Embryonal fyn-associated substrate

This article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding peer-reviewed article was published in the journal Gene. Click to view.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
EFS
Identifiers
Gene ontology
Molecular function
Cellular component
Biological process
Sources:Amigo / QuickGO
Ensembl
UniProt
RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_001277174
NM_005864
NM_032459
NM_001385607

NM_010112

RefSeq (protein)

NP_001264103
NP_005855
NP_115835

NP_034242

Location (UCSC)n/an/a
PubMed search[1][2]
Wikidata
View/Edit HumanView/Edit Mouse

Embryonal fyn-associated substrate is a protein that in humans is encoded by the EFS gene. It is also known as CASS3.[3]

History and discovery

EFS (Embryonal Fyn-associated Substrate), also known as SIN (Src INteracting or Signal Integrating protein) was originally identified using cDNA library screening of mouse embryonal libraries for proteins containing

SRC SH3 domain, in two independent studies by Ishino et al.[4] in 1995 and Alexandropoulos et al.[5]
in 1996.

In humans, the 561 amino acid EFS protein acts as a scaffolding protein for cell signaling based on interactions with

FAK, and other proteins, and has been linked to roles in the function of the immune system, and the development of cancer
.

Gene

The chromosomal location of the EFS gene is 14q11.2 and its genomic coordinates are 14:23356400-23365633 on the reverse strand in GRChB38p2 (Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 38 patch release 2).

Ensembl
).

In humans, at least three transcript variants are known for EFS: isoform 1, containing 6 exons end encoding the full-length protein with 561 amino acids; isoform 2, containing 5 exons and encoding a shorter protein (468 amino acids in length); and isoform 3, containing 6 exons and encoding the shortest protein (392 amino acids).

Little is known about the

17β-estradiol and progesterone in explants of late proliferative phase endometrium.[11]

Protein family

EFS is a member of the CAS (

fungi, diploblasts and nematodes such as C. elegans. A single ancestral member is found in Drosophila.[13]

Structure

Table 1. EFS structure.
Domain Position Length Function
N-terminal 1 - 4 4 aa This region has no assigned function
SH3-domain 5-68 64 aa Binds to proline-rich motif containing proteins, such as
PTP1B,[18] CIZ[19] and FRNK.[20]
SH2-binding region 69 - 350 282 aa Contains YxxP motifs capable of being phosphorylated on tyrosine residues, then binding SH2 domains.
Serine rich domain 351 - 488 138 aa Conserved domain structure encompassing 4 α-helices bundle has a docking function.
C-terminal 489 - 561 73 aa Conserved domain structure encompassing 4 α-helices bundle has a docking function; homo- or heterodimerization; focal adhesion targeting.

As the member of CAS protein family, EFS shares common structural characteristics with other members of the family. This includes 4 defined domains (summarized in Table 1):

There are three protein isoforms of human Efs. hEfs1 and hEfs2 were identified by Ishino et al.[7] hEFS1 (561 aa) represents the human counterpart of mouse embryonal Efs (mEfs1) originally identified. hEFS1 and mEfs1 are 80% identical in their amino acid sequences and 100% identical within the SH3 domain. hEFS2 (468 aa) is identical to hEFS1, except for its lack of the SH3 domain. hEFS3 (392 aa) also lacks a functional SH3 domain and has the same C-terminus and short N-terminal amino acid tail as the full-length protein.[24][25] Although little functional analysis of hEFS2 has been performed, speculatively, given lack of an SH3 domain, abundant hEFS2 may inhibit hEFS1 signaling by titrating partner proteins.[7] As of 2015, there has been no functional analysis of hEFS3.

Function

Figure 1. Scheme, representing major proteins interacting with EFS through highly conserved motifs.

As a member of the CAS protein family, EFS is a multi-domain docking molecule that lacks any known enzymatic activity, but instead mediates signaling by promoting protein–protein interactions through conserved sequence motifs (Figure 1).[7][26][27]

An important role of EFS as a CAS-family member function is transmission of

CRK proteins and C3G, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for RAP1.[31] PTP-PEST, a soluble protein tyrosine phosphatase that is ubiquitously expressed in mice both during embryonic development and in adult tissues, opposes FAK and PTK2B activity, as it dephosphorylates PTK2B, FAK and CAS family members, among other proteins.[32] The PTP-PEST proline-rich sequence 332PPKPPR337 has been shown to interact directly with the SH3 domain of members of EFS and another CAS protein, NEDD9.[33]

In normal untransformed cells, EFS acts as a

E-cadherin at adherens junctions, a function that has been reported for other CAS proteins (NEDD9 and BCAR1);[35]
however, this point has not been directly established for EFS.

Disease association

The well-studied CAS proteins BCAR1 and NEDD9 have important roles in cancer and other pathological conditions, which have been addressed in many studies and reviews.[12][27][30][36][37] EFS has attracted less study. However, the conserved functional properties of EFS relevant to cellular adhesion and migration, and RTK signaling, suggest changes in activity of this protein may also be relevant to cancer and other disease states, influencing prognosis and therapeutic response. The changes in EFS expression and post-translational modification in the context of disease discussed below are summarized in Table 2.

