Five precepts
Buddhist devotional practices |
---|
Devotional |
|
Holidays |
Precepts |
|
Other |
|
Translations of five precepts | |
---|---|
Tibetan | བསླབ་པ་ལྔ་ bslab pa lnga |
Tagalog | Limang utos (Baybayin: ᜎᜒᜋᜅ᜔ ᜂᜆᜓ︀ᜐ᜔) |
Thai | เบญจศีล, ศีล ๕ (RTGS: Benchasin, Sin Ha) |
Vietnamese | 五戒 Ngũ giới |
Glossary of Buddhism |
The five precepts (
The five precepts were common to the religious milieu of 6th-century BCE India, but the Buddha's focus on
Undertaking and upholding the five precepts is based on the principle of
- The first precept consists of a prohibition of killing, both humans and all animals. Scholars have interpreted Buddhist texts about the precepts as an opposition to and prohibition of capital punishment,[8] suicide, abortion[9][10] and euthanasia.[11] In practice, however, many Buddhist countries still use the death penalty. With regard to abortion, Buddhist countries take the middle ground, by condemning though not prohibiting it fully. The Buddhist attitude to violence is generally interpreted as opposing all warfare, but some scholars have raised exceptions found in later texts.
- The second precept prohibits theft and related activities such as fraud and forgery.
- The third precept refers to sexual misconduct, and has been defined by modern teachers with terms such as sexual responsibility and long-term commitment.
- The fourth precept involves falsehood spoken or committed to by action, as well as malicious speech, harsh speech and gossip.
- The fifth precept prohibits intoxication through alcohol, drugs, or other means.[12][13] Early Buddhist Texts nearly always condemn alcohol, and so do Chinese Buddhist post-canonical texts. Smoking is sometimes also included here. Unlike other lay precepts such as abstinence from killing, theft, sexual misconduct, and ill-speech, the outlook on intoxication is much more forgiving. In the Sarakani sutta,[14] the Buddha is said to proclaim that Sarakani who 'took to drink' has attained stream-entry and was bound for Nirvana, on the basis that such a person merely even holds some of the Dharma in affectionate regard, even if they did not unwaveringly believe in the Buddha's Dharma.
In modern times, traditional Buddhist countries have seen revival movements to promote the five precepts. As for the West, the precepts play a major role in Buddhist organizations. They have also been integrated into mindfulness training programs, though many mindfulness specialists do not support this because of the precepts' religious import. Lastly, many conflict prevention programs make use of the precepts.
Role in Buddhist doctrine
Buddhist scriptures explain the five precepts as the minimal standard of Buddhist morality.
Comparing different parts of Buddhist doctrine, the five precepts form the basis of the
In conclusion, the five precepts lie at the foundation of all Buddhist practice, and in that respect, can be compared with the
History
The five precepts were part of
In some schools of ancient Indic Buddhism, Buddhist devotees could choose to adhere to only a number of precepts, instead of the complete five. The schools that would survive in later periods, however, that is Theravāda and Mahāyāna Buddhism, were both ambiguous about this practice. Some early Mahāyāna texts allow it, but some do not;
The prohibition on killing had motivated early Buddhists to form a stance against animal sacrifice, a common religious ritual practice in ancient India.[38][39] According to the Pāli Canon, however, early Buddhists did not adopt a vegetarian lifestyle.[26][39]
In
In China, the five precepts were introduced in the first centuries CE, both in their śrāvakayāna and bodhisattva formats.
Ceremonies
In Pāli tradition
In the Theravāda tradition, the precepts are recited in a standardized fashion, using
"Venerables, we request the five precepts and the
three refuges [i.e. the triple gem] for the sake of observing them, one by one, separately". (Mayaṃ bhante visuṃ visuṃ rakkhaṇatthāya tisaraṇena saha pañca sīlāniyācāma.)[47]
After this, the monk administering the precepts will recite a reverential line of text to introduce the ceremony, after which he guides the lay people in declaring that they take their refuge in the three refuges or triple gem.[48]
He then continues with reciting the five precepts:[49][50]
- "I undertake the training-precept to abstain from onslaught on breathing beings." (Pali: Pāṇātipātā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.)
- "I undertake the training-precept to abstain from taking what is not given." (Pali: Adinnādānā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.)
- "I undertake the training-precept to abstain from sexual misconduct." (Pali: Kāmesumicchācāra veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.)
- "I undertake the training-precept to abstain from false speech." (Pali: Musāvādā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.)
- "I undertake the training-precept to abstain from alcoholic drink or drugs that are an opportunity for heedlessness." (Pali: Surāmerayamajjapamādaṭṭhānā veramaṇī sikkhāpadaṃ samādiyāmi.)
After the lay people have repeated the five precepts after the monk, the monk will close the ceremony reciting:
"These five precepts lead with good behavior to bliss, with good behavior to wealth and success, they lead with good behavior to happiness, therefore purify behavior." (Imāni pañca sikkhāpadāni. Sīlena sugatiṃ yanti, sīlena bhogasampadā, sīlena nibbutiṃ yanti, tasmā sīlaṃ visodhaye.)[51]
In other textual traditions
The format of the ceremony for taking the precepts occurs several times in the
One formula of the precepts can be found in the Treatise on Taking Refuge and the Precepts (simplified Chinese: 归戒要集; traditional Chinese: 歸戒要集; pinyin: Guījiè Yāojí):
- As all Buddhas refrained from killing until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from killing until the end of my life.
