Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 20

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

February 20

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 20, 2024.

B-rail

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

I do not think people would search up B-rail for this.

SNCB/NMBS together is more appropriate JuniperChill (talk) 23:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Hui (animal)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous number of redirects for this article. This is not sensible destination for a word that just means 'fox'. PepperBeast (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Due to this edit to merge Canidae in Meitei culture (the target of all the nominated redirects) to Meitei culture as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canidae in Meitei culture (closed to merge), I'm not sure how relevant or applicable some of these votes are now. Steel1943 (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Notwithstanding the moving targets, these terms aren't mentioned now. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand your concerns too. However, these terms were not mentioned now because the nominator didn't bring the particular information to the targeted merged page. One can re-add them at any time. Haoreima (talk) 19:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • ꯃꯨꯊꯠꯄ (which is, according to Google Translate, Manipuri for Delete).
    WP:RLANG) neatly covers all of this. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete. The target was merged to Meitei culture#Animals and birds which mentions story titles having words Loushing and Keishal. However, these needn't be redirects. A search can show if non-English words the reader is looking for is part of any article. Jay 💬 17:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Dada (Ultra monster) and etc.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#Dada (Ultra monster) and etc.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/Years

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 19#Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/Years

Qatar 2023

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Queen of Hearts (talk • stalk • she/they) 22:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

"Qatar 2023" is not unambiguously affiliated with the 2023 AFC Asian Cup and I propose retargeting to 2023 in Qatar. I've tried to change the target, as has another editor (Significa liberdade), and instead of edit warring I'm seeking feedback on this.

It is my belief that "CountryName Year" redirects should be pointed to YYYY in CountryName. I made a similar nomination here, where I nominated a number of CountryName Year redirects. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per above rationale - 🐲 Jo the fire dragon 🐉(talk|contributions) 16:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

List of "Cops/COPS/C.O.P.S." episodes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 29#List of "Cops/COPS/C.O.P.S." episodes

January 6 hostage crisis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading/POV redirect. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see mention of "Jan 6 hostage crisis" in the citations. Could it belong on one of the Trump articles? DN (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget. Some section about Trump's comments (or those of other Republican politicians) about "January 6" might be a better redirect target. Shankar Sivarajan (talk) 18:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Darknipples: Please be aware that your !vote is actually a proposal to "retarget", and not to "refine", as the article you're suggesting is completely different from the present target. CycloneYoris talk! 03:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, retarget, or refine?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk page of the proposed targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No hostages, no crisis. Feoffer (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless there is coverage in sources. The target does talk about "hostages" and exactly that way in quotes. It does not talk about a crisis per Feoffer, and certainly not about a hostage crisis. Jay 💬 18:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not in WP:RS or concluded in articles that the charged/convicted are hostages. IP75 (talk) 20:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

List of Cogs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gear#Types. Given that Cog#Types hasn't been created, the result that makes the most sense is retarget to Gear#Types, where there is a list of cogs. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no list of cogs at the target article. Perhaps in the past (and before the offshoot into

List of Gears of War characters that's currently a redirect), but now this redirect has very little to offer readers. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Philippines Disputed Territories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn/retarget to Territories claimed by the Philippines. No point leaving this here when my nomination rationale was faulty and no-one has supported deletion or anything else. An obvious suitable target does exist. A7V2 (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

There is no discussion of the Philippines at the current target, nor was there when this redirect was created back in 2005 [5]. The Philippines seems to be involved in several territorial disputes, both past and present, and many are listed on

Territorial disputes of the Philippines, but no such article exists. I'm unsure what should be done with this redirect, but given lack of a clear best choice I'm leaning towards delete. Certainly the current target is not suitable. A7V2 (talk) 01:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:R from project

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially ambiguous rcat redirect, considering that {{

R to project}} redirects to {{R to project namespace}}. I'm also not sure that one thing being a project of another thing necessarily implies that the former is a subsidiary of the latter - for example, a person could be said to have a project, but such a project wouldn't be considered a subsidiary of that person. For these reasons, I propose deletion. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 00:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

1792 presidential election

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm looking at the target, and there appears to be exactly one Presidential election in 1792: the 1792 United States presidential election. As such, I don't think this is an ambiguous search term, so I'm bringing it here seeking a retarget. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • information Note: Bundled Presidential election of 1792 into this nomination (courtesy ping Red-tailed hawk). All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 00:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • If there had been other presidential elections in 1792 for which there were articles then at the least these should be refined to the section on 1792, but as that is not the case, retarget to 1792 United States presidential election per nom. A7V2 (talk) 01:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom. Not only do we not have articles about other presidential elections in that year, I can't find any evidence there were others we could have articles about. Eventually, using the search term "1792" "presidential election" -"United States" -Washington -"college" -"US" -"U.S." I got a few hits related to something other than US presidential elections on page 2, these related to a battle in 1792 that The Independent speculated may have some meaning for the 2006 French presidential election, the 2019 Nigerian presidential election (in which one candidate received 1,792 votes), the president of a company called "1792 Wealth Advisors", Marie Antoinette (who was imprisoned in 1792), a list of
    Early Day Motions in the UK House of Commons that includes motion #1792 and a motion related to the 2009 Iranian presidential election and an alternate history wiki. Thryduulf (talk) 04:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_20&oldid=1214535546"