Comparison of Chernobyl and other radioactivity releases
This article needs to be updated.(May 2012) |
This article compares the radioactivity release and decay from the Chernobyl disaster with various other events which involved a release of uncontrolled radioactivity.
Chernobyl compared to background radiation
Natural sources of radiation are very prevalent in the environment, and come from cosmic rays, food sources (bananas have a particular high source due to potassium-40 but all foods contain carbon and thereby carbon-14), radon gas, granite and other dense rocks, and others. The banana equivalent dose is sometimes used in science communication to visualize different levels of ionizing radiation. The collective radiation background dose for natural sources in Europe is about 500,000 man-Sieverts per year. The total dose from Chernobyl is estimated at 80,000 man-sieverts, or roughly 1/6 as much.[1] However, some individuals, particularly in areas adjacent the reactor, received significantly higher doses.
Chernobyl's radiation was detectable across Western Europe. Average doses received ranged from 0.02
Chernobyl compared with an atomic bomb
Far fewer people died as an immediate result of the Chernobyl event than the immediate deaths
"Compared with other nuclear events: The Chernobyl explosion put 400 times more radioactive material into the Earth's atmosphere than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima; atomic weapons tests conducted in the 1950s and 1960s all together are estimated to have put some 100 to 1,000 times more radioactive material into the atmosphere than the Chernobyl accident."[4]
The radioactivity released at Chernobyl tended to be more long-lived than that released by a bomb detonation hence it is not possible to draw a simple comparison between the two events. Also, a dose of radiation spread over many years (as is the case with Chernobyl) is much less harmful than the same dose received over a short period.
The relative size of the Chernobyl release when compared with the release due to a hypothetical ground burst of a bomb similar to the Fat Man device dropped on Nagasaki.
Isotope | Ratio between the release due to the bomb and the Chernobyl accident |
---|---|
90Sr | 1:87 |
137Cs | 1:890 |
131I | 1:25 |
133Xe | 1:31 |
A comparison of the gamma dose rates due to the Chernobyl accident and the hypothetical nuclear weapon.
The graph of dose rate as a function of time for the bomb fallout was done using a method similar to that of T. Imanaka, S. Fukutani, M. Yamamoto, A. Sakaguchi and M. Hoshi, J. Radiation Research, 2006, 47, Suppl A121-A127. Our graph exhibits the same shape as that obtained in the paper. The bomb fallout graph is for a
A
Chernobyl compared with Tomsk-7
The release of radioactivity which occurred at
- 106Ru 7.9 TBq
- 103Ru 340 GBq
- 95Nb 11.2 TBq
- 95Zr 5.1 TBq
- 137Cs 505 GBq (estimated from the IAEA data)
- 141Ce 370 GBq
- 144Ce 240 GBq
- 125Sb 100 GBq
- 239Pu 5.2 GBq
The very short-lived isotopes such as 140Ba and 131I were absent from this mixture, and the long-lived 137Cs was only at a small concentration. This is because it is not able to enter the
The size of the radioactive release at Tomsk-7 was much smaller, and while it caused moderate environmental contamination it did not cause any early deaths.
Chernobyl compared to Fukushima Daiichi
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (March 2014) |
Chernobyl compared with the Goiânia accident
While both events released 137Cs, the isotopic signature for the Goiânia accident was much simpler.[7] It was a single isotope which has a half-life of about 30 years. To show how the activity vs. time graph for a single isotope differs from the dose rate due to Chernobyl (in the open air) the following chart is shown with calculated data for a hypothetical release of 106Ru.
Chernobyl compared with the Three Mile Island accident
Three Mile Island-2 was an accident of a completely different type from Chernobyl. However, both accidents have vague similarities.
Chernobyl was a design flaw-caused power excursion causing a steam explosion resulting in a graphite fire, uncontained, which lofted radioactive smoke high into the atmosphere; TMI was a slow, undetected leak - caused by the technical malfunction of a pilot-operated relief valve - which lowered the water level around the nuclear fuel, resulting in over a third of it shattering when refilled rapidly with coolant.
Similar to Chernobyl, operator error played a role but did not directly cause the accident. Both accidents had grueling and costly cleanup efforts. Chernobyl and TMI's unaffected reactors were restarted and continued operation until 2000 and 2019, respectively.
Unlike Chernobyl, TMI-2's reactor vessel did not fail and contained almost all of the radioactive material. Containment at TMI was not breached. On the day of the accident, a small "hydrogen burn" occurred inside the reactor building, but it was not enough to affect normal operation of the reactor itself.
Following the accident, an estimated 44,000 curies of radioactive gases - particularly Krypton-85 - from the leak were vented into the atmosphere through specially designed filters under operator control. A government report concluded that the accident caused no increase in cancer rates for local residents.[8]
Chernobyl compared with criticality accidents
During the time between the start of the
- Press release on a report on criticality accidents from Los Alamos National Laboratory
- List of radiation accidents
- U.S. report from 1971 on criticality accidents to date
Process accidents
In the first class (process accidents) during the processing of
These accidents tend to lead to very high doses due to direct
Reactor accidents
In this type of accident a reactor or other critical assembly releases far more fission power than was expected, or it becomes critical at the wrong moment in time. The series of examples of such events include one in an experimental facility in
accident (RIA, power surge in an experimental nuclear reactor in Idaho, 1961) failed to release much radioactivity outside the building in which it occurred.See also
- Church Rock uranium mill spill
- Comparison of Fukushima and Chernobyl nuclear accidents
- Effects of the Chernobyl disaster
- Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster
- Mayak explosion
- International Nuclear Event Scale
- Nuclear power debate
- List of Chernobyl-related articles
- Chernobyl
References
- ^ S2CID 189914132.
- ^ Health effects of the Chernobyl accident: an overview
- PMID 16628547.
- ^ This is written in page 8(9) of "Ten years after Chernobyl: What do we really know?" of the PDF official document: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/058/28058918.pdf
- .
- ^ The Radiological Accident in the Reprocessing Plant at Tomsk - IAEA Publications
- ^ IAEA Publications – Details
- ^ "Three Mile Island". Washingtonpost.com. 1990-09-01. Retrieved 2014-02-04.
- ^ World Nuclear Association Archived 2006-09-23 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ NRC.gov
- ^ The criticality accident in Sarov