Interventionism (politics)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
An illustration of William of Orange of the Dutch Republic landing at Brixham to depose James II of England during the Glorious Revolution in 1688.

Interventionism, in international politics, is the interference of a state or group of states into the domestic affairs of another state for the purposes of

economic interventionism, refers to government interventions into markets at home.[2]

Military intervention, which is a common element of interventionism, has been defined by Martha Finnemore in the context of international relations as "the deployment of military personnel across recognized boundaries for the purpose of determining the political authority structure in the target state". Interventions may be solely focused on altering political authority structures, or may be conducted for humanitarian purposes, or for debt collection.[3]

Interventionism has played a major role in the foreign policies of Western powers, particularly during and after the

Global South, including the Banana Wars. Modern interventionism grew out of Cold War policies, where the United States and the Soviet Union intervened in nations around the world to counter any influence held there by the other nation.[4] Historians have noted that interventionism has always been a contentious political issue in the public opinion of countries which engaged in interventions.[5]

According to a dataset by Alexander Downes, 120 leaders were removed through foreign-imposed regime change between 1816 and 2011.

Palestinian territories.[9] A 2021 review of the existing literature found that foreign interventions since World War II tend to overwhelmingly fail in achieving their purported objectives.[10]

Foreign-imposed regime change

Studies by Alexander Downes, Lindsey O'Rourke, and Jonathan Monten indicate that foreign-imposed regime change seldom reduces the likelihood of civil war, violent removal of the newly imposed leader,[6] and the probability of conflict between the intervening state and its adversaries,[11] and does not increase the likelihood of democratization unless regime change comes with pro-democratic institutional changes in countries with favorable conditions for democracy.[12] Downes argues:[6]

The strategic impulse to forcibly oust antagonistic or non-compliant regimes overlooks two key facts. First, the act of overthrowing a foreign government sometimes causes its military to disintegrate, sending thousands of armed men into the countryside where they often wage an insurgency against the intervener. Second, externally-imposed leaders face a domestic audience in addition to an external one, and the two typically want different things. These divergent preferences place imposed leaders in a quandary: taking actions that please one invariably alienates the other. Regime change thus drives a wedge between external patrons and their domestic protégés or between protégés and their people.

Research by Nigel Lo, Barry Hashimoto, and Dan Reiter has contrasting findings, as they find that interstate "peace following wars last longer when the war ends in foreign-imposed regime change".[13] However, research by Reiter and Goran Peic finds that foreign-imposed regime change can raise the probability of civil war.[14]

By country

China

The
People's Republic of China has intervened in foreign countries on numerous occasions. Traditionally, official stances by China included a non-intervention approach, though as it became an emerging power, it has utilized intervention tactics.[15]

Cuba

The small island nation of Cuba had impacts throughout the world

Cuba intervened into numerous conflicts during the Cold War. The country sent medical and military aid into foreign countries to aid Socialist governments and rebel groups. These interventionist policies were controversial and resulted in isolation from many countries.[16] Due to the ongoing Cold War, Cuba attempted make allies across Latin America and Africa. Cuba believed it had more freedom to intervene in Africa as the U.S. was more concerned about Latin America.[17] Still, the US was strongly opposed to Cuban involvement in Africa and continued Cuban intervention was a major source of tension.[18] Cuban intervention was often confidential and all Cuban doctors and soldiers were forced to keep their location confidential.[19]

In Latin America, Cuba supported numerous rebel movements, including in

People's Revolutionary Government during the United States invasion of Grenada. While most Cuban military interventions were Soviet-backed, Cuba often worked independently and at times even supported opposing sides.[18] General Leopoldo Cintra Frías, who served in both Angola and Ethiopia, stated, "The Soviets were never able to control us although I think that was their intention on more than one occasion."[20]

Cuban foreign policy was motivated by both idealism and realpolitik.[17] It publicly justified its interventions into foreign conflicts for a number of reasons; to spread their revolutionary ideas, aid "liberation movements" fighting for independence,[17] and to protect the territorial sovereignty of allied nations. Cuban leader Fidel Castro stated: "Our Revolution is not a revolution of millionaires. Instead, it is one carried out by the poor, and is one which dreams of ensuring the well-being not only of our own poor, but rather of all the poor in this world. And that is why we talk of internationalism."[21] Cuba was the only economically lesser developed nation with extensive military intervention in Africa.[18] Cuba was a strong supporter of the Organization for African Unity's emphasis on border protection and African independence.[18]

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and facing the economic difficulties during the Special Period, Cuba continued to maintain a presence in Africa, including the service of many doctors.[18] Cuban medical internationalism was a prominent feature of their interventions alongside military aspects. Medical internationalism consisted of four prevailing approaches: emergency response medical teams sent overseas; establishment abroad of public health systems for providing free health care for local residents; taking in foreign patients to Cuba for free treatment; and providing medical training for foreigners, to Cuba and overseas.[22] All Cuban doctors overseas were volunteers.[19]

Ethiopia

Ethiopia has intervened

in Somalia
.

India

India has intervened

in Sri Lanka
.

Indonesia

Indonesia has intervened in East Timor.

Iran

Iran has intervened in Iraq and in Syria.

