Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islands/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

After a recent request, I added WikiProject Islands to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Islands/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 01:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

List of cleanup articles for your project

If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see: Cleanup listings A list of examples is here

Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages"

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page", contact me,

Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me,

Ikip 02:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Scottish Islands--MacRusgail (talk) 15:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Please see this article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_Island_of_Brighton,_ON_Canada I think it would be appropriate for the island project. I also note it may also be one of the largest artificial islands in the world. I see in the main artificial island article a claim is made for Flevopolder in the Netherlands with a total land surface of 970 km², as the largest artificial island in the world. I think this is likely incorrect, as the Artificial Island land mass formed by the Murray Canal is likely a bit larger. I will verify. Ddinglebb (talk) 20:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddinglebb (talk • contribs) 20:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

Duplicate article of Greenland, no sources to establish the notability, created by a suspected sockpuppet of Tobias Conradi who has been banned for abusing multiple accounts

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JJ98 (Talk) 05:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Category:Quemoy has been nominated to be renamed to Category:Kinmen see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 December 15 .. 65.93.13.227 (talk) 06:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I have nominated

17:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Stub-type

Shouldn't there be a {{

) 07:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

List of inhabited islands of Croatia

There is a new weekly section on the main page called "Today's featured list" and I have nominated

) 20:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Eyes, please...

...on Talk:Island#Reverted edits Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Readers here may be interested in contributing to the discussion taking place at

) 21:53, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

RfC on Senkaku Islands

There is currently an RfC on Talk:Senkaku Islands, a page that is marked as being of interest to this WikiProject. We would like to invite comments from other users at Talk:Senkaku Islands#Request for comment: Article naming. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

FYI, there is an "island" naming discussion at WT:Article titles#"Island", to add or not to add.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I set up Category:Islands in fiction and hopes it meets with approval from this WikiProject. I have included Oceania and Caribbean as sub-categories, along with Bermuda, Channel Islands, Corsica, Falkland Islands, Jurassic Park, Malta, Mauritius and Singapore, but not larger islands such as Cyprus, Iceland or Sri Lanka, because I was not sure that being on an island would be a notable part of the fictional setting in such countries. – Fayenatic London 20:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

I'd like to both apologise for any problems I may have caused with a new category I created earlier today, and also seek some expert help on what seems a slightly confused group of categories in WP. Earlier today Ic reated Category:Tombolos, and was busy populating it when I found that two underpopulated categories — Category:Tied islands and Category:Tidal islands — already exist, which to a certain extent overlap with my new creation. For the time being I've made both of the earlier categories subcategories of the new one, but all three could probably do with some expert knowledge in sorting out which article goes into which. Thanks, and again apologies! Grutness...wha? 01:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

This irrelevant to the topic but 'Shallow Bay' also refers to the latest album by breaking benjamin. There is no page on the album yet but i suggest you take measures to avoid confusion Malithyapa (talk) 07:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Done - there were two other "Shallow Bays" worth disambiguating, too. Grutness...wha? 01:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

This article is on my watchlist, but I am not an expert. Please could editors note concerns at Talk:Gough Island#Recent specific edits and determine whether my concerns are valid? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Is anyone interested in starting a Portal:Islands? WhisperToMe (talk) 07:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

I created a new portal: Portal:Islands. It still needs to be filled in in some places. Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 22:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_May_30#.22in.22_Vancouver_Island_categories.Skookum1 (talk) 04:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Main Page in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by Theo's Little Bot at 07:18, 5 July 2013 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Your input is requested at a peer review here. Neelix (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I am new to editing the Wikipedia. I have chosen the Wikipedia:WikiProject Islands to begin my experience. I am not sure what this "Peer review" is about, but I am ready to participate if someone will point me in the right direction. ITTechWriterA (talk) 17:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

When activated Wikipedia:WikiProject Islands/Article alerts can be transcluded on the main page or watchlisted separately. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, is the island deserted?? Talk:Ushant In ictu oculi (talk) 04:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

There is a proposal to move Senkaku Islands → Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands or Pinnacle Islands. Further views would be welcome at the disscussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Senkaku_Islands#Requested_move STSC (talk) 12:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to

. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the

) 05:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I created this proposal for a Channel Islands WikiProject if anyone wants to take a look. Thanks, Matty.007 19:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

The article Rottumeroog, which is also within the scope of this project, was selected by members of WikiProject Netherlands as the article for improvement in May 2014. Our ambitious goal is to improve the article to good article quality. You are invited to contribute to the article. – Editør (talk) 14:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm not convinced Glastonbury Tor is within the scope of WP Islands. from the article:

It has been described as an island but actually sits at the western end of a peninsula washed on three sides by the River Brue.