- As all Buddhas refrained from stealing until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from stealing until the end of my life.
- As all Buddhas refrained from sexual misconduct until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from sexual misconduct until the end of my life.
- As all Buddhas refrained from false speech until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from false speech until the end of my life.
- As all Buddhas refrained from alcohol until the end of their lives, so I too will refrain from alcohol until the end of my life.[53]
Similarly, in the
Principles
Precept | Accompanying virtues[12][26] | Related to human rights[54][55] |
---|---|---|
1. Abstention from killing living beings
|
Kindness and compassion | Right to life |
2. Abstention from theft | Generosity and renunciation
|
Right of property |
3. Abstention from sexual misconduct | Contentment and respect for faithfulness | Right to fidelity in marriage |
4. Abstention from speaking lies (falsehood) | Being honest and dependable | Right of human dignity |
5. Abstention from intoxication | Mindfulness and responsibility
|
Right of security and safety |
The five precepts can be found in many places in the Early Buddhist Texts.[56] The precepts are regarded as means to building good character, or as an expression of such character. The Pāli Canon describes them as means to avoid harm to oneself and others.[57] It further describes them as gifts toward oneself and others.[58] Moreover, the texts say that people who uphold them will be confident in any gathering of people,[16][59] will have wealth and a good reputation, and will die a peaceful death, reborn in heaven[49][59] or as a human being. On the other hand, living a life in violation of the precepts is believed to lead to rebirth in an unhappy destination.[16] They are understood as principles that define a person as human in body and mind.[60]
The precepts are normative rules, but are formulated and understood as "undertakings"
"For a state that is not pleasant or delightful to me must be so to him also; and a state that is not pleasing or delightful to me, how could I inflict that upon another?"[69]
In other words, all living beings are alike in that they want to be happy and not suffer. Comparing oneself with others, one should therefore not hurt others as one would not want to be hurt.
In the upholding or violation of the precepts,
Upholding the precepts is sometimes distinguished in three levels: to uphold them without having formally undertaken them; to uphold them formally, willing to sacrifice one's own life for it; and finally, to spontaneously uphold them.
Practice in general
Lay followers often undertake these training rules in the same ceremony as they
The five precepts are at the core of Buddhist morality.[50] In field studies in some countries like Sri Lanka, villagers describe them as the core of the religion.[80] Anthropologist Barend Terwiel found in his fieldwork that most Thai villagers knew the precepts by heart, and many, especially the elderly, could explain the implications of the precepts following traditional interpretations.[81]
However, Buddhists vary in how strict they follow them.
In East Asian Buddhism, the precepts are intrinsically connected with the initiation as a Buddhist lay person. Early Chinese translations such as the Upāsaka-śila Sūtra hold that the precepts should only be ritually transmitted by a monastic. The texts describe that in the ritual the power of the Buddhas and bodhisattvas is transmitted, and helps the initiate to keep the precepts. This "lay ordination" ritual usually occurs after a stay in a temple, and often after a
In the Theravāda tradition, the precepts are usually taken "each separately" (Pali: visuṃ visuṃ), to indicate that if one precept should be broken, the other precepts are still intact. In very solemn occasions, or for very pious devotees, the precepts may be taken as a group rather than each separately.[91][92] This does not mean, however, that only some of the precepts can be undertaken; they are always committed to as a complete set.[93] In East Asian Buddhism, however, the vow of taking the precepts is considered a solemn matter, and it is not uncommon for lay people to undertake only the precepts that they are confident they can keep.[37] The act of taking a vow to keep the precepts is what makes it karmically effective: Spiro found that someone who did not violate the precepts, but did not have any intention to keep them either, was not believed to accrue any religious merit. On the other hand, when people took a vow to keep the precepts, and then broke them afterwards, the negative karma was considered larger than in the case no vow was taken to keep the precepts.[94]
Several modern teachers such as
First precept
Textual analysis
The first precept prohibits the taking of life of a
The description of the first precept can be interpreted as a prohibition of capital punishment.
Ordering another person to kill is also included in this precept,
Interpretations of how Buddhist texts regard warfare are varied, but in general Buddhist doctrine is considered to oppose all warfare. In many Jātaka tales, such as that of
In practice
Field studies in Cambodia and Burma have shown that many Buddhists considered the first precept the most important, or the most blamable.
Early Buddhists did not adopt a
Furthermore, among some schools of Buddhism, there has been some debate with regard to a principle in the monastic discipline. This principle states that a Buddhist monk cannot accept meat if it comes from animals especially slaughtered for him. Some teachers have interpreted this to mean that when the recipient has no knowledge on whether the animal has been killed for him, he cannot accept the food either. Similarly, there has been debate as to whether laypeople should be vegetarian when adhering to the five precepts.
Apart from trade in flesh or living beings, there are also other professions considered undesirable. Vietnamese teacher Thich Nhat Hanh gives a list of examples, such as working in the arms industry, the military, police, producing or selling poison or drugs such as alcohol and tobacco.[127]
In general, the first precept has been interpreted by Buddhists as a call for non-violence and pacifism. But there have been some exceptions of people who did not interpret the first precept as an opposition to war. For example, in the twentieth century, some Japanese Zen teachers wrote in support of violence in war, and some of them argued this should be seen as a means to uphold the first precept.
