recognize (A) (British: recognise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), orthopedic (A) (British: orthopaedic), any more (B) (American: anymore), grey (B) (American: gray), program (A) (British: programme).
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • “In the year [of] 1297”
    • Avoid misplaced formality: “in order to/for” (-> to/for), “thereupon”, “notwithstanding”,
      etc
      .
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): can't, can't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of the New York Giants (1979-1993)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): Doesn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shared universe

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Master of the Game

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. Louis Cardinals seasons

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of United States Presidential assassination attempts

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vagrant Story

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), armor (A) (British: armour), ization (A) (British: isation), modelling (B) (American: modeling), programme (B) (American: program ), skeptic (A) (British: sceptic).
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 17 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): can't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Bond

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): don't, don't, didn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • correctly
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton, Ontario

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please convert tables from HTML syntax to Help:Table wiki-markup.
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
    Specifically, an example is 30 km.
  • Per
    [?]
  • As per
    [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: harbour (B) (American: harbor), neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), organize (A) (British: organise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), enrollment (A) (British: enrolment), any more (B) (American: anymore), programme (B) (American: program ).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): can't, don't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sale, Greater Manchester

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]

*Per

[?]

 Done
Nev1 16:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): Didn't.
 Done
Nev1 16:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Westgate-on-Sea

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whitstable

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plymouth Colony

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SHPS

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • “In the year [of] 2000”
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado Avalanche

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • As per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice (UK)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclone rainfall forecasting

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)
    , avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Works analogous to Harry Potter

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 18 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): hadn't, doesn't, doesn't, doesn't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. *The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at

[?]

 Done Four paragraphs of the lead moved into the body of the article. Yellowdesk

*The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per

[?]

 Done Solved by the above mentioned move. Yellowdesk

*Per

[?]

 Done Took out "Month Year" wiki links. Looked for solo "year," solo "day," and solo "month" wiki links. Yellowdesk

*Per

[?]

 Done Margaret Chiara photo had no caption. Fixed. Yellowdesk
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)

*Per

[?]

 Done Yellowdesk

*As per

[?]

 Done Changed the "Law reference" section so there were no automated subsections. Now bold text instead.
USA PATRIOT Act was the offending item. This should help the ToC some too. Yellowdesk
  • Per
    [?]
 Not done Changed the "Law reference" section so there were no automated subsections. A start.
Daughter pages under discussion on the article talk page.
Created: out of one section:
Dismissed U.S. attorneys summary. Yellowdesk
Also Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy timeline out of another section.
  • This article may need to undergo
    [?]
  • Under discussion on the article's talk page. See above table of contents items about moving sections out into new articles. Part of the reason for doing the peer review: soliciting advice on breaking up the page. Yellowdesk
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): Won't, Didn't, didn't, don't, can't, doesn't.
  • As done in
    [?]
 Done I think all of these were fixed. -- Yellowdesk 03:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Public Schools Association

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sinhala alphabet

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
     Done
  • As done in
    [?]
     Done
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bill O'Reilly (cricketer)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
    There is an image in the top right of the article, in the infobox. The Rambling Man 07:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
    [?]
    Persondata now added The Rambling Man 11:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per
    [?]
    Done The Rambling Man 07:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per
    [?]
    Done The Rambling Man 10:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't.
    The only instance of a contraction is inside quotations The Rambling Man 10:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • As done in
    [?]
    All footnotes other than the two in the table comply with this style The Rambling Man 08:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
    [?]
    No citations needed - I presume this picked up the "citation" text in the external links... The Rambling Man 08:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]
    Copyedited by User:ALoan. Hurrah. The Rambling Man 12:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Stefani

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article may need to undergo
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. Mary's Church, Lübeck

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • As per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • it has been
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: meter (A) (British: metre), metre (B) (American: meter), organize (A) (British: organise), recognize (A) (British: recognise), criticise (B) (American: criticize), ization (A) (British: isation), program (A) (British: programme).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): would've.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bubbles the Clown

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heian Palace

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
 Done
  • Per
    [?]
 Done: years and centuries link, other dates not
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
 Not done: images of the original palace do not exist, and images of present-day reconstructions would be misleading in the lead section
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
 Not done: no applicable infobox
  • Per
    [?]
 Done
  • Per
    [?]
    Specifically, an example is 1.2 km.
 Done
  • Per
    [?]
 Done
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
 Done
  • As done in
    [?]
 Done
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]
Hopefully careful enough... Stca74 18:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Film Booking Offices of America

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • correctly
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]

*See if possible if there is a

[?]