There are three other Wikiprojects watching this article. It's not referred to as an island in the lead and is not tagged in any island-related categories. Can we remove our wikiproject from its talk page? PaintedCarpet (talk) 00:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I have nominated

) 21:24, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Unassessed Articles

I've gone through and cleared the backlog of unassessed articles. As of today, the only articles in that category left are ones I've personally written, which I've not assessed to avoide COI. If anyone else can take a look at the remaining unassessed articles and rate them, that'd be great. PaintedCarpet (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Please see discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geology#Low islands, coral islands, and atolls. Evensteven (talk) 08:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

I've opened a discussion at

) 19:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Islands for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (drawl) @ 21:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Does anyone know what the link to "Wikimedia Islands" (which goes to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_India ) should be referring to? -- Chuq (talk) 01:59, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

It's a typo on my part. When I expanded the project page several months back I copied the style of WikiProject India, creating new pages for Islands as needed. Looks like I missed one. PaintedCarpet (talk) 21:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

I haven't google-resulted this yet, or incoming links etc, just fielding the page for consideration. My immediate instinct, especially given where I'm from and my interests in regional history and geography and such, that

) 13:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Expert attention

This is a notice about Category:Island articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. Iceblock (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Wikipedians,

We’d like to invite you to participate in a study that aims to explore how WikiProject members coordinate activities of distributed group members to complete project goals. We are specifically seeking to talk to people who have been active in at least one WikiProject in their time in Wikipedia. Compensation will be provided to each participant in the form of a $10 Amazon gift card.

The purpose of this study is to better understanding the coordination practices of Wikipedians active within WikiProjects, and to explore the potential for tool-mediated coordination to improve those practices. Interviews will be semi-structured, and should last between 45-60 minutes. If you decide to participate, we will schedule an appointment for the online chat session. During the appointment you will be asked some basic questions about your experience interacting in WikiProjects, how that process has worked for you in the past and what ideas you might have to improve the future.

You must be over 18 years old, speak English, and you must currently be or have been at one time an active member of a WikiProject. The interview can be conducted over an audio chatting channel such as Skype or Google Hangouts, or via an instant messaging client. If you have questions about the research or are interested in participating, please contact Michael Gilbert at (206) 354-3741 or by email at [email protected].

We cannot guarantee the confidentiality of information sent by email.

Weariness (talk) 19:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

The link to the relevant research page is m:Research:Means_and_methods_of_coordination_in_WikiProjects Md gilbert (talk) 00:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Re Talk:McMillan Island and many other cases I know of, infobox islands is limiting and has fields that are limiting as currently formulated; I commented on the talkpage of the infobox template but should raise a general issue here...and propose using infobox settlement on major settlements that are also islands.

The Indian reserve on McMillan Island or rather that is McMillan Island's legal status, includes the village of the Kwantlen First Nation, one of whose reserves it is. In other cases like Bowen Island which is a municipality infobox settlement should be used; others that are populated and when the names are synonymous between the actual island and that of (a) settlement on it (sometimes there's more than one settlement) then infobox settlement, IMO, should be used instead of infobox islands.

Sometimes, though, there will be two separate articles, e.g. when a postal address name/locality/settlement is not the only one on the island and is substantial enough to warrant its own article. I won't list all the island-communities I have in mind...but they are many.Skookum1 (talk) 09:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

At some possible risk to my sanity, I can direct you to Template talk:Infobox Scottish island#Wrapper. We have used this infobox for many years, principally becasue of the deficiences of infobox islands and it has hundreds of transclusions. The tenor of the discussion is that I am keen to ensure that the balance that needs to be struck between consistency and the unique nature of different island chains does not stray too far towards the latter. The general topic may have some resonance with your discussion about McMillan Island but the two "wrapper enthusiasts" who have started this discussion are clearly knowledgeable about and interested in the technical issues of infoboxes and may be willing to help. Ben MacDui 17:13, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Natural history of the Caribbean by islands has been listed for Categories for Discussion -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 04:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Isle of Mull to be moved to Mull. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, nearly all wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:

1. supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
2. opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced article if they are not sourced, so your project may want to pursue the projects below.

