Battle of Bita Paka
Battle of Bita Paka | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Australian occupation of German New Guinea | |||||||
An Australian soldier of the AN&MEF and his mother in Sydney, 1914, prior to departing for Rabaul | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Australia | |||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Charles Elwell † | Hans Wuchert | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
500 1 light cruiser several destroyers |
61 Germans 240 Melanesian police | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
7 killed 5 wounded |
31 killed (1 German, 30 Melanese police) 11 wounded (1 German, 10 Melanese police) 75 captured |
The Battle of Bita Paka (11 September 1914) was fought south of Kabakaul, on the island of
After an unopposed landing, a mixed force of German reservists and half-trained Melanesian police mounted a stout resistance and forced the Australians to fight their way to the objective. After a day of fighting during which both sides suffered casualties, Australian forces captured the wireless station at Bita Paka. The battle was Australia's first major military engagement of the war and the only significant action of the campaign; in its aftermath the remaining German forces on New Britain fled inland to Toma. Following a brief siege there the German garrison capitulated, ending resistance to the Australian occupation of the island.
Background
Terrain
German New Guinea consisted of north-eastern
While the western half of New Guinea had been administered by the
On 1 April 1899, the German government took formal control, establishing a protectorate. A treaty with Spain, signed on 30 July, ensured German control over several other island groups in the Pacific, and these were added to the protectorate of German New Guinea.[5] The economic life of German New Guinea's small population of European and Asian settlers, as well as that of its Melanesian population, relied heavily on the export of copra and the import of goods and services.[6] It remained a modest outpost, and by August 1914 only 1,273 Europeans lived in the colony, while there was also a small but significant number of Japanese, Chinese and Malays.[7]
Prelude
Planning and preliminary operations
Following Britain's declaration of war on Imperial Germany on 4 August 1914 at the outbreak of the First World War, Australia and the other members of the
Meanwhile, after an additional British request for assistance on 6 August 1914, the Australian government hurriedly prepared another expeditionary force to destroy the German wireless stations at
While the Australian Naval and Military Expeditionary Force (AN&MEF) was being raised for this task, as a prelude to an amphibious landing on the Gazelle Peninsula in New Britain, ships of the Australian Squadron conducted a reconnaissance of the area, subsequently entering
Opposing forces
The AN&MEF comprised one
At the outbreak of war, German New Guinea was only lightly defended; even after all available reservists had reported for duty and the Melanesian police had been armed, the total strength was only 61 German
Battle
Initial landings
Off the eastern tip of New Guinea, Berrima rendezvoused with Australia and the light cruiser HMAS Sydney and several destroyers, while Melbourne was detached to destroy the wireless station on Nauru. Melbourne arrived there on 9 September only to find that the radio station had already been disabled by its staff, with Nauru surrendering without opposition. The task force reached Rabaul on 11 September, where they found the port to be free of German forces. Sydney and the destroyer HMAS Warrego landed small parties of naval reservists at the settlements of Kabakaul and at Herbertshöhe. These parties were reinforced firstly by sailors from Warrego and later by infantry from Berrima.[21] Two parties were subsequently landed, one under Sub-Lieutenant C. Webber and the other commanded by Lieutenant Commander J.F. Finlayson. In accordance with German plans, the Australians encountered no opposition at Herbertshöhe, with the German company stationed there having withdrawn to Takubar—between Herbertshöhe and Kabakaul—in the early morning. At 07:00, the Australians raised the Union Jack over the settlement.[22]
The Australians believed there were probably two radio stations, one under construction 4 miles (6.4 km) directly inland from Herbertshöhe and the other directly inland from Kabakaul, at Bita Paka. Finlayson remained at Herbertshöhe to guard the stores being landed from Sydney, while Webber's party began an advance from Herbertshöhe inland along the Toma road.[23] Another party under Lieutenant Rowland Bowen would advance towards Bita Paka, 7 kilometres (4.3 mi) to the south. Bowen's force, consisting of two officers and 25 naval reservists was subsequently landed at Kabakaul. Also included were about 15 other personnel to provide medical support and maintain communications.[24]
Advance inland
