Hagrold

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Hagrold (

William, Count of Rouen. His career can be interpreted in the context of aiding the Normans against the intrusion of Frankish
authority, or conversely in the context of taking advantage of the Normans.

Context

Following the assassination of

William, Count of Rouen, a man whose son and successor, Richard was merely a child, the Franks took steps to extend their authority into neighbouring Normandy.[1] In 944, according to an account of events preserved by the contemporary Annales of Flodoard and Historiae of Richerus, in the wake of the confusion in Normandy, Louis IV, King of the Franks gave Hugh, Duke of the Franks permission to seize control of the town of Bayeux. Although the duke proceeded to assail the settlement, before he gained control the king reneged on his promise whereupon Hugh left the region.[2]

Attestation

According to the Annales and Historiae, Hagrold captured Louis in 945, after which Hugh eventually secured the king's release through negotiations.[3] The fact that Hagrold is described as in charge of Bayeux in these accounts suggests that he led the successful defence of the town in the preceding year.[4] He was clearly a considerably powerful figure to have not only gained power but withstand Frankish aggression.[5] At this point in history, even before William's assassination, Norman comital power encompassed little more than the outskirts of Rouen.[6] Hagrold—apparently a pagan[7] from Scandinavia[8]—seems to have ruled Bayeaux as his personal domain, and apparently stood independent from both the Franks and Normans.[9] The political disarray in Denmark at about this time would have likely contributed to such settlement in Normandy, and could account from Hagrold's presence there.[10] The successive waves of Scandinavian settlers into Lower Normandy during this period likely contributed to the lack of comital power.[11]

On one hand, it is possible that, following William's death, Hagrold seized control of parts of the

Cotentin with foreign support, and extended his authority to Bayeux.[12] On the other hand, Hagrold may have operated in the context of aiding the Normans of Rouen to oppose the Franks.[13] Although he likely defended Bayeux from Louis and Hugh in 944, Hagrold's capture of Louis the following years suggests that he volunteered to assist Hugh against the king.[14] Religious affiliations played appear to have been factor in the political alignments of tenth-century Normandy. According to the Annales, many pagans from Scandinavia arrived in Normandy in 943, leading some Normans to revert from Christianity to paganism.[15] Long after Hagrold's floruit, Norman secular and ecclesiastical authority in Bayeux remained precarious.[16] Hagrold appears on record as late as 954, when Richard and Hugh are recorded to have attacked Bayeux.[17]

What came of Hagrold is uncertain. One possibility is that he and his family removed to the Irish Sea region, and that his descendants were the Meic Arailt, a family that contested control of this region with the Meic Amlaíb branch of the Uí Ímair.[18] On the other hand, the evidence concerning the Meic Arailt seems to indicate that this family—represented in the second generation by Gofraid mac Arailt and Maccus mac Arailt—was merely a branch of the Uí Ímair itself.[19]

Later interpretations

Whilst the historical accounts of Flodoard are generally reliable, the same cannot be said of the treatment of the tenth century by

Encomium Emmae reginae and Gesta Hammaburgensis ecclesiae pontificum state that he sought assistance from the Slavs.[24]

Citations

  1. ^ McNair (2015) p. 313; Hagger (2013) p. 430.
  2. ^ Herrick (2007) pp. 90, 196 n. 62; Herrick (2005) p. 19, 19 n. 26; Herrick (2003) p. 146; Hoffmann (2000) pp. 128–129 §§ 42–43; Lauer (1905) pp. 90–95.
  3. ^ Lake (2013) pp. 123–127; Herrick (2005) p. 19 n. 26; Herrick (2003) p. 147 n. 65; Hoffmann (2000) pp. 132–133 §§ 47–48; van Houts, E (2000) p. 51; Lauer (1905) pp. 95–100.
  4. ^ Herrick (2005) p. 19 n. 26.
  5. ^ Hudson (2005) p. 66.
  6. ^ Hagger (2012) p. 21; Herrick (2007) p. 90; Herrick (2003) p. 146.
  7. ^ Herrick (2007) p. 91; Hudson (2005) p. 66; Herrick (2003) p. 147.
  8. ^ McNair (2015) p. 325; Hudson (2005) p. 66; Herrick (2003) p. 147.
  9. ^ Herrick (2007) p. 90.
  10. ^ Hudson (2005) pp. 66–67.
  11. ^ Hagger (2012) p. 21.
  12. ^ Crouch (2002) p. 15.
  13. ^ Abrams (2013) p. 60; Dunbabin (2006) p. 385.
  14. ^ Herrick (2007) p. 90; Herrick (2005) p. 19 n. 26; Herrick (2003) p. 147 n. 65.
  15. ^ Herrick (2007) p. 91; Herrick (2003) p. 147; Lauer (1905) pp. 86–90.
  16. ^ Hagger (2012) p. 21; Herrick (2007) p. 91; Herrick (2005) pp. 19–20; Herrick (2003) p. 147.
  17. ^ Hagger (2012) p. 21; Hudson (2005) pp. 65–66; Waitz (1881) p. 89.
  18. ^ McGuigan (2015) p. 107; Abrams (2013) p. 60 n. 89; Beougher (2007) pp. 91–92, 92 n. 150; Downham (2007) p. 186; Woolf (2007) p. 207; Hudson (2005) pp. 67–70, 130 fig. 4.
  19. ^ McGuigan (2015) p. 107; Downham (2007) pp. 186–192, 193 fig. 12.
  20. ^ Hagger (2013) p. 431.
  21. ^ Herrick (2007) p. 92; Hudson (2005) p. 65; vant Houts, EMC (1993); Dolley; Yvon (1971) p. 16; Shetelig (1940) pp. 130–131 n. 16; Lair (1865) p. 240 § 85.
  22. ^ Herrick (2007) p. 92.
  23. ^ vant Houts, EMC (1993); van Houts (1984) p. 117, 117 n. 60; Marx (1914) pp. 41 bk. 3 ch. 9, 53–55 bk. 4 ch. 7, 56–57 bk. 4 ch. 9, 65–66 bk. 4 ch. 16, 225 bk. 3 ch. 9, 226 bk. 4 ch. 7, 227 § bk. 4 ch. 9, 228 bk. 4 ch. 16.
  24. ^ van Houts (1984) p. 117, 117 n. 62.

References

Primary sources

  • Hoffmann, H, ed. (2000). Richer von Saint-Remi Historiae.
    ISSN 0343-2157
    .
  • Lair, J, ed. (1865). De Moribus et Actis Primorum Normanniæ Ducum. Caen: F. Le Blanc-Hardel.
  • Lauer, P, ed. (1905). Les Annales de Flodoard. Paris: Alphonse Picard et Fils.
  • Marx, J, ed. (1914). Gesta Normannorum Ducum. Rouen: A. Lestringant.
  • van Houts, E, ed. (2000). The Normans in Europe. Manchester Medieval Sources Series. Manchester: .
  • .

Secondary sources