Israel

Nigeria

Nigeria has shown the will to intervene in the affairs of other sub Saharan African countries since independence. It is said that one of the reasons Yakubu Gowon was removed from office had been the squandering of Nigeria's resources in such far-away lands as Grenada and Guyana, with no returns, economic or political for Nigeria. The philosophy of subsequent military governments in Nigeria was that in an increasingly interdependent world, a country cannot be an island.[23]

Russia

FSB and formerly a part of the 16th KGB department.[25]

An analysis by the
Defense Intelligence Agency in 2017 outlines Russia's view of "Information Countermeasures" or IPb (informatsionnoye protivoborstvo) as "strategically decisive and critically important to control its domestic populace and influence adversary states", dividing 'Information Countermeasures' into two categories of "Informational-Technical" and "Informational-Psychological" groups. The former encompasses network operations relating to defense, attack, and exploitation and the latter to "attempts to change people's behavior or beliefs in favor of Russian governmental objectives."[26]

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia has led interventions in Bahrain and in Yemen.

Soviet Union

Eastern Bloc
Over the course of its history, the Soviet Union intervened in foreign countries on numerous occasions.

Turkey

Turkey has intervened

in Cyprus, in Libya and in Syria
.

United Arab Emirates

The UAE has intervened in Sudan and in Yemen.

United States


The

territorial expansion, fomenting regime change, nation-building, and enforcing international law.[27]

There have been two dominant ideologies in the United States about foreign policy—interventionism, which encourages military and political intervention in the affairs of foreign countries—and isolationism, which discourages these.[28]

The 19th century formed the roots of United States foreign interventionism, which at the time was largely driven by economic opportunities in the Pacific and Spanish-held Latin America along with the Monroe Doctrine, which saw the U.S. seek a policy to resist European colonialism in the Western Hemisphere. The 20th century saw the U.S. intervene in two world wars in which American forces fought alongside their allies in international campaigns against Imperial Japan, Imperial and Nazi Germany, and their respective allies. The aftermath of World War II resulted in a foreign policy of containment aimed at preventing the spread of world communism. The ensuing Cold War resulted in the Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Carter, and Reagan Doctrines, all of which saw the U.S. engage in espionage, regime change, proxy wars, and other clandestine activity internationally against affiliates and puppet regimes of the Soviet Union.

After the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the U.S. emerged as the world's sole superpower and, with this, maintained interventionist policies in Africa, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East. Following the September 11 attacks in 2001, the Bush Administration launched the "war on terror" in which the U.S. waged international counterterrorism campaigns against various extremist groups—such as al-Qaeda and the Islamic State—in various countries. The Bush Doctrine of preemptive war saw the U.S. invade Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003. In addition, the U.S. expanded its military presence in Africa and Asia via status of forces agreements and a revamped policy of foreign internal defense. The Obama administration's 2012 "Pivot to East Asia" strategy sought to refocus U.S. geopolitical efforts from counter-insurgencies in the Middle East to improving American diplomatic influence and military presence in East Asia. The "Pivot to Asia" fomented a policy shift towards countering China's rising influence and perceived expansionism in the South China Sea—a trajectory continued by the Trump (2017–2021) and Biden administrations under the Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) strategy.

The United States Navy has been involved in anti-piracy activity in international and foreign territory throughout its history, from the Barbary Wars to combating modern piracy off the coast of Somalia and other regions.

See also

References

  1. ISSN 0002-7162
    .
  2. ^ "Interventionism". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
  3. .
  4. .
  5. .
  6. ^ .
  7. .
  8. ^ Agrawal, Nina (21 December 2016). "The U.S. is no stranger to interfering in the elections of other countries". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
  9. ISSN 1528-3577
    .
  10. .
  11. .
  12. .
  13. .
  14. .
  15. .
  16. .
  17. ^ a b c "Cosmopod: Cuba in Africa with Piero Gleijeses on Apple Podcasts". Apple Podcasts. Retrieved 2023-05-08.
  18. ^
    ISSN 2448-3923
    .
  19. ^ .
  20. ^ a b Scheina (2003). Latin America's Wars Volume II: The Age of the Professional Soldier, 1900-2001. pp. 1003–1035.
  21. .
  22. ^ Yaffe, Helen (2020). "Chapter 6: Cuban Medical Internationalism". We Are Cuba!. Yale University Press. pp. 152–154.
  23. ^ "Interventionism". LitCaf. 2021-12-10. Retrieved 2022-10-12.
  24. Wall Street Journal. Archived
    from the original on 8 January 2021. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  25. ^ State control over the internet Archived 22 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine, a talk show by Yevgenia Albats at the Echo of Moscow, 22 January 2006; interview with Andrei Soldatov and others
  26. ^ "Military Power Publications". www.dia.mil. Archived from the original on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
  27. ^
    S2CID 251479665
    .
  28. ^ Wertheim, "Tomorrow The World," 2020, p4.

Further reading

  • Kupchan, Charles A. Isolationism: A History of America's Efforts to Shield Itself from the World (Oxford University Press, 2020).
  • Lee, Melissa M. 2020. Crippling Leviathan: How Foreign Subversion Weakens the State. Princeton University Press.