The advance inland began along the fringe of the dense jungle-edged road to the radio station, with the Australians attempting to avoid the road wherever possible.[21] By 09:00 they had penetrated about 2,000 yards (1,800 m) and with the scrub becoming denser, the scouts pushed away from the road to work their way around the obstacle. They suddenly surprised a group of about 20 Melanesian soldiers led by three German reservists, who were apparently laying an ambush on the road for the advancing Australians. They opened fire, wounding one German in the hand and capturing him, and scattering the Melanesians. By means of a ruse Wuchert and Mayer were also captured, depriving the defenders of two important commanders, while several significant maps also fell into Australian hands at this time.[25]
Realising that his advance was going to be contested, Bowen requested reinforcements. Consequently, as an interim measure, 59 men from Warrego and Yarra were landed under Lieutenant G.A. Hill, until infantry could arrive from Berrima, which was still steaming towards Kabakaul from
The reinforcements landed earlier from the destroyers reached Bowen by 10:00 however, and the situation was stabilised. The advance was subsequently resumed, but the Australians had not gone more than 500 yards (460 m) when they encountered a strongly held German trench dug across the road.[24] Working together, Hill and Bowen attempted to outflank the Germans, during which Bowen was shot and badly wounded by a sniper, leaving Hill in command.[29] Berrima subsequently landed reinforcements, including a half-battalion commanded by Lieutenant Commander Charles Elwell, as well as a machine-gun section and medical detachment. Among the reinforcements was the battalion commander, Beresford, and the intelligence officer.[27]
Fighting for the wireless station
Elwell advanced inland rapidly and was soon also engaged, losing one killed and two wounded in a brief skirmish.[30] During the advance the Australians had also uncovered and defused a large pipe mine the Germans had buried under a narrow track and set to detonate using a command wire. These mines had been laid beneath the road with wires leading to an electric battery and a firing key at the bottom of a lookout tree.[31] By 13:00 however, Hill's position was reached and the Australians—now under Elwell's overall command—launched another flanking attack on the main trench blocking the road. Despite suffering casualties they pressed their attack, forcing the defenders to surrender after charging the trench with fixed bayonets. A German officer and 20 Melanesians were captured. Four Australians were killed, including Elwell who died leading the charge with his sword drawn, and another five were wounded.[24]
Now under the command of Hill, and accompanied by two German prisoners acting as interpreters, the Australians proceeded down the road under a flag of truce and persuaded the garrisons of two more trenches to surrender, but not before another skirmish in which the Germans counter-attacked, wounding three more Australians, one fatally. During the firefight, the Australians killed one of the unarmed German interpreters and several of the Melanesians. The advance continued and another group of defenders was encountered and disarmed by nightfall.[24] By 19:00 the Australians reached the radio station which was found abandoned; the mast had been dismantled, although the instruments and machinery remained intact. The surviving defenders had abandoned the defences and withdrawn.[32]
Aftermath
Casualties
During the fighting at Bita Paka, seven Australians were killed and five wounded, while casualties among the defenders included one German and about 30 Melanesians killed, and one German and 10 Melanesians wounded; 19 Germans and 56 Melanesians were captured.[33] Later it was alleged that the heavy losses among the Melanesian troops were the result of the Australians bayoneting a number that they had captured.[33][34] While the casualties suffered by the Australians were light in the context of later operations, they were disproportionately heavy given the modest territorial and strategic gains and were further compounded by the disappearance of the submarine AE1 during a patrol off Rabaul on 14 September, with all 35 men aboard.[35] After their defeat, the remaining German forces and the civil administration withdrew 19 miles (31 km) inland to Toma, believing they would have time to regroup before the Australians arrived.[36]
The German governor—
Capture of German New Guinea