Although capital punishment goes against the first precept, as of 2001, many countries in Asia still maintained the death penalty, including Sri Lanka, Thailand, China and Taiwan. In some Buddhist countries, such as Sri Lanka and Thailand, capital punishment was applied during some periods, while during other periods no capital punishment was used at all. In other countries with Buddhism, like China and Taiwan, Buddhism, or any religion for that matter, has had no influence in policy decisions of the government. Countries with Buddhism that have abolished capital punishment include Cambodia and Hong Kong.[129]
In general, Buddhist traditions oppose abortion.
Second precept
Textual analysis
The second precept prohibits theft, and involves the intention to steal what one perceives as not belonging to oneself ("what is not given") and acting successfully upon that intention. The severity of the act of theft is judged by the worth of the owner and the worth of that which is stolen. Underhand dealings, fraud, cheating and forgery are also included in this precept.
In practice
The second precept includes different ways of stealing and fraud. Borrowing without permission is sometimes included,[63][81] as well as gambling.[81][134] Psychologist Vanchai Ariyabuddhiphongs did studies in the 2000s and 2010s in Thailand and discovered that people who did not adhere to the five precepts more often tended to believe that money was the most important goal in life, and would more often pay bribes than people who did adhere to the precepts.[135][136] On the other hand, people who observed the five precepts regarded themselves as wealthier and happier than people who did not observe the precepts.[137]
Professions that are seen to violate the second precept include working in the gambling industry or marketing products that are not actually required for the customer.[138]
Third precept
Textual analysis
The third precept condemns sexual misconduct. This has been interpreted in classical texts to include any form of sexual misconduct, which would therefore include inappropriate touching and speech, with a married or engaged person, fornication, rape, incest, sex with a minor (under 18 years, or a person "protected by any relative"), and sex with a prostitute.[139] In later texts, details such as intercourse at an inappropriate time or inappropriate place are also counted as breaches of the third precept.[140] Masturbation goes against the spirit of the precept, because of wrongful fantasy. As a manner of uncelibacy, it is not prohibited for laypeople.[141][142]
The third precept is explained as preventing profound spiritual damage to oneself and others. The transgression is regarded as more severe if the other person is a good person.[141][142] Virtues that go hand-in-hand with the third precept are contentment, especially with one's partner,[26][102] and recognition and respect for faithfulness in a marriage, and respect for the sexual nature of oneself and others.[13]
In practice
The third precept is interpreted as avoiding harm to another by using sexuality in the wrong way. This means not engaging with inappropriate partners, but also respecting one's personal commitment to a relationship.[63] In some traditions, the precept also condemns adultery with a person whose spouse agrees with the act, since the nature of the act itself is condemned. Furthermore, flirting with a married person may also be regarded as a violation.[81][139] Though prostitution is discouraged in the third precept, it is usually not actively prohibited by Buddhist teachers.[143] With regard to applications of the principles of the third precept, the precept, or any Buddhist principle for that matter, is usually not connected with a stance against contraception.[144][145] In traditional Buddhist societies such as Sri Lanka, pre-marital sex is considered to violate the precept, though this is not always adhered to by people who already intend to marry.[142][146]
In the interpretation of modern teachers, the precept includes any person in a sexual or a dependent relationship, for example as someone's child, with another person, as they define the precept by terms such as sexual responsibility and long-term commitment.[139] Some modern teachers include masturbation as a violation of the precept,[147] others include certain professions, such as those that involve sexual exploitation, prostitution or pornography, and professions that promote unhealthy sexual behavior, such as in the entertainment industry.[138]
Fourth precept
Textual analysis
The fourth precept involves falsehood spoken or committed to by action.
In practice
The fourth precept includes avoidance of lying and harmful speech.[152] Some modern teachers such as Thich Nhat Hanh interpret this to include avoiding spreading false news and uncertain information.[147] Work that involves data manipulation, false advertising or online scams can also be regarded as violations.[138] Terwiel reports that among Thai Buddhists, the fourth precept is also seen to be broken when people insinuate, exaggerate or speak abusively or deceitfully.[81]
Fifth precept
Textual analysis
The fifth precept prohibits intoxication through alcohol, drugs or other means, and its virtues are
In practice
The fifth precept is regarded as important, because drinking alcohol is condemned for the sluggishness and lack of self-control it leads to,[73][158] which might lead to breaking the other precepts.[19] In Spiro's field studies, violating the fifth precept was seen as the worst of all the five precepts by half of the monks interviewed, citing the harmful consequences.[19] Nevertheless, in practice it is often disregarded by lay people.[159] In Thailand, drinking alcohol is fairly common, even drunkenness.[160] Among Tibetans, drinking beer is common, though this is only slightly alcoholic.[156] Medicinal use of alcohol is generally not frowned upon,[146] and in some countries like Thailand and Laos, smoking is usually not regarded as a violation of the precept. Thai and Laotian monks have been known to smoke, though monks who have received more training are less likely to smoke.[44][161] On a similar note, as of 2000, no Buddhist country prohibited the sale or consumption of alcohol, though in Sri Lanka Buddhist revivalists unsuccessfully attempted to get a full prohibition passed in 1956.[44] Moreover, pre-Communist Tibet used to prohibit smoking in some areas of the capital. Monks were prohibited from smoking, and the import of tobacco was banned.[44]
Thich Nhat Hanh also includes mindful consumption in this precept, which consists of unhealthy food, unhealthy entertainment and unhealthy conversations, among others.[138][162]
Present trends
In modern times, adherence to the precepts among Buddhists is less strict than it traditionally was. This is especially true for the third precept. For example, in Cambodia in the 1990s and 2000s, standards with regard to sexual restraint were greatly relaxed.
