Airport security repercussions due to the September 11 attacks
This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2011) |
![]() | The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (February 2025) |
After the September 11 attacks, there was an immediate call to action regarding the state of aviation security measures as the hijackers involved in 9/11 were able to successfully pass through security and take command of the plane. The existing security measures flagged more than half of the 19 hijackers in 9/11; however, they were cleared to board the plane because their bags were not found to contain any explosives.[1] In the months and years following September 11, 2001, security at many airports worldwide were reformed to deter similar terrorist plots.[2][3][1][4]
Changes in airport security
Prior to September 11, 2001, airport screening was provided in the U.S. by
Increased security on aircraft
Increased security screening
On September 11, hijackers
Airport checkpoint screening has been significantly tightened since 2001, and security personnel are more thoroughly trained to detect weapons or explosives. In addition to standard metal detectors, many U.S. airports now employ
Identification checks
On September 11, some hijackers lacked proper identification, yet they were allowed to board due to being on domestic aircraft. After 9/11, all passengers 18 years or older in the United States must now have valid government-issued
A European Union regulation demanded airlines make sure that the individual boarding the aircraft is the same individual who checked in his or her luggage;[13] this was implemented by verifying an individual's identification both at luggage check-in and when boarding.
Some countries also fingerprint travellers or use retina and iris scanning to help detect potential criminals, although this is predominantly in relation to detection of immigration violations by inbound passengers rather than security checking of outbound passengers.[14]
Criticism
With regard to the 2015
Lawsuit
In 2003,
Privacy issues
Air security and restrictions after the September, 2001 terrorist attacks have helped prevent further attacks from happening, but many Americans have issues with their privacy when traveling. The Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS), was first implemented in the late 1990's by the FFA. CAPPS flagged 6 of the 19 terrorists that were part of the attacks in 2001. The concern with CAPPS was that it also flagged 65,000 other passengers that day. Many Americans viewed this as a threat to their privacy and their information. CAPPS II was created post 9/11 and was created for the same purpose of preventing terrorist attacks and ensuring the safety of Americans. Many Americans had issues with CAPPS II because they believe that it racially and politically profiled passengers.[18] In 2004, the TSA was delayed in testing and developing CAPPS II because they could not obtain passenger data because of privacy concerns.[19]
See also
- Airport security
- No-fly list
- Security repercussions due to the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot
- Canadian Air Transport Security Authority
- Airport racial profiling in the United States
- Security theater — unnecessary implementation of security measures for display
- Don't touch my junk — criticism of full-body pat-downs by the TSA
References
- ^ OCLC 227897515.
- ^ .
- ^ S2CID 169783581.
- ISSN 2070-8270.
- ^ a b Höjd säkerhet på flyget Archived 2015-09-23 at the Wayback Machine (di.se 12 sep 2001) (Swedish)
- ^ "Transportation Security Timeline | Transportation Security Administration". www.tsa.gov. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
- OCLC 779182727.
- ^ "Jet cockpit doors nearly impossible to open by intruders". Thestar.com. 26 March 2015. Archived from the original on 2015-05-13. Retrieved 13 May 2015.
- ^ "The 9/11 Commission Report" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-10-19. Retrieved 2013-12-20.
- ^ "Guns..." PMP | PMP-Magazine.com. 2019-08-06. Archived from the original on 2022-06-19. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
- ^ Kuta, Sarah. "You Can Now Meet Friends and Family at the Gate at This California Airport". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2024-08-23.
- ^ "SIDA and AOA Badge Identification Requirements | Montrose County - Official Website". www.montrosecounty.net. Archived from the original on 2022-06-19. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
- ^ "Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 ... common rules in the field of civil aviation security".
- ^ "75,000 arrested at airport last year after undergoing iris scan". Archived from the original on 2018-02-14. Retrieved 2018-02-14.
- ^ Yu, Yijun (26 March 2015). "Germanwings flight 4U9525: a victim of the deadlock between safety and security demands". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 2015-04-29. Retrieved 13 May 2015.
- Wired News, 2003-01-18
- ^ Ryan Singel, "Flight ID Fight Revived" Archived 2013-06-17 at the Wayback Machine, Wired News, 2004-08-16
- ^ Sidel, Mark (2004). More Secure Less Free?. The University of Michigan Press. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
- ^ "AVIATION SECURITY Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System Faces Significant Implementation Challenges" (PDF). gao.gov. Retrieved 3 November 2023.