The German colony at Madang on Kaiser-Wilhelmsland (the New Guinea mainland) was occupied on 24 September, although the German armed merchant raider SMS Cormoran—which was lurking nearby—escaped undetected. Over the next two months the remaining outposts were also occupied.[39] Meanwhile, the German East Asia Squadron steamed across the Pacific before surprising and sinking a British force off Coronel on 1 November. After rounding Cape Horn into the Atlantic and attempting a raid on the Stanley naval station, the squadron was itself destroyed by a more powerful British force during the Battle of the Falkland Islands on 8 December 1914.[40] Later it was alleged that widespread looting and destruction of civilian property by Australian troops occurred during this period.[41] Indeed, ill-discipline among the Australian force appears to have been an issue—perhaps due to the haste with which the AN&MEF had been raised and the poor character of some of those that were enlisted.[42] Claims in the Australian media of criminal behaviour caused considerable controversy at the time, and later led to a parliamentary enquiry. In the end, a number of soldiers were court martialled and imprisoned for looting and theft, although more serious allegations, including rape, also arose.[43][Note 3]
Following the capture of the remaining German possessions in the region, the AN&MEF provided occupation forces for the duration of the war.[45] Holmes subsequently established a military government which continued until 1921, after which Australia received a mandate from the League of Nations to govern the territory.[46] The Australian military administration continued the exploitative economic policies of the previous German colonial administration, and official policy was to continue the status quo, including the use of indentured Melanesian labour on plantations, the levy of the "native head tax" and official floggings, or corporal punishment.[47][Note 4] Equally, despite previously being protected by the German colonial administration in 1914, the hunting of the native bird-of-paradise, crowned pigeon and white heron for the lucrative trade in their feathers and skin, was officially condoned and a custom tax levied on their export.[48][Note 5] Under the terms of the German surrender, Haber was allowed to return to Germany, while German civilians could remain as long as they swore an oath of neutrality. Those who refused were later transported to Australia, whence they could freely travel back to Germany.[49][Note 6]
On 9 January 1915,
Assessment
Ultimately, the Australian operation on New Britain achieved its objectives, with the AN&MEF destroying the wireless station before seizing the colony, reducing a strategic German possession in the Pacific and thereby denying its use to support their naval forces in the region. Although successful, it had not been well-managed, and the Australians had been effectively delayed by a few reserve officers and an under-trained Melanesian police force.
Apart from the very real human suffering of the Melanesian troops killed or wounded at Bita Paka, the reduction in German prestige due to the capture of German New Guinea, and the economic and property losses experienced by some German colonists during the occupation, the battle ultimately held little strategic significance for Germany. The fighting yielded few tactical lessons given the very different nature of the fighting there to that of the mass industrialised warfare which both the Germans and Australians experienced in Europe. Just as many Australians felt that "the real war was in Europe", most Germans were less concerned with battles in the colonies and more focused on the war at home.[55]
See also
Notes
- ^ "Deutsch-Neuguinea: Kaiser-Wilhelms-Land und die Inselwelt im Stillen Ozean – deutsche Kolonie 1885–1919" (in German). 2000. Retrieved 4 November 2009. gives the figure of 249,500 square kilometres (96,300 sq mi), while MacKenzie 1941, p. 8 cites 92,000 square miles (240,000 km2).
- ^ One German officer—Hauptmann Hermann Detzner—and about 20 Melanesian police managed to evade capture in the interior of New Guinea for the entire war. Unknown to Detzner, the war had commenced whilst he was on a surveying expedition to map the border with Australian-held Papua. He later claimed to have penetrated the interior of Kaiser-Wilhelmsland (the German portion of New Guinea) in his 1920 book, "Vier Jahre unter Kannibalen" ("Four Years among Cannibals"). However, this was disputed by various German missionaries, and Detzner recanted most of his claims in 1932.[38]
- ^ The enquiry by Judge Hubert Murray, the Lieutenant-Governor of Papua, into allegations of looting of German, Chinese and Japanese properties, and of the manner in which the Melanesians were treated during the period of military administration in German New Guinea was completed after the war in 1919.[44]
- ^ See also Hiery 1995.
- ^ As many as 100,000 birds were subsequently killed before they were again protected in 1923, more than double the number killed during the German bird of paradise boom before they were protected in 1914.[48]
- ^ Hiery suggests the German colonial policies in the Pacific were liberal when compared to the subsequent policies initiated by the Australians, Japanese and New Zealand administrators that replaced them. He argues that the German administrators had allowed for the conservation or adaptation of traditional lifestyles, in contrast to the later Australian administration.