The naming of the article at Ireland and the usage and topic of the pagename "Ireland" are up for discussion, see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ireland_Collaboration#Move "Ireland" to "Ireland (island)" or similar (June 2015) -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

When I started working on islands articles a year and a half ago, there were more than 2,000 unassessed articles. Today there are 0. We cleared the backlog. Great job, everybody! PaintedCarpet (talk) 21:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi all,

) 01:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Also, List of islands in the Arctic Ocean, List of islands in the Atlantic Ocean, and List of islands in the Indian Ocean exist and are quite developed, so it makes sense to have a Pacific version too with the main list. Gap9551 (talk) 02:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Is

) 14:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Greetings WikiProject Islands/Archive 1 Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

• Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards,

— Delivered: 18:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

A series of categories relating to Great Britain have been nominated for re-naming here which may interest this project. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Please come participate in the

! 17:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathons. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Organizations" "Sports" "Pacific islanders"

(To subscribe:

) 10:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Islands/Archive 1/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Islands.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

• The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
• The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
• The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Islands, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Is there a list of countries that shows the number of islands per country? Ping me when you reply. Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 03:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.

A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Islands

Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod ^talk 16:19, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

This RfC at Talk:Gråen#RfC on multiple maps may be of general interest and have implications for other articles. The question is whether the feature to display multiple levels of maps (in this case for Scania, Sweden and Europe) should be used in the {{Infobox islands}} template to convey the location of an island. Thanks. —DIYeditor (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

There's a Good article discussion happening at

! 00:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

If someone else can come look at this, that would be great. I've done an initial review, so now we need someone to implement the changes. I'd do them, but then my review wouldn't be valid for making it a Good Article. Thanks for any help! ···

Join WP Japan

! 17:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

If one or two people can come look over this and make the suggested changes, that would be great. It shouldn't take more than a few minutes. I reviewed it, so I can't be the one making the changes. Thanks! ···

Join WP Japan

! 18:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

I tried to add the line | static_image_alt = to the infobox and got an error message. It wouldn't take | image_alt = , either. Was I doing something wrong, or is

21:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

It's OK, I've found the template and the answer : | image alt = . Tony Holkham (Talk) 21:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the

.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:42, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Need some disambiguation for Pentecost Island since there is one off the coast of Queensland, Australia, in addition to the one in Vanuatu. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mulehide (talk • contribs) 15:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

There is a

  19:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Macaronesia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Macaronesia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Singapore, an article of interest to this project, has been nominated for Good Article. It seems possible for it to become a Good Article, though it needs tidying up. If anyone is interested in helping out, see the review: Talk:Singapore/GA3. SilkTork (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

I have nominated

03:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

FAR for Amchitka

I have nominated

) 22:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Mainland Australia

Hi there, I was wondering if anyone would be able to have a look at the Mainland Australia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainland_Australia) stub in a few weeks time. Would be appreciated.Watermelon42 (talk) 02:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

To help coordinate with adding infoboxes and getting an overview of the pages missing an infobox I'm looking for community feedback before implementing one or both of these parameters. Discussed further on: Proposing adding needs attention and needs infobox parameters to the Islands template Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 17:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (New Zealand) has an RFC for possible consensus that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 09:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

There is a

) 15:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to

. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on

and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

-

}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

In List of islands by highest point there is a column representing "pointiness", with units relating to the height divided by the area. (To make something approximating a gradient, the power of the height has to be double the power of the area.) This seems well-intentioned, but the actual units have changed several times, and there is no evidence this is any sort of notable measure - and it is surely a lot less notable than many other possibilities such as population density. Please make comments on the Talk page. Imaginatorium (talk) 08:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Saba#Requested move 8 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 16:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Isles of Scilly has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RFC on using maps and charts in Wikipedia articles. Rschen7754 15:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

The RFC, now at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Using maps as sources, has questions related to notability. --Rschen7754 06:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

There is a split proposal ongoing at

) 13:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

We are discussing a proposal to refactor the guidelines for geographic feature notability. Please feel free to join in the discussion of this proposal. — hike395 (talk) 03:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

) 04:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Vulcano#Requested move 18 September 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)