Operation Catechism

Coordinates: 69°38′49″N 18°48′26″E / 69.64694°N 18.80722°E / 69.64694; 18.80722
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Operation Catechism
Part of World War II
Painting showing an overturned ship
The Tirpitz's wreck painted by Stephen Bone
Date12 November 1944
Near Tromsø, Norway
69°38′49″N 18°48′26″E / 69.64694°N 18.80722°E / 69.64694; 18.80722
Result British victory
 United Kingdom  Germany
Commanders and leaders
United Kingdom James Tait Nazi Germany Robert Weber 
29 bombers Battleship Tirpitz
2 flak ships
Anti-aircraft batteries
Casualties and losses
1 aircraft damaged 940–1,204 killed
Tirpitz destroyed

Operation Catechism was a British air raid of

after being hit by at least two bombs and damaged by the explosions of others, killing between 940 and 1,204 members of the crew; the British suffered no casualties.

The attack ended a long-running series of air and naval operations against Tirpitz that sought to eliminate the threat she posed to Allied shipping. The battleship had been moved to the Tromsø area in October 1944 after being crippled on 15 September during Operation Paravane. This attack had been carried out by the RAF's elite Nos. 9 and 617 Squadrons, who unsuccessfully attempted to strike Tirpitz again at Tromsø on 29 October during Operation Obviate.

Operation Catechism re-used the plans for Operation Obviate, and was conducted by the same squadrons. The aircraft departed from bases in northern Scotland and, due to clear weather conditions, the Commonwealth airmen were able to accurately target and bomb the battleship. The bombers were unmolested by a unit of German fighter aircraft that failed to take off from nearby Tromsø in time. One bomber was significantly damaged by anti-aircraft artillery.

Tirpitz capsized within minutes of being hit. Rescuers picked up hundreds of her crew from the water, but few of those trapped within the hull were saved. Several German military personnel were convicted of dereliction of duty following the attack. The battleship's destruction was celebrated in Allied countries and Norway, and is commemorated by several memorials and displays in museums.


From early 1942, Tirpitz posed a significant threat to the Allied convoys transporting supplies through the Norwegian Sea to the Soviet Union. Stationed in fjords on the Norwegian coast, the battleship was capable of overwhelming the close-escort forces assigned to the Arctic convoys or breaking out into the North Atlantic.[1] To counter this threat, the Allies needed to keep a powerful force of warships with the British Home Fleet, and capital ships accompanied most convoys part of the way to the Soviet Union.[2][3]

Northern Norway and nearby areas of Sweden, Finland and the Soviet Union

Tirpitz was repeatedly attacked by British forces over several years. Royal Air Force (RAF) heavy bombers made four unsuccessful raids on the battleship between January and April 1942 while she was stationed at Fættenfjord.[4] From March 1943, Tirpitz was based at Kaafjord in the far north of Norway. During Operation Source on 22 September, she was severely damaged by explosives placed on her hull by Royal Navy personnel who had used midget submarines to penetrate Kaafjord.[4][5] On 3 April 1944, aircraft flying from Royal Navy aircraft carriers attacked Tirpitz during Operation Tungsten and inflicted further damage.[6] A series of subsequent aircraft carrier attacks were unsuccessful, including Operation Mascot on 17 July and Operation Goodwood which was conducted between 22 and 29 August 1944.[7][8]

After the failure of Operation Goodwood, it was decided that further carrier attacks against Tirpitz would be fruitless due to the inadequacies of the Royal Navy's aircraft and their armament. Accordingly, responsibility for sinking Tirpitz was transferred to the RAF's

bow and rendered her unfit for combat.[8]

As Tirpitz could not be repaired and Soviet forces were advancing towards Kaafjord,

Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz, the commander of the Kriegsmarine (the German Navy), ordered that she be transferred to near the northern Norwegian city of Tromsø and used as an immobile battery to defend the area from attack. Dönitz hoped that this would also convince the Allies that Tirpitz continued to pose a threat.[12][13] An anchorage was selected just off the coast of the island of Håkøya where it was believed the water was shallow enough to prevent the battleship from sinking if another attack was successful.[14][15] Tirpitz arrived there on 16 October.[16] The depth of water at the mooring was found to be greater than anticipated, leaving the battleship vulnerable to capsizing. Because of the space needed by Tirpitz's torpedo nets, it was not possible to move her closer to shore.[17]

RAF and Royal Navy reconnaissance aircraft located Tirpitz at Tromsø on 18 October.[15] As the Allied intelligence services had not been able to confirm that the battleship had been crippled, it was considered necessary to conduct further air raids against her.[18] Nos. 9 and 617 Squadrons attacked Tirpitz on 29 October in what was designated Operation Obviate. As the Tromsø area was within range of RAF bases in northern Scotland if the Lancasters were modified, this attack was somewhat simpler to conduct than Operation Paravane. To extend their range, the Lancasters were fitted with extra fuel tanks and more powerful engines, and their forward and mid-upper gun turrets and pilot's armour plate were removed.[19] The reduction in armament left the Lancasters very vulnerable to German fighter aircraft, and they would have to fly without escort as no British fighters had the range needed to reach Tromsø.[20]