References
Citations
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 1–6.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 2.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 21–22.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 22.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 3.
- ^ Rowley 1958, p. 7.
- ^ Rowley 1958, p. 56.
- ^ Odgers 1994, p. 58.
- ^ MacDougall 1991, p. 30.
- ^ Grey 2008, pp. 86–87.
- ^ Grey 1999, p. 82.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 38.
- ^ a b c Grey 1999, p. 87.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 25–28.
- ^ a b Kuring 2004, p. 44.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 23–35.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 32.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 31.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 48.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 49.
- ^ a b MacKenzie 1941, p. 53.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 50–52.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 52–53.
- ^ a b c d Coulthard-Clark 1998, p. 96.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 55–56.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 56–57.
- ^ a b MacKenzie 1941, p. 58.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 59.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 60.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 61.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 62.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 66–67.
- ^ a b c Coulthard-Clark 1998, p. 97.
- ^ Hiery 1995, pp. 25, 33 & 277.
- ^ Bean 1946, p. 47.
- ^ a b c Odgers 1994, p. 42.
- ^ Bean 1946, p. 36.
- ^ Meade 2005, pp. 75–80.
- ^ Bean 1946, p. 38.
- ^ Grey 1999, pp. 82–83.
- ^ Hiery 1995, pp. 45–47.
- ^ Marre 2009, p. 5.
- ^ "Australians at Rabaul. Serious Allegations. Charges against officers. "Loot, Plunder and Rapine". Debate in Parliament". The Argus. Melbourne. 23 April 1915. p. 8. Retrieved 23 December 2009.
- ^ "Serious Charges by German. "Slave Hunts Among Natives". Comment by Minister". The Argus. Melbourne. 14 November 1919. p. 7. Retrieved 24 December 2009.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 105–126.
- ^ Dennis et al 2008, p. 235.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, pp. 219–233.
- ^ a b Hiery 1995, pp. 47–50.
- ^ Bean 1946, p. 37.
- ^ a b MacKenzie 1941, p. 189.
- ^ a b MacKenzie 1941, pp. 154–155.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 342.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 364.
- ^ a b Grey 1999, p. 83.
- ^ a b Beaumont 1995, p. 8.
- ^ MacKenzie 1941, p. 24.
Sources
- OCLC 28535580.
- ISBN 1-86373-461-9.
- Coulthard-Clark, Chris (1998). Where Australians Fought: The Encyclopaedia of Australia's Battles (First ed.). St Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin. OCLC 39097011.
- Dennis, Peter; ISBN 978-0195517842.
- Grey, Jeffrey (1999). A Military History of Australia (Second ed.). Port Melbourne, Victoria: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-64483-6.
- Grey, Jeffrey (2008). A Military History of Australia (Third ed.). Port Melbourne, Victoria: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-69791-0.
- Hiery, Herman (1995). The Neglected War: The German South Pacific and the Influence of World War I. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 0-8248-1668-4.
- Kuring, Ian (2004). Redcoats to Cams: A History of Australian Infantry 1788–2001. Loftus, New South Wales: Australian Military History Publications. ISBN 1-876439-99-8.
- MacDougall, Anthony (1991). Australians at War: A Pictorial History. Balgowlah, New South Wales: Reed Books. ISBN 1-86503-865-2.
- OCLC 494426919.
- Marre, Adam (2009). "Searching for Bitapaka: Creating Voices for History's Silenced". Limina. 15: 2–13. from the original on 25 January 2010. Retrieved 23 December 2009.
- Meade, Kevin (2005). Heroes Before Gallipoli: Bita Paka and that One Day in September. Milton, Queensland: John Wiley & Sons Australia. ISBN 1-74031-117-5.
- ISBN 1-86302-669-X.
- Rowley, Charles (1958). The Australians in German New Guinea 1914–1921. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press. OCLC 378150.
Further reading
- Piggott, Michael (April 1988). "Stonewalling in German New Guinea". The Journal of the Australian War Memorial. 12. Canberra: Australian War Memorial: 3–15. ISSN 1327-0141.