Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 27

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

May 27

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 27, 2024.

Roman Catholid Diocese of Down and Connor

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 3#Roman Catholid Diocese of Down and Connor

Alcohol drinking

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Alcoholic beverage. signed, Rosguill talk 20:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would suggest redirecting this to Alcoholic beverage or maybe Alcohol (drug). Alcohol drinking is not necessarily alcohol intoxication. Mondtaler (talk) 19:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-target to Alcoholic beverage. Alcohol (drug) is more about the medical aspects of alcohol, while Alcoholic beverage gives more information about the cultural aspects of it, with which the act of drinking alcohol itself it more associated. Ca talk to me! 06:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded, re-target to Alcoholic beverage. –Konanen (talk) 11:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the almost-identical point I made at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 17#Soda drinking for the since-deleted redirect Soda drinking almost a decade ago, amongst other issues: 1) The redirect is worded in a way that makes it seem like it leads to a guide about how to drink alcohol, which it does not; 2) There is no guarantee that someone searching this phrase is intending to locate the article Alcoholic beverage, considering Alcohol is a disambiguation page. Readers could be intending to find issues pertaining to ingesting the subjects of the articles Alcohol (chemistry) or Alcohol (drug), neither of which are exclusive to the subject at Alcoholic beverage, considering subjects such as Rubbing alcohol exist; and 3) I also do not believe that retargeting this redirect directly to Alcohol makes sense since the disambiguation page is not exclusively about subjects to related to "alcohol drinking". With all this being said, search results are probably the best for our readers, which can only be accomplished in a user-friendly fashion if this redirect is deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget. I'm actually with Ca and Konanen on this one-- the closest thing we have TO a "guide about how to drink alcohol" as per Steel, is the article we have on alcohol which is meant to be drunk, the history of imbibed alcohol, the various different types of alcohol that one can drink, what one can do while drinking alcohol, and what effects it can have on the human body. All of that can be found (or is linked to) on Alcoholic beverage.
    As for There is no guarantee that someone searching this phrase is intending to locate the article Alcoholic beverage, considering Alcohol is a disambiguation page, I'd say that the word "drinking" in this redirect serves as a good enough disambiguator. Clearly, the one typing this into the search bar is A: looking for an article about alcohol, and B: looking for an article about alcohol that is meant to be drunk. I *seriously* doubt that Rubbing alcohol is anywhere CLOSE to the primary topic here. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Alcoholic beverage per nom. Enix150 (talk) 23:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Alcoholic beverage per above, a closer match than the article about intoxication. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Lisa Krueger

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also directed Manny & Lo. Delete it to encourage creation. Nardog (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Ford F-100 Eluminator

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no such content at the target article. The "F-100 Eluminator" is a one-off show vehicle that is not and would not be covered at the target article nor at a related article. Sable232 (talk) 16:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

WWE Day 1

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 3#WWE Day 1

NCAA men's ice hockey tournament

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. plicit 23:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This title does not unambiguously refer to the target, as NCAA Division I men's ice hockey tournament, NCAA Division II men's ice hockey tournament, and NCAA Division III men's ice hockey tournament all exist. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, this is the primary topic. Add hatnote to
WP:TWOOTHER. 162 etc. (talk) 14:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Pole (Venezuela)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 3#Pole (Venezuela)

Shams ud Duha (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) Ca talk to me! 16:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The target does not disambiguate (or mention) "Shams ud Duha" Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • If
    Shams ud Duha is a valid redirect, then Shams ud Duha (disambiguation) is no different, since it points to a target performing a disambig-like function. Otherwise, bundle Shams ud Duha here, if the concern is with the u in Duha. Jay 💬 08:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947edits 05:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - plausible alternative transliteration, and the target already lists several by the name "Shamsuddoha". signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Rosguill. Thryduulf (talk) 17:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Baak (Telugu Film)

Indian films sometimes do this thing were they reshoot 10% or less of the film in another language. Either way, there is absolutely no need for this redirect when

