Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program

The Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program
Overview of Organization
Type	Research
Field of Work	Health Technology Assessment
Founded	2007[1]
Headquarters	6th Floor, 6th Building, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Rd., Muang, Nonthaburi 11000[2]
Key Personnel	Yot Teerawattananon MD.PhD., Program Leader Sripen Tantivess PhD., Senior Researcher
Research Areas	Health Technology Assessment , Economic Evaluations, Health Policy Analysis, HTA Infrastructure Development
Funding Sources	Domestic Public Funding, International Donor Organizations
v t e

The Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) is a semi-autonomous

HITAP assumes an advisory role to health governmental authorities by providing rigorous scientific evidence through professional assessment of health data in support of public decision-making. These assessments cover a range of topics including system design, selection of technologies for assessment, and the actual assessment of those selected and agreed upon by relevant government agencies.^[4] In this effort, HITAP publishes measures; benefit packages of care – mixing screening and treatments; and other public health policies, e.g. evaluation of Thailand’s government compulsory license policy.

Strategies

In operationalizing HITAP’s goals and in fulfilling its advisory role in the decision making process HITAP follows the five key strategies[5] of having an 1) HTA Fundamental System; 2) strengthening Human Capacity; 3) HTA Research; 4) Knowledge Management; and 5) creating an HTA Network.

Having an HTA fundamental system entails basic

a database of HTA studies in Thailand, tools and quality of life measures for cost-utility analysis, and a social value based threshold ceiling were developed.

HTA in the public health system

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The National Health Security Office, which institutes and manages the largest health plan in Thailand (Universal Coverage Scheme [UC]), initiated a collaborative research and development project with two independent research institutes – the Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program and the International Health Policy Program – in 2009. The aim of the project was to develop an optimal strategy for the development of the UC benefit package, that is, to determine which interventions should be candidate for public reimbursement. The project is named research for development of health benefit package under the universal health care coverage scheme, or known as UCBP (see www.ucbp.net). The project incorporates multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and a deliberative process and multi stakeholders’ involvement to guide national-level priority setting in health care coverage decision. The review documented the experience of seven health technology assessment organizations in Canada, England and Wales, the United States, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden and Spain, which all use an explicit process of priority setting. Its findings concluded that all these organizations consider multiple criteria, involved multiple stakeholders, and distinguish, in one way or another, four basic steps in their priority setting Process. These steps were then also applied in the Thai setting and included. The results of the review were adapted to the Thai setting, resulting in 4 steps of explicit priority setting including: 1) nomination of interventions for assessments, 2) selection of interventions for assessment, 3) technology assessment of interventions, and 4) appraisal of interventions. Since the beginning of the research project up to 119 topics have been proposed for inclusion into the benefit package, with 53 topics selected for further research or HTA analysis.

One of the benefit packages revised through UCBP is the development of a health screening package under the universal health coverage in 2010. Currently, the three public insurance schemes in Thailand offer different health screening packages. The study was designed as a response to requests from stakeholders including decision-makers and representatives from the general public, to develop an evidenced-based health screening package for the population that could ensure equitable access to essential health screening under the three schemes. The results led to advice against elements of current

schemes, to verify and validate the findings and policy recommendations. The package has been endorsed by the Thai UHC Benefit Package Committee for implementation in fiscal year 2016.

drugs. In each of these criteria, the subcommittee’s ^[7]

was to consider scientific evidence to determine which medicines are to be included in the list. Twenty-eight specialist working groups undertake the task of determining what should be on the list as well as informing price negotiations between manufacturers and the NLEM.

Increasingly, awareness and realization that the evidence required for optimal coverage decisions involved analyses in

burden of disease

, the risk to life and financial burden on households posed by the condition and social consideration and commissions the cost-effectiveness research from non-profit agencies (like HITAP).

International work

In late 2013 in response to the increasing requests for involvement in international projects, HITAP created the HITAP International Unit in order to collaborate with international partners and networks working to improve health intervention and technology assessment (HITA) for

Universal Health Care (UHC) and priority-setting capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The HIU has previously worked with the National Center for Pharmaceutical Access and Management (NCPAM), Philippines, Health Technology Assessment Committee (HTAC), Indonesia, Health Systems and Policy Institute (HSPI), Vietnam, the International Decision Support Initiative (IDSI), UK and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

International (NI), UK.

In the past HITAP has been instrumental in pushing HTA forward in international policy by becoming part of the delegation representing Thailand as sponsors and writers of several resolutions in the World Health Assembly (WHA) and the South-East Asia Regional Office (SEARO) of the World Health Organization (WHO), including:

• Health Intervention and Technology Assessment in Support of Universal Health Coverage Agenda. 15.7 A67/VR/9, WHA 67.23 24 May 2014.^[8]
• Health Intervention and Technology Assessment in Support of Universal Health Coverage. SEA/RC66/R4 May, 2014.^[9]

HITAP has also worked to establish regional collaboration amongst HTA units in Asia. Along with the National Evidence-based Health Care Collaborating Agency, South Korea (NECA) and the Center for Drug Evaluation, Taiwan (CDE), HITAP founded the HTAsiaLink Network in 2010.

Asia-Pacific

region. One of its many activities is the production of a biannual HTAsialink Newsletter and an Annual HTAsiaLink Conference held in different member countries in Asia. Currently the Network has 30 member organizations from 16 Countries.

References

1. ^ "HITAP: โครงการประเมินเทคโนโลยีและนโยบายด้านสุขภาพ". HITAP: โครงการประเมินเทคโนโลยีและนโยบายด้านสุขภาพ.
2. ^ "Contact Us". HITAP: โครงการประเมินเทคโนโลยีและนโยบายด้านสุขภาพ.
3. ^ "HITAP: โครงการประเมินเทคโนโลยีและนโยบายด้านสุขภาพ". HITAP: โครงการประเมินเทคโนโลยีและนโยบายด้านสุขภาพ.
4. ISBN 978-616-11-2820-3
   .
5. ISBN 978-616-11-2820-3
   .
6. ^ Tangcharoensathien, V.; Kamolratanakul, P. (2008). "Making sensible rationing: the use of economic evidence and the need for methodological standards". Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Supplement 2. 91: S88–S99.
7. ^ Teerawattananon, Yot; Tritasavit, Nattha; Suchonwanich, N.; Kingkaew, P. (December 2014). "The Use of economic evaluation for guiding the pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand". Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 108 (7): 397–404.
8. ^ "Health Intervention and Technology Assessment in Support of Universal Health Coverage" (PDF). World Health Assembly. 24 May 2014.
9. ^ "Health intervention and technology assessment in support of universal health coverage" (PDF). World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia. 20 July 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 19, 2015.
10. ^ "HTAsiaLink". www.htasialink.org.