 Done Infobox image seems to accomplish this. Dlong 04:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Per

[?]

 Done Doesn't seem to apply. Dlong 04:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Per

[?]

 Done Doesn't seem to apply. Dlong 04:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*As per

[?]

 Done Dlong 04:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 21 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): wasn't, didn't, wasn't.
 Done Dlong 04:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • As done in
    [?]
 Done Dlong 04:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1997-98 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): wasn't, wasn't, weren't, wasn't, wouldn't, weren't, wasn't, wasn't, wasn't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

Harry Potter fandom

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): wouldn't, haven't, won't, isn't, weren't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Unsex'd Females

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yellowknife, Northwest Territories

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
    Specifically, an example is 81 km.
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Young (baseball pitcher)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per
    [?]
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Surface weather analysis

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aston Villa F.C.

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • As per
    [?]
  • As per
    [?]
  • Per
    Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)
    , avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
      :The "it has been" was for a reference!(Everlast1910 22:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC))
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Runcorn

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Air Flight 574

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
    Specifically, an example is 1.4 km.
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article may need to undergo
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: aluminum (A) (British: aluminium), metre (B) (American: meter), fiber (A) (British: fibre), criticize (A) (British: criticise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), analyze (A) (British: analyse), traveled (A) (British: travelled), travelled (B) (American: traveled), ageing (B) (American: aging).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't, wasn't, doesn't, can't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Backmasking

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article may need to undergo
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: behavior (A) (British: behaviour), any more (B) (American: anymore), program (A) (British: programme), programme (B) (American: program ), skeptic (A) (British: sceptic).
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): Don't, Don't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Children of Men

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article may need to undergo
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • “In the year [of] 2000”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): doesn't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saving Private Ryan

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • As per
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): wasn't.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BackupHDDVD

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): wasn't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kayastha

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 14 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolph Cartier

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devil May Cry 3 (manga)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): aren't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date cultivation in Dar al-Manasir

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • Consider adding more
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
    Specifically, an example is 1 cm.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • “In the year [of] 2003”
    • Avoid misplaced formality: “in order to/for” (-> to/for), “thereupon”, “notwithstanding”,
      etc
      .
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): don't, can't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • are considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pipe organ

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
Comment: proposed infobox is at
talk) 22:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • Avoid misplaced formality: “in order to/for” (-> to/for), “thereupon”, “notwithstanding”,
      etc
      .
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Winona Ryder

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)
    , avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): don't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Vogler

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • This article has no
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
    [?]
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
    [?]
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vice City

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 33 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protocarnivorous plant

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • are considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Shakespearean characters

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per
    [?]
  • This article may need to undergo
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • This article needs
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planet

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: neighbor (A) (British: neighbour), neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), meter (A) (British: metre), recognize (A) (British: recognise), realize (A) (British: realise), criticise (B) (American: criticize), categorise (B) (American: categorize), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), program (A) (British: programme).
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): won't.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Virginia

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
Done
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
No appropriate infobox
  • Per
    [?]
Done
  • Per
    [?]
Done
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
    [?]
  • Watch for
    redundancy exercises
    .)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
  • See if possible if there is a
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
    [?]
  • There are a few occurrences of
    WP:AWT
    . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
      [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Annika Sörenstam

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
    [?]
    • The first paragraph begins with an audio .ogg file which looks like it hasn't been counted. Three paragraphs should suffice Mudforce 14:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per
    [?]
    • Non context standalone year links removed Mudforce 14:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per
    [?]
    • There is both an image in the infobox and a flag. All other images have captions Mudforce 14:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • There may be an applicable
    [?]
    (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
    • WikiProject Golf recognises two infoboxes. This version is in the process of being made into a template. Mudforce 17:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per
    [?]
  • Per
    [?]
    • years with full dates linked corrected Mudforce 14:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • As per
    [?]
  • This article may need to undergo
    [?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), honour (B) (American: honor), defense (A) (British: defence), defence (B) (American: defense), program (A) (British: programme).
  • As done in
    [?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
    [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    • Thanks for your comments above - the script does not recognize images in infoboxes, but I did not realize the .ogg bug counting paragraphs. Keep up the good work! Ruhrfisch 14:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]