HMS Albion (1898)
History | |
---|---|
United Kingdom | |
Name | HMS Albion |
Ordered | 1896 Programme |
Builder | |
Laid down | 3 December 1896 |
Launched | 21 June 1898 |
Completed | June 1901 |
Commissioned | 25 June 1901 |
Decommissioned | August 1919 |
Fate | Sold for scrapping 11 December 1919 |
General characteristics | |
Class and type | pre-dreadnought battleship |
Displacement | ) |
Length | 421 ft 6 in (128.5 m) ( loa ) |
Beam | 74 ft (22.6 m) |
Draught | 26 ft (7.9 m) |
Installed power |
|
Propulsion |
|
Speed | 18 knots (33 km/h) |
Complement | 750 |
Armament |
|
Armour |
|
HMS Albion was a
Albion spent the first few years of her career abroad on the
The ship was transferred to the
Design
Albion and her five
The Canopus-class ships were powered by a pair of 3-cylinder
Albion had a
To save weight, Albion carried less armour than the Majestics—6 inches (152 mm) in the
Service history
HMS Albion was laid down by
Albion's completion then was delayed by late delivery of her machinery. She finally began trials late in 1900, during which she was further delayed by machinery and gun defects, and she was not finally completed until June 1901.
She arrived at
On 26 February 1907, Albion recommissioned at Portsmouth for temporary service with the
World War I
When
Dardanelles campaign
Albion transferred to the Mediterranean in January 1915 to participate in the
Albion participated in another attack on the forts on 25 February; she was tasked with covering a group of minesweepers, along with Triumph and several destroyers after the main bombardment force suppressed the Ottoman batteries. During their operation, Albion came under fire from a 9.4-inch (240 mm) gun from Battery "Orkaniye"; counter fire from Albion, Agamemnon and Irresistible forced the Ottomans to check their fire. By the afternoon, most of the Ottoman artillery had ceased firing, apart from some field guns that could not be observed, and so the minesweepers were ordered to begin clearing the mines, covered by Albion, Triumph, and Vengeance. The following day, Albion, Triumph, and Majestic were assigned to the force that was to break into the Dardanelles and destroy the fortresses at close range. Albion was assigned to the fort at Dardanus, and she opened fire with her main battery at a range of 12,000 yards (11,000 m), though the Ottoman response was light. After the guns fell silent, Albion and Majestic moved on but quickly came under fire from dispersed, mobile field guns, and both vessels were forced to take evasive maneuvers to avoid serious damage. After Majestic was holed below the waterline, Admiral John de Robeck ordered them to break off the attack.[21]
On 28 February, Albion took part in another attempt to suppress the Ottoman defences in the Dardanelles; she and Triumph led the operation, and were tasked with neutralizing the repaired fortress at Dardanus, while Majestic and Ocean supported them by engaging the mobile field guns. As Albion and Triumph approached Dardanus, they came under heavy fire from Ottoman guns on the European side of the straits, including the fortress at Erenköy, and were forced to circle to avoid taking hits. Unable to engage Dardanus under these conditions, the ships instead opened fire on the guns at Erenköy, which initially seemed to be effective, as the Ottoman fire slackened. Ocean and Majestic approached in an attempt to attack Dardanus, but they too came under renewed, furious fire from Erenköy, and de Robeck again ordered a withdrawal. The only success came after the four battleships withdrew from the straits and a landing party from Triumph went ashore and disabled a number of light guns. The inability of the British and French fleets to neutralize the mobile field guns convinced the Allied command that the only way forward would be to make a major amphibious assault to clear the guns by land.[22]
Albion supported another operation in the Dardanelles on 3 March; she, Triumph and Prince George covered a landing force that was to raid Sedd el Bahr. Heavy weather delayed the start of the attack, but the landing took place without incident. Albion shelled Erenköy, which did not return fire, and the landing party discovered a battery of six 15-pounder field guns that they destroyed. Two days later, Albion conducted an indirect fire test to determine the efficacy of attempting to neutralize the fortresses at ranges where the Ottomans would be unable to reply; this was planned to demonstrate the feasibility of using the powerful dreadnought Queen Elizabeth, armed with 15-inch (380 mm) guns, in that role. Albion was tasked with shelling one of the fortresses protecting Çanakkale, and she was covered by several British and French battleships. On entering the straits, Albion came under heavy fire, particularly from Dardanus; three of the covering battleships joined her to suppress those guns, briefly allowing Albion to anchor and begin the planned bombardment. Queen Elizabeth joined the bombardment, but mobile howitzers quickly found both vessels and forced de Robeck to break off the operation.[23]