In many Western Buddhist organizations, the five precepts play a major role in developing ethical guidelines.[166] Furthermore, Buddhist teachers such as Philip Kapleau, Thich Nhat Hanh and Robert Aitken have promoted mindful consumption in the West, based on the five precepts.[162] In another development in the West, some scholars working in the field of mindfulness training have proposed that the five precepts be introduced as a component in such trainings. Specifically, to prevent organizations from using mindfulness training to further an economical agenda with harmful results to its employees, the economy or the environment, the precepts could be used as a standardized ethical framework. As of 2015, several training programs made explicit use of the five precepts as secular, ethical guidelines. However, many mindfulness training specialists consider it problematic to teach the five precepts as part of training programs in secular contexts because of their religious origins and import.[167]
Peace studies scholar Theresa Der-lan Yeh notes that the five precepts address physical, economical, familial and verbal aspects of interaction, and remarks that many conflict prevention programs in schools and communities have integrated the five precepts in their curriculum. On a similar note, peace studies founder Johan Galtung describes the five precepts as the "basic contribution of Buddhism in the creation of peace".[168]
Theory of ethics
Studying lay and monastic ethical practice in traditional Buddhist societies, Spiro argued ethical guidelines such as the five precepts are adhered to as a means to a higher end, that is, a better rebirth or enlightenment. He therefore concluded that Buddhist ethical principles like the five precepts are similar to Western
Comparison with human rights
Keown has argued that the five precepts are very similar to human rights, with regard to subject matter and with regard to their universal nature.[174] Other scholars, as well as Buddhist writers and human rights advocates, have drawn similar comparisons.[55][175] For example, the following comparisons are drawn:
- Keown compares the first precept with the right to life.[54] The Buddhism-informed Cambodian Institute for Human Rights (CIHR) draws the same comparison.[176]
- The second precept is compared by Keown and the CIHR with the right of property.[54][176]
- The third precept is compared by Keown to the "right to fidelity in marriage";[54] the CIHR construes this broadly as "right of individuals and the rights of society".[177]
- The fourth precept is compared by Keown with the "right not to be lied to";[54] the CIHR writes "the right of human dignity".[177]
- Finally, the fifth precept is compared by the CIHR with the right of individual security and a safe society.[177]
Keown describes the relationship between Buddhist precepts and human rights as "look[ing] both ways along the juridical relationship, both to what one is due to do, and to what is due to one".
See also
- Dhammika Sutta
- Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, five principles applied in geopolitics, for which the same term is used
- Five Vows of Jainism
Notes
- ^ Also spelled as pañcasīlani and pañcasikkhāpadani, respectively.[1]
- right mindfulness.[19]
- ^ The 6th century CE Chāndogya Upaniśad contains four principles identical to the Buddhist precepts, but lying is not mentioned.[36] In contemporary Jainism, the fifth principle became "appropriation of any sort".[31]
- ^ This dual meaning in negative formulations is typical for an Indic language like Sanskrit.[65]
- loving-kindness, not "the Hindu notion of non-violence".[67]
- Brahmajala Sutta.
Citations
- ^ a b c d e Terwiel 2012, p. 178.
- ^ Kent 2008, p. 127 n.17.
- ^ Gombrich 1995, p. 77.
- ^ a b c d e f g Getz 2004, p. 673.
- ^ a b Terwiel 2012, pp. 178–79.
- ^ a b Keown 2013b, p. 638.
- ^ a b Wai 2002, p. 4.
- ^ a b Alarid & Wang 2001, pp. 236–37.
- ^ Keown 2016a, p. 213.
- ^ a b Perrett 2000, p. 110.
- ^ a b c Keown 2016b, p. 170.
- ^ a b c d e f g Gwynne 2017, The Buddhist Pancasila.
- ^ a b c d e f Wijayaratna 1990, pp. 166–67.
- ^ "Sarakaani Sutta". Access to Insight. Retrieved 29 February 2024.
- ^ Gowans 2013, p. 440.
- ^ a b c d Goodman, Charles (2017). Ethics in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 8 July 2010.
{{cite book}}
:|website=
ignored (help) - ^ a b Edelglass 2013, p. 479.
- ^ Powers 2013, āryāṣtāṅga-mārga.
- ^ a b c d e Harvey 2000, p. 77.
- ^ Osto 2015.
- ^ McFarlane 1997.
- ^ Wijayaratna 1990, pp. 166–57.
- ^ De Silva 2016, p. 79.
- ^ Keown 2012, p. 31.
- ^ Tambiah 1992, p. 121.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Cozort 2015.
- ^ Cozort & Shields 2018, Dōgen, The Bodhisattva Path according to the Ugra.
- ^ a b Funayama 2004, p. 98.
- ^ Funayama 2004, p. 105.
- ^ Keown 2005, Precepts.
- ^ a b c d Kohn 1994, p. 173.
- ^ Keown 2003, p. 210.
- ^ Cozort & Shields 2018, Precepts in Early and Theravāda Buddhism.