Disease Study finding for EFS
Crohn's disease The study linked EFS gene to Crohn's disease (p-value 0.039) in humans.[38]
Rheumatic fever susceptibility Significantly increased expression after stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with rheumatoid heart disease.[39]
Prostate cancer CpG site hypermethylation of EFS was associated with prediction of biochemical, local, and systemic recurrence of prostate cancer.[40] Decreased EFS expression was shown in advanced prostate cancer compared to normal tissue, which correlated with high metastatic potential.[41]
Uveal melanoma High frequency of promoter CpG site methylation and association with a higher risk of metastatic progression.[24]
EFS may play a role in trastuzumab resistance mechanism.[42]
Prolactinoma EFS may be involved in stem cell regulation, tumor cell invasion, tumor recurrence, and drug resistance.[43]
Gestational choriocarcinoma Located in a frequently amplified chromosomal region along with >100 other genes.[44]
Glioblastoma multiforme
One of the genes differentially expressed in two sub-groups of
glioblastoma multiforme defined by gene expression profile.[45]
Chediak-Higashi syndrome Direct interaction with
LYST protein, which is associated with lysosomal trafficking.[25]
Human endometrium expression profiling Down regulated by
17β-estradiol and progesterone in explants of late proliferative phase endometrium.[11]

Role in inflammation and T-Cell function

EFS regulates

T-cell function and maturation, preventing expansion of autoreactive clones and pathological immune responses. Two studies that have reported that EFS expression in medullar thymus epithelial cells is important for negative selection of T-cells during their development,[8][9][10]
which implies an important role of EFS in maintaining immune homeostasis and autoimmunity prevention. In these studies, mice with defective EFS progressed normally during embryogenesis but then developed massive inflammatory lesions in multiple tissues that bore a striking histological resemblance to inflammatory bowel diseases such as Crohn's disease. Mechanistically, EFS expressed in medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) is crucial for their functional maturation and growth factor-mediated expansion. mTECs are important for proper T-cell maturation and negative selection of autoreactive clones, required for development of immunological self-tolerance.

EFS has mostly a repressive role of EFS on processes associated with the activation of mature T-cells, including IL-2 pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and IL-2-dependent clonal expansion of T cells.[9][46] Upon T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation, EFS dephosphorylation and release of the SRC family kinase FYN and phospholipase C-γ normally lead to self-limitation of the immune response. Consistent with this mechanism, EFS overexpression in T cell-derived cell lines decreased IL-2 concentration in supernatants in response to TCR stimulation,[46] while T cells derived from mice lacking EFS gene showed increased IL-2 production.[9] A dual role of EFS in mature T cells function has been proposed because both overexpression and siRNA knockdown of this protein in cell models resulted in decreased transcriptional activation of IL-2 dependent promoters following TCR stimulation.[46]

Altered EFS function has been associated with various human immunopathological conditions. Although an initial genome-wide association studies (GWAS) study of Crohn's disease did not identify EFS,[47] EFS single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were subsequently linked to Crohn's disease.[38] SNPs linked to EFS are trans-acting, potentially affecting the level of EFS expression but not its coding sequence.[48]

Another study suggested that EFS might contribute to acute

group A streptococci
(GAS) strains. EFS was one of only four genes with significantly increased expression in both arms of the study: 1) RHD patient versus control PBMCs after stimulation of both groups with rheumatogenic GAS and 2) RHD patient PBMC stimulated with rheumatogenic versus non-rheumatogenic GAS. Another study has implicated EFS in the
LYST
(lysosomal trafficking regulator, aka CHS1 - Chediak-Higashi syndrome 1), a large protein that regulates the intracellular trafficking of proteins through endosomes that is mutated in CHS. These results may imply the role of EFS as a disease progression modifier, although further testing and establishment of mechanism is necessary.

Cancer

At the level of EFS mRNA expression, the local and systemic recurrence of

Gleason score prostate cancer samples.[50] Low EFS expression also correlated with malignant behavior of the PC-3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells.[41]

In another study, methylation of the EFS CpG island was observed in 69% of cases of uveal melanoma (UM) and only UM with EFS methylation gave rise to metastases.[24] RT-PCR expression analysis revealed a significant inverse correlation between EFS mRNA expression with EFS methylation in UM. EFS methylation was tissue-specific with full methylation in peripheral blood cells, but no methylation in other tissues such as fetal muscle, kidney and brain.

The EFS gene is one of more than 100 of the genes located in a centromeric 10.21 Mb "minimal critical region" on Chromosome 14 that are highly expressed in

glioblastoma multiforme as identified by gene expression profiles (GEPs).[45]
EFS was differentially expressed in the GEP1 and GEP3 groups, which were associated with worse prognosis, with more significant cytogenetic abnormalities and genomic instabilities observed in this groups.

At the level of the EFS protein, a study of BT474

malignant melanoma, EFS phosphorylation and activity significantly decreased (p<0.05) in response to vemurafenib treatment in BRAF wild-type melanoma tumors comparing to ones with BRAF (V600E-vemurfenib resistant) mutation.[51] Finally, in a 2013 study of castration-resistant prostate cancer, EFS was identified as having significantly increased gross phosphorylation levels in samples from androgen-deprived (AD), long-term AD treated, or castration-resistant prostate carcinoma xenografts, versus in androgen deprivation therapy-naıve xenografts[52]

Clinical significance

Based on the above discussion, it is possible that therapeutic benefits can be achieved by using EFS expression or phosphorylation as a marker of disease progression and prognosis in some forms of cancer. Further assessment of EFS expression, mutational status, and potential polymorphic variants may be of use in understanding the biology and developing treatment strategies for immune system pathologies such as CHS. There are currently no therapeutic approaches targeting EFS, and given the protein lacks a catalytic domain and extracellular moieties, it may be challenging to generate such agents.

Notes

References