Baak (film) exists. only 10% or less of people interest seeing Aranmanai 4 will likely opt to see this version due to low key release. DareshMohan (talk) 05:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: I think this is the same film as Baakghost. It looks like there is no point for this. Cleo Cooper (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC) (Striking account globally locked as an LTA ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 16:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]
  • Keep: This is obviously linked with the Afd of Baakghost. Here too, I suggest to Keep the redirect (and then rename. Baak (Telugu film) if needed, and maybe ask for page protection. Like that, history can be kept and further work on the article is easier. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to
    Baak (film) without redirect as the title has incorrect capitalization which is arguably an RDAB error. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Delete per nom. Okmrman (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete
Baak (film) already exists, no point in moving stuff around. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to
    Baak (film) without redirect to keep editing history. Hzh (talk) 14:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting together with the other similar RfD below.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Refine to the relevant section.
    Baak (film), Baak (Telugu film) and Baak (Telugu Film) all exist and all are useful and plausible search terms for the target. Plausible alternative capitalisations in the dismabiguator are no more a reason to delete a redirect than plausible alternative capitalisations outside the disambiguator are. Thryduulf (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Baak film redirects

Both of these redirects have no point. Both these redirects (Baakghost and Baak (Telugu film)) along with Baak (Telugu Film) were initially created by SenthilGugan as Articles for the Telugu dubbed version of Aranmanai 4. After seeing no need for another article, when there's already a primary article and an Afd the pages were turned to redirects. But, there is no need these many redirects, as not even the Google recognizes these names. I only included two redirects because, the other one has already been Rfded. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 11:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My comments remain the same. Hopefully this is no longer a dispute. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree that an apparent consensus seems to have been reached. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine Baak (Telugu film) to Aranmanai 4#Release, not #Theatrical. Delete Baakghost as a made up compound word. No need to retain the page history as a 3rd copy created by the same author in a span of 10 days. No need to salvage the page by renaming to a convoluted title of a different topic for the same reason (retaining page history). Jay 💬 17:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine Baak (Telugu film) per Jay. No opinion about Baakghost. Thryduulf (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cedar Ridge Middle School

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. I see no issue with the purported
WP:OR and would not serve as the basis for any text for a future article. If sources are ever identified for a topic by this name that is further the primary topic for this title, the disambiguation page can easily be moved. signed, Rosguill talk 20:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete for no mention at the target, and therefore confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on dabifying?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Hyperstar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate and retarget. Disambiguate
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 19:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned at target. For the former, note that Iran Hyper Star also appears to be written without a space on the logo. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom for now. Seems to be a camera accessory and also a name for a series of hypermarkets according to GSearch. --Lenticel (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Only mention in published research as a type of star is this, which is not even about metallicity but about a pathway for black hole formation. And the article it cites doesn't actually use this term. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget Hyperstar to Carrefour, Delete the plural. Jay 💬 15:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Unlabeled

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. A minority was against disambiguation, due to that fact that it will mainly consist of partial title matches, but the majority agreed that it falls under that circumstances described in the guideline, where it is beneficial.
(non-admin closure) Ca talk to me! 01:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

per

wp:SRD --MikutoH talk! 23:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Retarget to wikt:unlabeled again. --MikutoH talk! 23:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: dabifying is also possible as
Unlabeled sexuality, Unlabeled - The Demos also exist --MikutoH talk! 23:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I don't object. It seems like I incorrectly assumed your article was spam. My apologies. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 23:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I went ahead and restored the soft redirect, though I think this discussion should remain open since dabifying is also being considered as an option. CycloneYoris talk! 00:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per
    WP:PTMs. - Eureka Lott 13:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    @
    WP:PTM describes, some partial title matches do belong on disambiguation pages. I think title-subtitle is one of the more obvious cases for that. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    I suppose that could apply to Unlabeled - The Demos. Are there other good candidates for a potential disambiguation page? - Eureka Lott 18:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per MikutoH's last comment, plausible search term with several relevant entries. A Wiktionary link could be present on the dab if necessary. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 18:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I go for convert to disamb page, per Chaotic Enby's reasoning. I don't see an obvious primary topic here. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Unlabeled - The Demos per Shhh as a WP:ATD. Second choice, Delete per Eureka as a recently created unneeded redirect to a wiktionary page of an adjective word. Jay 💬 20:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per !votes to that end above. BD2412 T 23:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate - Partial title matches are not forbidden or banned, and I think this particular case is appropriate for some. Fieari (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Box 850

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 18:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia for that matter. 2001:999:68C:AC40:8038:7BCB:6859:B02D (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: {{
    R from alternate name}} is an acceptable reason to redirect, regardless of it being included in the article or not. I have no objections to someone adding it, but I do not believe it is necessary in order to keep this redirect. Fieari (talk) 03:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ).