Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis
Other namesNMDA receptor antibody encephalitis, anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, anti-NMDAR encephalitis
plasma exchange, azathioprine[2]
PrognosisTypically good (with treatment)[1]
FrequencyRare [2]
Deaths~4% risk of death[2]

Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is a type of

blood pressure and heart rate variability typically occur.[1] In some cases, patients may develop catatonia.[5]

About half of cases are associated with

MRI of the brain is often normal.[2] Misdiagnosis is common.[7]

Treatment is typically with

immunosuppresive medication and, if a tumor is present, surgery to remove it.[1] With treatment, about 80% of cases have a good outcome.[1] Outcomes are better if treatment is begun earlier.[2] Long-term mental or behavioral problems may remain.[2] About 4% of those affected die from the condition.[2] Recurrence occurs in about 10% of people.[1]

The estimated number of cases of the disease is one in 1.5 million people per year.

paraneoplastic disorders.[2] About 80% of those affected are female.[2] It typically occurs in adults younger than 45 years old, but it can occur at any age.[4][7] The disease was first described by Josep Dalmau in 2007.[1][9]

Signs and symptoms

Prior to the development of a symptom complex that is specific to anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, people may experience prodromal symptoms, including

The symptoms usually appear psychiatric in nature, which may confound the differential diagnosis. In many cases, this leads to the illness going undiagnosed.

autonomic dysfunction, hypoventilation, cerebellar ataxia, loss of feeling on one side of the body,[16] loss of consciousness, or catatonia.[17] During this acute phase, most patients require treatment in an intensive care unit to stabilize breathing, heart rate, and blood pressure.[citation needed] One distinguishing characteristic of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is the concurrent presence of many of the above listed symptoms. The majority of patients experience at least four symptoms, with many experiencing six or seven over the course of the disease.[13][14]

Pathophysiology

The condition is mediated by

immunological tolerance can occur. Other autoimmune mechanisms are suspected for patients who do not have tumors. Whilst the exact pathophysiology of the disease is still debated, empirical evaluation of the origin of anti-NMDA receptor antibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid leads to the consideration of two possible mechanisms.[citation needed
]

These mechanisms may be informed by some simple observations. Serum NMDA receptor antibodies are consistently found at higher concentrations than cerebrospinal fluid antibodies, on average ten times higher.[19][20] This strongly suggests the antibody production is systemic rather than in the brain or cerebrospinal fluid. When concentrations are normalized for total IgG, intrathecal synthesis is detected. This implies that there are more NMDA receptor antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid than would be predicted given the expected quantities of total IgG.[citation needed]

  1. Passive access involves the
    mast cells in acute stress has been shown to facilitate BBB penetration.[22]
    However, it is also possible that the autonomic dysfunction manifested in many patients during the later phases of the condition aids antibody entry. For example, an increase in blood pressure would force larger proteins, such as antibodies, to extravasate into the cerebrospinal fluid.
  2. Intrathecal production (production of antibodies in the
    intrathecal space) is also a possible mechanism.[23] Dalmau et al. demonstrated that 53 out of 58 patients with the condition had at least partially preserved BBBs, whilst having a high concentration of antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid. Furthermore, cyclophosphamide and rituximab, drugs used to eliminate dysfunctional immune cells, have been shown to be successful second-line treatments in patients where first-line immunotherapy has failed.[24] These destroy excess antibody-producing cells in the thecal sac
    , thus alleviating the symptoms.

A more sophisticated analysis of the processes involved in antibody presence in the cerebrospinal fluid hints at a combination of these two mechanisms in tandem.[citation needed]

Antibodies

Once the antibodies have entered the CSF, they bind to the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor. There are three possible methods in which neuronal damage occurs.

  1. A reduction in the density of NMDA receptors on the post synaptic knob, due to receptor internalization once the antibody has bound. This is dependent on antibodies
    cross linking.[25]
  2. The direct antagonism of the NMDA receptor by the antibody, similar to the action of the classic dissociative anesthetics phencyclidine and ketamine.
  3. The recruitment of the
    complement cascade via the classical pathway (antibody-antigen interaction). Membrane attack complex (MAC) is one of the end products of this cascade[26]
    and can insert into neurons as a molecular barrel, allowing water to enter. The cell subsequently lyses. Notably, this mechanism is unlikely as it causes the cell to die, which is inconsistent with current evidence.

Diagnosis

First and foremost is a high level of clinical suspicion, especially in young adults showing abnormal behavior as well as autonomic instability. Clinical examination may further reveal delusions and hallucinations, which can aid diagnostic efforts.[citation needed]

The initial investigation usually consists of clinical examination, MRI of the brain, an EEG, and a lumbar puncture for CSF analysis. MRI of the brain may show abnormalities in the temporal and frontal lobes, but do so in less than half of cases. A FDG-PET scan of the brain may show abnormalities in cases when the MRI scan is normal.[27] EEG is abnormal in almost 90% of cases and typically shows general or focal slow wave activity.[28] CSF analysis often shows inflammatory changes with increased levels of white blood cells, total protein and the presence of oligoclonal bands.[29] NMDA receptor antibodies can be detected in serum and/or CSF. Whole body FDG-PET is usually performed as a part of tumor screening. Gynecological ultrasound or a pelvic MRI might be performed to search for an ovarian teratoma in women.

Diagnostic criteria for probable and definite anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis have been proposed to facilitate diagnosis at an early stage of the disease and help initiate early treatment.[30]

Management

If a person is found to have a tumor, the long-term prognosis is generally better and the chance of relapse is much lower. This is because the tumor can be removed surgically, thus eradicating the source of autoantibodies. In general, early diagnosis and aggressive treatment is believed to improve patient outcomes, but this remains impossible to know without data from randomized controlled trials.[13] Given that the majority of patients are initially seen by psychiatrists, it is critical that all physicians (especially psychiatrists) consider anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis as a possible cause of acute psychosis in young patients with no past neuropsychiatric history.[citation needed]

Prognosis

The recovery process from anti-NMDAR encephalitis can take many months. The symptoms may reappear in reverse order: The patient may begin to experience psychosis again, leading many people to falsely believe the patient is not recovering. As the recovery process continues on, the psychosis fades. Lastly, the person's social behavior and executive functions begin to improve.[10]

Epidemiology

The estimated number of cases of the disease is 1.5 per million people per year.[6] According to the California Encephalitis Project, the disease has a higher incidence than its individual viral counterparts in patients younger than 30.[32] The largest case series as of 2013 characterized 577 people with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. The data were limited, but provides the best approximation of disease distribution. It found that women make up 81% of cases. Disease onset is skewed toward children, with a median age of diagnosis of 21 years. Over a third of cases were children, while only 5% of cases were patients over the age of 45. This same review found that 394 out of 501 patients (79%) had a good outcome by 24 months.[13] 30 people (6%) died, and the rest were left with mild to severe deficits. The study mentioned that of the 38% presenting with tumors, 94% of those presented with ovarian teratomas. Within that subset, African & Asian women were more likely to have a tumor, but this was not relevant to the prevalence of the disease within those racial groups.[13]

Society and culture

Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is suspected of being an underlying cause of historical accounts of

demonic possession.[33][34][35][36]

New York Post reporter Susannah Cahalan wrote a book titled Brain on Fire: My Month of Madness about her experience with the disease.[34] This has subsequently been turned into a film of the same name.[37]

Dallas Cowboys defensive lineman Amobi Okoye spent 17 months battling anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. In addition to three months in a medically-induced coma, he experienced a 145-day memory gap and lost 78 pounds. He returned to practice on October 23, 2014.[38]

In the Japanese movie called The 8-Year Engagement, a young Japanese woman ends up being in a coma due to anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.

Berlin Zoological Garden that died on 19 March 2011, was diagnosed with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in August 2015. This was the first case discovered in a non-human animal.[39][40][41]

In Hannibal, Will Graham was affected by NMDA receptor or antibody encephalitis, also known as anti-NMDAR encephalitis.[42]

The TV series Something's Killing Me featured an episode called "Into Madness" that featured two cases of the disease.[43]

Figures

An extreme delta brush in a patient. This EEG pattern is sometimes observed in anti-NMDAr encephalitis. From Mizoguchi et al., 2022.[44]

See also

References

  1. ^
    PMID 25458857
    .
  2. ^ .
  3. .
  4. ^ .
  5. .
  6. ^ .
  7. ^ . Retrieved 14 July 2018.
  8. .
  9. .
  10. ^ .
  11. .
  12. . Retrieved 2023-02-24.
  13. ^ .
  14. ^ .
  15. .
  16. ^ Cahalan S (2013). Brain on Fire-My Month of Madness. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  17. PMID 38424748
    .
  18. .
  19. .
  20. .
  21. .
  22. .
  23. .
  24. .
  25. .
  26. .
  27. .
  28. .
  29. .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. ^ Lamas DJ (27 May 2013). "When the brain is under attack". The Boston Globe.
  34. ^ a b "A YoungReporter Chronicles Her 'Brain On Fire'". Fresh Air. WHYY; NPR. November 14, 2012. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
  35. S2CID 36151332
    .
  36. .
  37. ^ Hornaday A, O'Sullivan M. "What to watch with your kids: 'Ant-Man and the Wasp,' 'Leave No Trace' and more". Washington Post. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
  38. ^ Whitmire K (2014-10-23). "Cowboys' Okoye returns to practice after battling rare brain disease". www.foxsports.com. FOX Sports Southwest. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  39. ^ Nuwer R (27 August 2015). "Knut the Polar Bear's Mysterious Death Finally Solved". Smithsonian.
  40. .
  41. ^ Prüss H, Leubner J, Wenke NK, Czirják GÁ, Szentiks CA, Greenwood AD (August 2015). "Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis in the Polar Bear (Ursus maritimus) Knut". Scientific Reports. 5 (12805): 12805.
    PMID 26313569
    .
  42. ^ Pitt A (21 February 2018). "Hannibal and Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis". Encephalitis Society. North Yorkshire.
  43. ^ "Something's Killing Me Season 1".[permanent dead link]
  44. PMID 35242143
    .

External links