- ^ a b Gombrich 2006, p. 78.
- ^ Kohn 1994, pp. 171, 173.
- ^ Tachibana 1992, p. 58.
- ^ a b Harvey 2000, p. 83.
- ^ a b "Ahiṃsā". The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. Oxford University Press. 1997. Archived from the original on 24 August 2018 – via Encyclopedia.com.
- ^ a b Mcdermott 1989, p. 273.
- ^ Kohn 1994, pp. 173–74.
- ^ Terwiel 2012, pp. 178–79, 205.
- ^ Kohn 1994, pp. 171, 175–76.
- ^ Benn 2005, pp. 214, 223–24, 226, 230–31.
- ^ a b c d Harvey 2000, p. 79.
- ^ Benn 2005, p. 231.
- ^ Kohn 1994, pp. 176–78, 184–85.
- ^ Terwiel 2012, pp. 179–80.
- ^ Terwiel 2012, p. 181.
- ^ a b c Harvey 2000, p. 67.
- ^ a b c d e Ledgerwood 2008, p. 152.
- ^ Terwiel 2012, p. 182.
- ISBN 978-0-9625618-5-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-04-11. Retrieved 2018-08-03."CBETA 電子佛典集成 卍續藏 (X) 第 60 冊 No.1129". Cbeta.org. 30 August 2008. Archived from the originalon 31 July 2012.
- ^ "X60n1129_002 歸戒要集 第2卷". CBETA 電子佛典集成. Cbeta.org. Archived from the original on 24 August 2018.
- ^ a b c d e Keown 2012, p. 33.
- ^ a b Ledgerwood & Un 2010, pp. 540–41.
- ^ Tedesco 2004, p. 91.
- ^ MacKenzie 2017, p. 2.
- ^ Harvey 2000, p. 66.
- ^ a b Tachibana 1992, p. 63.
- ^ Wai 2002, p. 2.
- ^ Gombrich 2006, p. 66.
- ^ Keown 2003, p. 268.
- ^ a b c d Meadow 2006, p. 88.
- ^ a b c d e Buswell 2004.
- ^ Keown 1998, pp. 399–400.
- ^ a b Keown 2013a, p. 616.
- ^ a b c Spiro 1982, p. 45.
- ^ Harvey 2000, pp. 33, 71.
- ^ Harvey 2000, p. 33.
- ^ Harvey 2000, p. 120.
- ^ Ratanakul 2007, p. 241.
- ^ Horigan 1996, p. 276.
- ^ a b c Mcdermott 1989, p. 275.
- ^ Keown 1998, p. 386.
- ^ a b c d Leaman 2000, p. 139.
- ^ Leaman 2000, p. 141.
- ^ Keown 2003, p. 1.
- ^ De Silva 2016, p. 63.
- The Gale Group. 2004. Archivedfrom the original on 23 December 2017 – via Encyclopedia.com.
- ^ a b c d Harvey 2000, p. 80.
- ^ a b c d e Terwiel 2012, p. 183.
- ^ MacKenzie 2017, p. 10.
- ^ Gombrich 1995, p. 286.
- ^ Keown 2017, p. 28.
- ^ Ariyabuddhiphongs 2009, p. 193.
- ^ Terwiel 2012, p. 188.
- ^ Spiro 1982, p. 449.
- ^ Spiro 1982, pp. 99, 102.
- ^ Jones 1979, p. 374.
- ^ Harvey 2000, pp. 80–81.
- ^ Harvey 2000, p. 82.
- ^ Terwiel 2012, p. 180.
- ^ Harvey 2000, pp. 82–83.
- ^ Spiro 1982, p. 217.
- ^ Queen 2013, p. 532.
- Thomson Gale. 2005. Archivedfrom the original on 29 April 2017 – via Encyclopedia.com.
- ^ Ledgerwood 2008, p. 154.
- ^ a b "Religions - Buddhism: Abortion". BBC. Archived from the original on 24 August 2018.
- ^ a b c Harvey 2000, p. 69.
- ^ Mcdermott 1989, pp. 271–72.
- ^ Harvey 2000, p. 156.
- ^ a b c Harvey 2000, p. 68.
- ^ Wai 2002, p. 293.
- ^ Horigan 1996, p. 275.
- ^ Wai 2002, p. 11.
- ^ Harvey 2000, pp. 313–14.
- ^ Keown 2016a, p. 206.
- ^ Mcdermott 2016, pp. 157–64.
- ^ a b Perrett 2000, p. 101.
- ^ Keown 2016a, p. 209.
- ^ a b Keown 2016a, p. 205.
- ^ a b Agostini 2004, pp. 77–78.
- ^ Harvey 2000, p. 314.
- ^ Keown 1998, p. 400.
- ^ Keown 1998, p. 402.
- ^ Schmithausen 1999, pp. 50–52.
- ^ Schmithausen 1999, pp. 57–59.
- ^ Jones 1979, p. 380.
- ^ Jones 1979, pp. 380, 385 n.2.
- ^ Schmithausen 1999, pp. 56–57.
- ^ Schmithausen 1999, pp. 60–62.
- ^ Terwiel 2012, p. 186.
- ^ Mcdermott 1989, pp. 273–74, 276.
- ^ Swearer 2010, p. 177.
- ^ a b Kieschnick 2005, p. 196.
- ^ a b Gwynne 2017, Ahiṃsa and Samādhi.
