Collateral ventilation

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A diagram comparing normal alveoli to those with emphysema
Emphysema

Collateral ventilation is a back-up system of alveolar ventilation that can bypass the normal route of airflow when airways are restricted or obstructed. The pathways involved include those between adjacent alveoli (pores of Kohn), between bronchioles and alveoli (canals of Lambert), and those between bronchioles (channels of Martin).[1][2] Collateral ventilation also serves to modulate imbalances in ventilation and perfusion a feature of many diseases.[1] The pathways are altered in lung diseases particularly asthma, and emphysema.[3] A similar functional pattern of collateralisation is seen in the circulatory system of the heart.[4]

Interlobar collateral ventilation has also been noted and is a major unwanted factor in the consideration of

lung volume reduction procedures.[5]

Pathways

In normal respiratory conditions, airflow is through the pathway of least resistance offered by the bronchial tree, to the alveoli and back to the bronchi and trachea.

lobes have been described as interlobular channels and between segments as intersegmental.[2][1]

Anatomy

The interalveolar pores of Kohn are epithelial-lined openings between adjacent alveoli, with a diameter of between three and thirteen

macrophages.[1] There are between 13 and 21 pores in each alveolus and about half of these are found on the bottom walls. Their average length is from 7 to 19 μm.[6] It has been suggested that the pores of Kohn are too small to offer a pathway of decreased resistance, and that the larger interbronchiolar channels of Martin are the primary site of collateral ventilation.[3]

The bronchoalveolar canals of Lambert were described by Lambert as communications that reached from respiratory bronchioles to the alveolar ducts and sacs that they supplied. These canals have a muscular wall with possible regional airflow control. They range in size from partly closed to 30 μm.[6]

The interbronchiolar channels of Martin have a diameter of 30 μm and are found between

terminal bronchioles of adjacent segments.[6] The diameter of these channels is given as between 80 and 150 μm in other sources.[7][1]

Interlobular channels have been described as short and tubular with a diameter of 200 μm.[1]

Clinical significance

The presence of interlobar collateral ventilation will affect the choice of

lung volume reduction procedure that may be offered in severe cases of emphysema. Emphysema usually develops in later years from the breakdown of alveolar walls resulting in much larger airspaces and much larger pathways for a preferential route of collateral ventilation. Ageing can alter the size of the pores of Kohn, further reducing the normal resistance of the collateral ventilation pathways.[3][8] In lung volume reduction procedures interlobular collateral ventilation is a major factor that can affect a successful outcome.[1] A study showed that those with emphysema had a ten-fold increase of collateral ventilation over healthy controls.[9]

The intent of lung volume reduction is to achieve the complete collapse (

lung fissures that separate the lobes of the lung are fairly common and usually without consequence. These fissures are often bridged by parenchyma connecting the airspaces of one lobe with those of another and therefore providing a path for collateral ventilation. This type of parenchymal bridging would prevent the intended collapse of a targeted lobe. Interlobar collateral ventilation precludes the bronchoscopic procedure that uses endobronchial valves.[10]

History

The pores of Kohn were described over a hundred years ago in 1893 but their functional relevance was disputed. It was only in 1931 that they were acknowledged as acting as collaterals, and the term collateral respiration was first used. In 1955 Lambert described accessory communicating channels between respiratory bronchioles and the alveoli, known as the canals of Lambert.

Other animals

Collateral ventilation is not present in horses who have a poor tolerance to airway obstruction but it is present in dogs who have a better tolerance for obstruction.[11]

References