On 18 March, the Anglo-French fleet mounted a major attack on the Ottoman defences; Albion joined ten British battleships and one battlecruiser and four French battleships for the operation. The plan called for the battleships to enter the narrows and suppress the fortresses while minesweepers cleared paths in the Ottoman minefields. At the same time, transport ships outside the straits would conduct a demonstration to convince the Ottomans they were going to land troops; the Entente commanders hoped this would tie down the Ottoman mobile guns. The British ships initially succeeded in inflicting heavy damage on the fortresses, but the battleship Formidable and then Inflexible began taking serious damage from the coastal batteries. The French battleships also began to take damage, and the battleship Bouvet struck a mine and exploded. Albion and several other battleships attempted to suppress Ottoman guns firing on the boats that went to rescue Bouvet's crew.[24]
She supported the main landings at V Beach at Cape Helles on 25 April 1915. Starting at around 04:30 on the morning of the landings, Albion bombarded the high ground overlooking the beach, but by around 05:30, heavy smoke and mist prevented her gunners from observing targets and so she ceased fire. After the Allied forces began to go ashore, Albion supported their advance on the village of Sedd el Bahr, but by around 07:30 had to check fire again, as friendly troops had entered the town. She then shifted fire to support the men going ashore at W Beach, but heavy Ottoman fire repulsed the landing and the Allied soldiers were forced to withdraw. As it turned out, the report of Allied troops in Sedd el Bahr proved to be erroneous, and further attacks were launched against the Ottoman defenders the following day, which Albion supported. After Albion knocked out a machine gun position on the south-west corner of the village, the troops were able to advance into the town and force the Ottomans to retreat.[25]
On 28 April 1915 she took part in an attack on
Later operations
In late September, after Bulgaria entered the war on the side of the
Notes
- ^ a b Lyon & Roberts, p. 35.
- ^ a b Lyon & Roberts, pp. 34–35.
- ^ Burt, p. 141.
- ^ "The Tragic Launch of HMS Albion". News - National Historic Ships UK. 18 January 2011. Archived from the original on 26 April 2016. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f Burt, p. 159.
- ^ Cohen, Nathalie (19 February 2011). "The Launch of the HMS Albion". Thames Discovery Programme. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
- ^ Burt, pp. 141, 159.
- ^ "Naval & military intelligence". The Times. No. 36491. London. 26 June 1901. p. 11.
- ^ "Naval & military intelligence". The Times. No. 36559. London. 13 September 1901. p. 10.
- ^ "Naval & Military intelligence". The Times. No. 36709. London. 7 March 1902. pp. 3, 8.
- ^ Burt, pp. 97, 159.
- ^ a b c Preston, p. 7.
- ^ Burt, p. 153.
- ^ Corbett 1920, p. 77.
- ^ Corbett 1920, p. 84.
- ^ a b c Burt, pp. 159–160.
- ^ Corbett 1920, pp. 423–424.
- ^ Corbett 1921, p. 235.
- ^ a b c d Burt, p. 160.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 142–149.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 157–168.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 166–169.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 172–173, 189–190.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 213–219.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 330–332, 334–334, 354–455.
- ^ Corbett 1921, pp. 362, 368, 377.
- ^ Corbett 1923, pp. 160–165.
References
- Burt, R. A. (2013) [1988]. British Battleships 1889–1904. Barnsley: Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84832-173-1.
- OCLC 174823980.
- Corbett, Julian Stafford (1921). Naval Operations: From The Battle of the Falklands to the Entry of Italy Into the War in May 1915. Vol. II. London: Longmans, Green & Co. OCLC 924170059.
- Corbett, Julian Stafford (1923). Naval Operations: The Dardanelles Campaign. Vol. III. London: Longmans, Green & Co. OCLC 174824081.
- Lyon, David & Roberts, John (1979). "Great Britain and Empire Forces". In Chesneau, Roger & Kolesnik, Eugene M. (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. Greenwich: Conway Maritime Press. pp. 1–113. ISBN 978-0-85177-133-5.
- Preston, Antony (1985). "Great Britain and Empire Forces". In Gardiner, Robert & Gray, Randal (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. pp. 1–104. ISBN 978-0-87021-907-8.