- ^ Johansen & Gopalakrishna 2016, p. 341.
- ^ "Religions - Buddhism: War". BBC. Archived from the original on 24 August 2018.
- ^ Alarid & Wang 2001, pp. 239–41, 244 n.1.
- ^ Perrett 2000, pp. 101–03, 109.
- ^ Ratanakul 1998, p. 57.
- ^ Harvey 2000, p. 70.
- ^ a b c Wai 2002, p. 3.
- ^ Ratanakul 2007, p. 253.
- ^ Ariyabuddhiphongs & Hongladarom 2011, pp. 338–39.
- ^ Ariyabuddhiphongs 2007, p. 43.
- ^ Jaiwong & Ariyabuddhiphongs 2010, p. 337.
- ^ a b c d Johansen & Gopalakrishna 2016, p. 342.
- ^ a b c Harvey 2000, pp. 71–72.
- ^ Harvey 2000, p. 73.
- ^ a b c d Leaman 2000, p. 140.
- ^ a b c Harvey 2000, p. 72.
- ^ Derks 1998.
- The Gale Group. 2004. Archivedfrom the original on 24 August 2018 – via Encyclopedia.com.
- ^ Perrett 2000, p. 112.
- ^ a b Gombrich 1995, p. 298.
- ^ a b c Harvey 2000, p. 74.
- ^ Segall 2003, p. 169.
- ^ Harvey 2000, pp. 74, 76.
- ^ a b Harvey 2000, p. 75.
- ^ Wai 2002, p. 295.
- ^ Powers 2013, pañca-śīla.
- ^ Benn 2005, pp. 224, 227.
- ^ Benn 2005, p. 225.
- ^ Benn 2005, pp. 225–26.
- ^ a b Harvey 2000, p. 78.
- ^ Harvey 2000, pp. 78–79.
- ^ Tachibana 1992, p. 62.
- ^ Neumaier 2006, p. 78.
- ^ Terwiel 2012, p. 185.
- ^ Vanphanom et al. 2009, p. 100.
- ^ a b Kaza 2000, p. 24.
- ^ a b Ledgerwood 2008, p. 153.
- Khao Sod(in Thai). Matichon Publishing. 15 October 2013. p. 31.
- Thai Rath (in Thai). Wacharapol. 11 March 2017. Archivedfrom the original on 21 November 2017.
- ^ Bluck 2006, p. 193.
- ^ Baer 2015, pp. 957–59, 965–66.
- ^ a b Yeh 2006, p. 100.
- ^ Keown 2013a, p. 618.
- ^ Keown 2013b, p. 643.
- ^ Edelglass 2013, p. 481.
- ^ Gowans 2017, pp. 57, 61.
- ^ Davis 2017, p. 5.
- ^ Keown 2012, pp. 31–34.
- ^ Seeger 2010, p. 78.
- ^ a b Ledgerwood & Un 2010, p. 540.
- ^ a b c d e Ledgerwood & Un 2010, p. 541.
- ^ Keown 2012, pp. 20–22, 33.
- ^ Seeger 2010, pp. 78–80, 85–86, 88.
References
- Agostini, G. (2004), "Buddhist Sources on Feticide as Distinct from Homicide", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 27 (1): 63–95
- Alarid, Leanne Fiftal; Wang, Hsiao-Ming (2001), "Mercy and Punishment: Buddhism and the Death Penalty", JSTOR 29768067
- Ariyabuddhiphongs, Vanchai (March 2007), "Money Consciousness and the Tendency to Violate the Five Precepts Among Thai Buddhists", International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17 (1): 37–45, S2CID 143789118
- Ariyabuddhiphongs, Vanchai (1 April 2009), "Buddhist Belief in Merit (Punña), Buddhist Religiousness and Life Satisfaction Among Thai Buddhists in Bangkok, Thailand", Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 31 (2): 191–213, S2CID 143972814
- Ariyabuddhiphongs, Vanchai; Hongladarom, Chanchira (1 January 2011), "Violation of Buddhist Five Precepts, Money Consciousness, and the Tendency to Pay Bribes among Organizational Employees in Bangkok, Thailand", Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33 (3): 325–44, S2CID 145596879
- Baer, Ruth (21 June 2015), "Ethics, Values, Virtues, and Character Strengths in Mindfulness-Based Interventions: A Psychological Science Perspective",
- Benn, James A. (2005), "Buddhism, Alcohol, and Tea in Medieval China" (PDF), in Sterckx, R. (ed.), Of Tripod and Palate: Food, Politics, and Religion in Traditional China, ISBN 978-1-4039-7927-8, archived from the original(PDF) on 2018-11-28, retrieved 2018-11-27
- Bluck, Robert (2006), British Buddhism: Teachings, Practice and Development, ISBN 978-0-203-97011-9
- Buswell, Robert E., ed. (2004), "Ethics", Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Macmillan Reference USA, ISBN 978-0-02-865720-2, archivedfrom the original on 24 August 2018 – via Encyclopedia.com
- Cozort, Daniel (2015), "Ethics", in Powers, John (ed.), The Buddhist World, ISBN 978-1-317-42016-3
- Cozort, Daniel; Shields, James Mark (2018), The Oxford Handbook of Buddhist Ethics, ISBN 978-0-19-106317-6
- Davis, J.H. (2017), "Introduction", in Davis, J.H. (ed.), A Mirror is for Reflection: Understanding Buddhist Ethics, Oxford University Press, pp. 1–13
- Derks, Annuska (1998), Trafficking of Vietnamese women and children to Cambodia (PDF), International Organization for Migration, archived (PDF) from the original on 6 August 2016
- De Silva, Padmasiri (2016), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics in Buddhism, ISBN 978-1-349-26772-9
- Edelglass, William (2013), "Buddhist Ethics and Western Moral Philosophy" (PDF), in Emmanuel, Steven M. (ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy (1st ed.), ISBN 978-0-470-65877-2, archived from the original(PDF) on March 16, 2015
