Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 20

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

August 20

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 20, 2022.

Draft:5000 (year)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term in draft space with no history as a draft page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Year 1 kilo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term in draft space with no history as a draft page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

4570s

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 27#4570s

Tarch Maharl

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other than some kind of exaggerated pronunciation, I don't know what this could mean. Without a justification, delete as not useful. MB 21:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Implausible typo. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 08:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 11:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. A Google search only yields mirrors of Wikipedia about various topics that don't include the Taj Mahal. Regards, SONIC678 22:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3000s

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete any that have not been singled out to be kept or some alternative action. In such a large discussion, it would not be fair to delete any that have been objected to. Of course, this is without prejudice against renomination individually or in a small batch. -- Tavix (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Following the closure of Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_11#6100s, I decided to RfD the remaining decades redirects. The vast majority of these decades are not mentioned in any entry of the target, and are not likely to be searched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaundryPizza03 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment "6100s" probably should have been disambiguated. There are several products called "6100" for which "6100s" would be the plural, so 6100 should be a disambig page -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 08:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete the vast majority of these for the reasons I and others gave at the 6100s discussion. There is no mention of any specific decades or centuries at the target so these are not helpful. I would suggest to keep
    6th millennium respectively as, on the one hand these were BLARed without much (if any) discussion so may well be restored, and on the other hand similar redirects were recently kept (Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_January_24#11th_millennium). There may be isolated others in the list that should be kept or retargeted for some other reason and my !vote should not be interpreted as necessarily advocating to delete in those cases. A7V2 (talk) 08:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

XXXIII century

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are 572 redirects to

4th millennium, which in turn got merged to the current target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suisare

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other than a google hit for urban dictionary, I cannot find anyone using suisare to mean party. Furthermore, the urban dictionary definition seems to be from a while ago and hasn't really gained any traction. TartarTorte 21:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2022 evacuation of the Donetsk People's Republic and the Luhansk People's Republics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Typo (extra "s" at the end) left behind from a page move. It is highly unlikely anyone would accidentally add an "s" to "Luhansk People's Republic", a proper name. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: While 2022 evacuation of the Donetsk People's and Luhansk People's Republics is feasible, the plural Republics for Luhansk is pretty implausible when Republic is already there for Donetsk. TartarTorte 21:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: this is a grammatically incorrect typo, and I would be okay with speedy delete. We could create dozens of these for any complex title, but I think there’s no point because the main keywords will still get the reader there. —Michael Z. 21:12, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stonewall Heights

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stonewall Heights is a name a developer tried to name a portion of Kensington, Philadelphia in 2017 that gained no traction anywhere in usage. It's not mentioned at the current target article or at the Kensington, Philadelphia article, furthermore a publicity stunt by a developer is not notable enough to be included on wikipedia; therefore, I recommend deletion. TartarTorte 19:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rural Canada

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

It was an article about rural Canada before being

BLARred, which wasn't necessarily an incorrect decision as the article was in a mostly unsourced and essay like state at the time, but its current target doesn't really have any relevant information on rural Canada as a concept. TartarTorte 19:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Tagging from the page history relevant parties to the discussion (
KH-1) TartarTorte 19:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spellbound Interactive

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect. The company in the target article was based in Germany and never went by "Spellbound Interactive". Conversely, Spellbound Interactive was based in England. The two companies are not related. IceWelder [✉] 18:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Intergenerational ethics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on
"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Intergenerational equity and intergenerational ethics are two quite distinct areas of study – the former is something studied mostly in economics and the latter mostly in

WP:RDEL #10 applies and we're better off deleting this to encourage creation of an article on this topic. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Butter (alchemy)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

I see no articles listed on the target disambiguation page that relate to the use of butter in alchemy (or things in alchemy called butter), nor is there a section with the header, "Alchemy". BD2412 T 04:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and merge the original disambig to Butter (disambiguation). Create a new section called "Chemical compounds" for the two pages in the original disambig. This should resolve most issues related to the redirect. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:DDBB:5FD1:FCB9:EB0C (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Shhhnotsoloud as there is nothing in enwiki on this. Agree with Uanfala that there are no entries worth disambiguating either at the redirect title or the target title. Entries were merged from the alchemy dab to the general dab, which were then removed, hence there is no point in a "re-merge". If this is not going to be deleted, retarget to Antimony trichloride which mentions it was known to alchemists as butter of antimony. Jay 💬 10:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:GAMESOURCES

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Added hatnote to the alternate board and table games page. Jay 💬 09:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since we also have Wikipedia:WikiProject Board and table games/Sources, I think this should become a disambig. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and add a hatnote. There is no reason to break or change the many existing incomming links that clearly intend this target. Thryduulf (talk) 10:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and add a hatnote per Thryduulf. Retargeting or disambiguation would disrupt too many links (30 at the moment, excluding the target page and links related to this RFD) and established shortcut usage to be worth it. This is the project namespace, so users won't be confused just because they have to click a hatnote at the top of the page. Glades12 (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and hatnote. Links from discussions are easy to fix, but we can't change links from edit summaries, and sources lists get lots of use in edit summaries (e.g. "rv, not reliable, see
    WP:GAMESOURCES"). 61.239.39.90 (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arashabbasi

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 27#Arashabbasi

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_20&oldid=1108666610"