Citizen sourcing

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Citizen sourcing is the government adoption of

situational awareness
. Applications of citizen sourcing include:

  • The use of
    ideation
    tools by government agencies to collect ideas and suggestions from the public
  • The use of problem-solving tools that allow citizens to identify and evaluate solutions to problems proposed
  • The adoption of citizen reporting platforms, such as for crime or emergency response information
  • The government monitoring of social media, such as Twitter, for situational awareness, such as with regard to natural disasters

Citizen sourcing has gained prominence as part of the Obama administration's Open Government Initiative and is seen, in the words of Vivek Kundra, as a way of driving "innovation by tapping into the ingenuity of the American people"[1] to solve those problems that are too big for government to solve on its own. Similarly, David Cameron of the British Conservatives believes that citizen sourcing mechanisms and the advent of Web 2.0 technologies will help usher in "the next age of government" by truly enabling citizens to act on John Kennedy's historic call to "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country."[2]

History

Citizen sourcing is a derivative of the term

coproduction of public services by service users and communities enabled by the maturation of Web 2.0
participatory technologies.

Examples

Citizen advocacy

For part of the Obama and Trump Administrations, the We the People system collected signatures on petitions, which were entitled to an official response from the White House once a certain number had been reached.

Online ideation platforms for government

Taiwan uses a system called vTaiwan to crowdsource deliberations over important issues, and to draft proposed legislation for the country's government.[3][4] It was created in 2015 by the g0v community as part of the Sunflower Student Movement. Output from the platform was influential in the regulation of Uber, allowing fintech experimentation, and dozens of other issues, though not all (such as the legalization of online alcohol sales) were permanently adopted.[5][6] vTaiwan inspired an in-house government system called Join, which is being used with some local governments who are committing to respond to petitions that have reached a certain threshold of support.[5]

Granicus[7] is an example of another solution that has been implemented in a number of cities like Austin, Texas[8] that allows the public to submit ideas for government services, improve upon these ideas with the help of government employees that moderate the discussions online, and ultimately design solutions in a crowdsourcing fashion that can be implemented by the city.[non-primary source needed] HunchBuzz is another example which has been implemented by New Zealand's central government and is being rolled out to local city councils.[non-primary source needed] CitizenLab is a more European-oriented ideation platform on which the citizens co-create their city through ideation and citizen-sourcing challenges.[non-primary source needed] Their approach to civic engagement is through gamification, in order to incentivise citizens to share their input. Citizens.is is a similar solution from Iceland used by governments in several countries.[9][non-primary source needed]

Citizen reporting

The City of Boston provides a Citizens Connect iPhone App that allows constituents to report various services requests, including for removing graffiti, filling potholes, and fixing traffic lights. A similar system, SeeClickFix, has been adopted in a number of cities across the United States.

Disaster response

Online communities of citizens such as the Crisis Commons (see

Person finder), converting satellite imagery into street maps (see, for instance, OpenStreetMap), and reporting and processing actionable citizen reports of needs and damage (see, for instance, the Ushahidi
platform).

During the

COVID-19 pandemic, many countries including Singapore,[10] Australia,[11] Canada,[12] China,[13] Germany[14] and France,[15]
developed apps that relied upon citizens to provide personal details which could be used to track and manage the spread of the virus.

Patent examination

The Peer-to-Patent system enables citizens to assist the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in evaluating the validity of patent applications. Following the implementation of Peer-to-Patent, the USPTO started exploring how to further integrate citizens into the patent application review process. They invited experts to present at two roundtables on using citizen submissions in prior art. Presenters at the roundtables included experienced representatives from Peer-to-Patent, Ask Patents, Patexia, and Article One Partners.[16][17] The USPTO also opened the process up to citizens by requesting public comments and suggestions on how to proceed following each of the two roundtables.