- Funayama, Tōru (2004), "The Acceptance of Buddhist Precepts by the Chinese in the Fifth Century", Journal of Asian History, 38 (2): 97–120, JSTOR 41933379
- Getz, Daniel A. (2004), "Precepts", in Buswell, Robert E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Macmillan Reference USA, ISBN 978-0-02-865720-2, archivedfrom the original on 23 December 2017, retrieved 13 July 2018
- ISBN 978-0-7103-0444-5
- Gombrich, Richard F. (2006), Theravāda Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo (PDF) (2nd ed.), ISBN 978-0-203-01603-9, archived from the original(PDF) on 17 November 2017, retrieved 1 August 2018
- Gowans, Christopher W. (2013), "Ethical Thought in Indian Buddhism" (PDF), in Emmanuel, Steven M. (ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, ISBN 978-0-470-65877-2, archived from the original(PDF) on March 16, 2015
- Gowans, Christopher W. (2017), "Buddhist Moral Thought and Western Moral Philosophy", in Davis, J.H. (ed.), A Mirror is for Reflection: Understanding Buddhist Ethics, Oxford University Press, pp. 53–72
- Gwynne, Paul (2017), World Religions in Practice: A Comparative Introduction, ISBN 978-1-118-97227-4
- Harvey, Peter (2000), An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues (PDF), ISBN 978-0-511-07584-1, archived from the original(PDF) on 2019-04-12, retrieved 2018-08-24
- Horigan, D.P. (1996), "Of Compassion and Capital Punishment: A Buddhist Perspective on the Death Penalty", American Journal of Jurisprudence, 41: 271–88,
- Jaiwong, Donnapat; Ariyabuddhiphongs, Vanchai (1 January 2010), "Observance of the Buddhist Five Precepts, Subjective Wealth, and Happiness among Buddhists in Bangkok, Thailand", Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32 (3): 327–44, S2CID 144557806
- Johansen, Barry-Craig P.; Gopalakrishna, D. (21 July 2016), "A Buddhist View of Adult Learning in the Workplace", S2CID 145131162
- Jones, R. H. (1 September 1979), "Theravada Buddhism and Morality",
- Kaza, Stephanie (2000), "Overcoming the Grip of Consumerism", Buddhist-Christian Studies, 20: 23–42, S2CID 1625439
- Kent, Alexandra (2008), "The Recovery of the King" (PDF), in Kent, Alexandra; Chandler, David (eds.), People of Virtue: Reconfiguring Religion, Power and Moral Order in Cambodia Today, ISBN 978-87-7694-036-2, archived(PDF) from the original on 24 August 2018
- S2CID 10435118
- Keown, Damien (2003), A Dictionary of Buddhism, ISBN 978-0-19-157917-2
- Keown, Damien (2005), Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction, ISBN 978-0-19-157794-9
- Keown, Damien (2012), "Are There Human Rights in Buddhism?", in Husted, Wayne R.; Keown, Damien; Prebish, Charles S. (eds.), Buddhism and Human Rights, ISBN 978-1-136-60310-5
- Keown, Damien (2013a), "Buddhism and Biomedical Issues" (PDF), in Emmanuel, Steven M. (ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy (1st ed.), ISBN 978-0-470-65877-2, archived from the original(PDF) on March 16, 2015
- Keown, Damien (2013b), "Buddhist Ethics", in LaFollette, Hugh (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, ISBN 978-1-4051-8641-4
- Keown, Damien (2016a), "Buddhism and Abortion: Is There a 'Middle Way'?", in ISBN 978-1-349-14178-4
- Keown, Damien (2016b), Buddhism and Bioethics, ISBN 978-1-349-23981-8
- Keown, Damien (2017), "It's Ethics, Jim, but Not as We Know It", in Davis, J.H. (ed.), A Mirror is for Reflection: Understanding Buddhist Ethics, Oxford University Press, pp. 17–32
- Kieschnick, John (2005), "Buddhist Vegetarianism in China" (PDF), in Sterckx, R. (ed.), Of Tripod and Palate: Food, Politics, and Religion in Traditional China, ISBN 978-1-4039-7927-8, archived from the original(PDF) on 2018-11-28, retrieved 2018-11-27
- Kohn, Livia (1994), "The Five Precepts of the Venerable Lord",
- Leaman, Oliver (2000), Eastern Philosophy: Key Readings (PDF), ISBN 978-0-415-17357-5, archived(PDF) from the original on 8 August 2017
- Ledgerwood, Judy (2008), "Buddhist practice in rural Kandal province 1960 and 2003", in Kent, Alexandra; Chandler, David (eds.), People of Virtue: Reconfiguring Religion, Power and Moral Order in Cambodia Today, ISBN 978-87-7694-036-2
- Ledgerwood, Judy; Un, Kheang (3 June 2010), "Global Concepts and Local Meaning: Human Rights and Buddhism in Cambodia", Journal of Human Rights, 2 (4): 531–49, S2CID 144667807