Citizen problem solving

Several U.S. federal agencies run

Environmental Protection Agency.[18][19]

NASA uses crowdsourcing for analyzing some large sets of images, and as part of the Open Government Initiative of the Obama Administration, the General Services Administration collected and amalgamated suggestions for improving federal websites.[19]

The City of

Medellin, Colombia uses the power of the citizens' collective intelligence to identify potential solutions for important problems the city faces. The platform structures problems as open challenges; citizens can ideate, propose, identify, filter and vote on solutions, and the Mayor's office reviews and implements solutions of its choosing.[citation needed
]

Participatory budgeting

Some jurisdictions delegate responsibility for allocating a certain portion of their budget to an assembly of interested citizens. This process is known as participatory budgeting; originating in Brazil, it is now used by thousands of cities around the world.

Research

The first conference focusing on Crowdsourcing for Politics and Policy took place at Oxford University, under the auspices of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2014. Research has emerged since 2012[20] that focuses on the use of crowdsourcing for policy purposes.[21][22] These include the experimental investigation of the use of Virtual Labor Markets for policy assessment,[23] and an assessment of the potential for citizen involvement in process innovation for public administration.[24]

Notes

  1. National Archives
    .
  2. ^ "David Cameron: The next age of government". TED. 2010-02-01.
  3. ^ vTaiwan project homepage
  4. ^ vTaiwan / Using Digital Technology to Write Digital Laws (case study)
  5. ^
    Technology Review
    .
  6. ^ "Taiwan shifts stance, bans online sales of alcohol｜Meet Global". meet-global.bnext.com.tw. Retrieved 2022-04-30.
  7. ^ Granicus
  8. ^ Speak Up Austin
  9. ^ Citizens.is homepage
  10. ^ "Singapore government launches new app for contact tracing to combat spread of COVID-19". MobiHealthNews. 2020-03-20. Retrieved 2020-09-02.
  11. ^ Health, Australian Government Department of (2020-04-24). "COVIDSafe app". Australian Government Department of Health. Retrieved 2020-09-02.
  12. ^ Canada, Health (2020-09-01). "Download COVID Alert: Canada's exposure notification app". aem. Retrieved 2020-09-02.
  13. ^ "China launches coronavirus 'close contact detector' app". BBC News. 2020-02-11. Retrieved 2020-09-02.
  14. ^ Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. "Germany launches 'best' coronavirus tracing app | DW | 16.06.2020". DW.COM. Retrieved 2020-09-02.
  15. ^ France, Connexion. "France StopCovid app: How it works and how to get it". www.connexionfrance.com. Retrieved 2020-09-02.
  16. ^ announcements, patent. "Roundtable on the Use of Crowdsourcing and Third-Party Preissuance Submissions to Identify Relevant Prior Art". www.uspto.gov. Archived from the original on 2015-10-25. Retrieved 2015-10-30.
  17. ^ Patents. "Roundtable on USPTO Use of Crowdsourcing to Identify Relevant Prior Art". www.uspto.gov. Retrieved 2015-10-30.
  18. ^ http://challenge.gov/
  19. ^
    ISBN 978-951-53-3459-6
    .
  20. ISBN 978-951-53-3459-6
    .
  21. ^ Prpić, J.; Taeihagh, A.; Melton, J. (2014). "Crowdsourcing the Policy Cycle. Collective Intelligence 2014, MIT Center for Collective Intelligence" (PDF). Humancomputation.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-06-24. Retrieved 2015-07-02.
  22. ^ Prpić, J.; Taeihagh, A.; Melton, J. (2014). "A Framework for Policy Crowdsourcing. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford - IPP 2014 - Crowdsourcing for Politics and Policy" (PDF). Ipp.oxii.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 2018-10-02.
  23. ^ Prpić, J.; Taeihagh, A.; Melton, J. (2014). "Experiments on Crowdsourcing Policy Assessment. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford - IPP 2014 - Crowdsourcing for Politics and Policy" (PDF). Ipp.oii.ox.ac.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-06-24. Retrieved 2015-07-02.
  24. doi:10.3233/IP-150351
    .

External links
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citizen_sourcing&oldid=1218430713"