- MacKenzie, Matthew (December 2017), "Buddhism and the Virtues", in Snow, Nancy E. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Virtue, vol. 1,
- Mcdermott, J.P. (1 October 1989), "Animals and Humans in Early Buddhism", S2CID 189797935
- Mcdermott, J.P. (2016), "Abortion in the Pali Canon and Early Buddhist Thought", in ISBN 978-1-349-14178-4
- McFarlane, Stewart (1997), "Morals and Society in Buddhism" (PDF), in Carr, Brian; Mahalingam, Indira (eds.), Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, ISBN 978-0-203-01350-2, archived(PDF) from the original on 3 August 2018
- Meadow, Mary Jo (2006), "Buddhism: Theravāda Buddhism", in Riggs, Thomas (ed.), Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices, ISBN 978-0-7876-9390-9
- Neumaier, Eva (2006), "Buddhism: Māhayāna Buddhism", in Riggs, Thomas (ed.), Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices, ISBN 978-0-7876-9390-9
- Osto, Douglas (2015), "Merit", in ISBN 978-1-317-42016-3
- Perrett, Roy W. (July 2000), "Buddhism, Abortion and the Middle Way", S2CID 143808199
- ISBN 978-1-78074-476-6
- Queen, Christopher S. (2013), "Socially Engaged Buddhism: Emerging Patterns of Theory and Practice" (PDF), in Emmanuel, Steven M. (ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, ISBN 978-0-470-65877-2, archived from the original(PDF) on March 16, 2015
- Ratanakul, P. (1998), "Socio-Medical Aspects of Abortion in Thailand", in ISBN 978-1-349-14180-7
- Ratanakul, P. (2007), "The Dynamics of Tradition and Change in Theravada Buddhism", The Journal of Religion and Culture, 1 (1): 233–57, ISSN 1905-8144
- ISBN 978-9004113442
- Seeger, M. (2010), "Theravāda Buddhism and Human Rights. Perspectives from Thai Buddhism" (PDF), in Meinert, Carmen; Zöllner, Hans-Bernd (eds.), Buddhist Approaches to Human Rights: Dissonances and Resonances, Transcript Verlag, pp. 63–92, ISBN 978-3-8376-1263-9
- Segall, Seth Robert (2003), "Psychotherapy Practice as Buddhist Practice" (PDF), in Segall, Seth Robert (ed.), Encountering Buddhism: Western Psychology and Buddhist Teachings, ISBN 978-0-7914-8679-5
- ISBN 978-0-520-04672-6
- Swearer, Donald K. (2010), The Buddhist World of Southeast Asia (PDF) (2nd ed.), ISBN 978-1-4384-3251-9, archived from the original(PDF) on March 16, 2015
- Tachibana, Shundō (1992), The Ethics of Buddhism, ISBN 978-0-7007-0230-5
- ISBN 978-0-226-78950-7
- Tedesco, F.M. (2004), "Teachings on Abortion in Theravāda and Mahāyāna Traditions and Contemporary Korean Practice" (PDF), International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture, 4
- Terwiel, Barend Jan (2012), Monks and Magic: Revisiting a Classic Study of Religious Ceremonies in Thailand (PDF), ISBN 9788776941017, archived(PDF) from the original on 19 August 2018
- Vanphanom, Sychareun; Phengsavanh, Alongkon; Hansana, Visanou; Menorath, Sing; Tomson, Tanja (2009), "Smoking Prevalence, Determinants, Knowledge, Attitudes and Habits among Buddhist Monks in Lao PDR", BMC Research Notes, 2 (100): 100, PMID 19505329
- Wai, Maurice Nyunt (2002), Pañcasila and Catholic Moral Teaching: Moral Principles as Expression of Spiritual Experience in Theravada Buddhism and Christianity, Gregorian Biblical BookShop, ISBN 9788876529207
- Wijayaratna, Mohan (1990), Buddhist monastic life: According to the Texts of the Theravāda Tradition (PDF), ISBN 978-0-521-36428-7, archived from the original(PDF) on 15 December 2017, retrieved 29 July 2018
- Yeh, T.D.L. (2006), "The Way to Peace: A Buddhist Perspective" (PDF), International Journal of Peace Studies, 11 (1): 91–112, (PDF) from the original on 16 November 2009, retrieved 14 August 2018
External links
- Five Precepts: Collected Essays by Paul Dahlke (BPS Wheel Publication No. 55)
- Going for Refuge; Taking the Precepts by Bhikkhu Bodhi (BPS Wheel Publication No. 282 / 284)
- For a Future to Be Possible: classic work about the five precepts, by Thich Nhat Hanhand several other authors
- The Mind of Clover: Essays in Zen Buddhist Ethics: by Zen Buddhism
- Excerpt from the Pāli Canon about the precepts, on website Access to Insight, archivedfrom original on 7 May 2005
- Dissertation about the role of the precepts in modern society, and the aspect of heedfulness (apamada)
- Article with overview of the role of the precepts in Buddhist teachings, by scholar of religion Donald Swearer (registration required)
- The Buddha's Guidelines for Simplifying Life: The Precepts Buddhism for Beginners