During Operation Obviate, the bombers flew north over the Norwegian Sea, and met up over Torneträsk lake in Northern Sweden.[21] This violated Sweden's neutrality, but allowed the bombers to approach Tromsø from the south-east. The Allies believed the Germans would not expect an attack from this direction.[22] Despite clear weather for most of the flight, Tirpitz was covered by cloud shortly before the Lancasters reached the point where they were to release their Tallboy bombs. This made it impossible to accurately target the battleship, and the 33 aircraft which bombed achieved no hits. Tirpitz was slightly damaged by a near miss. One of the Lancasters made a forced landing in Sweden after being damaged by anti-aircraft gunfire, and the remainder returned to base.[23][24]



Bomber Command remained determined to sink Tirpitz as soon as possible, and preparations for another attack began shortly after Operation Obviate.[25][26] A report issued by the Royal Navy's Naval Intelligence Division on 3 November judged that it remained necessary to attack Tirpitz in northern Norway. The report argued that the battleship could potentially be repaired and made fully operational if she was left unmolested and able to reach a major port. As it would be difficult to target the battleship during the period of near perpetual darkness in the northern winter, further attacks needed to be made within the 23 days before this commenced.[27] No. 5 Group RAF directed on 3 November that the next attack on Tirpitz was to take place on 5 November, and would re-use the plans developed for Operation Obviate. The raid was designated Operation Catechism.[27]

Two de Havilland Mosquito meteorological aircraft were stationed at RAF Sumburgh from 4 November, from where they conducted daily sorties to monitor weather conditions in the Tromsø area.[27][28] On the same day, twenty No. 9 Squadron and nineteen No. 617 Squadron Lancasters were dispatched to airfields in northern Scotland in preparation for the operation. A gale warning was issued that night and the raid was cancelled as a result on the morning of 5 November. Both squadrons returned to their home bases during the day.[27] The two squadrons deployed again to Scotland on 7 November, but soon returned to their home bases when the attack was cancelled.[29]

On 10 November, the Lancaster crews were briefed for another attack on Tirpitz. Both squadrons moved to northern Scotland on 11 November when meteorological reports indicated that there would be clear weather over Tromsø for up to two days.[29][30] The aircraft were split between RAF Kinloss, RAF Lossiemouth and RAF Milltown.[29]


Black and white aerial photograph showing a body of water with a large warship near the shore
Tirpitz at her mooring off the island of Håkøya in northern Norway in November 1944

Tirpitz's defences were improved after Operation Obviate. Additional anti-aircraft guns were emplaced in the Tromsø area and torpedo nets were laid around the battleship.[30] These augmented the protection offered by the anti-aircraft ships Nymphe and Thetis and several anti-aircraft batteries on the shore.[31] Dredging operations to reduce the water level below the battleship's hull began on 1 November. By 12 November these were half complete.[27] The smoke generators that had previously protected Tirpitz at Kaafjord were still being installed at the time of Operation Catechism and were not yet operational. In their place, seven fishing boats fitted with smoke generators were positioned near the battleship; these were not capable of generating a smokescreen that could completely cover Tirpitz.[32]

The battleship's crew continued regular training exercises, and remained concerned about further air attacks.[33] On 4 November Tirpitz's commanding officer Captain Wolf Junge departed. He was replaced by the executive officer, Captain Robert Weber.[34] Weber believed that within three weeks the days would be short enough to prevent further air attacks.[30] On 12 November around 1,700 men were on board Tirpitz.[35]

A force of 38 fighters was transferred to

advanced towards the town, and was disorganised at the time of Operation Catechism.[37] Most of the pilots at Bardufoss were inexperienced and ill-trained, and the unit had not been properly briefed on Tirpitz's presence in the area. Ehrler arrived at Bardufoss on 9 November en route to Alta, and decided to remain there until the morning of 12 November to oversee an emergency training programme for the fighter pilots.[32]



The decision to launch Operation Catechism was made in the early hours of 12 November. A weather forecast issued on the afternoon of 11 November predicted that clouds might be encountered over northern Norway. One of the Mosquito meteorological aircraft flew over the area that evening, and its crew reported encountering patches of cloud when they returned to Scotland shortly after midnight on the night of 11–12 November.[29] Nevertheless, the commander of No. 5 Group, Air Commodore Ralph Cochrane, decided to attempt another attack in the hope that the bombers would encounter clear weather over Tromsø. The plan for this operation remained the same as that used in Operation Obviate, with the attack force to use identical routes.[38]

A total of 32 Lancasters were dispatched. No. 617 Squadron contributed eighteen bombers, and No. 9 Squadron thirteen. As with Operations Paravane and Obviate, they were joined by a Lancaster fitted out as a film aircraft from No. 463 Squadron RAAF.[39] The role of this aircraft was to collect material for use in propaganda films.[40] Seven No. 9 Squadron Lancasters, including that of its commanding officer Wing Commander James Bazin, were unable to participate, as they could not be cleared in time of the snow and ice that had formed on them overnight.[38][41] The No. 617 Squadron aircraft took off between 2:59 and 3:25 am BST, and the No. 9 Squadron aircraft between 3:00 and 3:35 am BST.[42] The aircraft flown by No. 9 Squadron's deputy commander, Squadron Leader Bill Williams, was among those able to take off and he assumed command of the unit.[43][44]

The Lancasters flew individually over the Norwegian Sea. As had been the case during Operation Obviate, they crossed the Norwegian coast between the towns of Mosjøen and Namsos where a gap in German radar coverage had been located. Several of the bombers flew too far to the north, and came within range of German radar stations.[45] The attack force rendezvoused over Torneträsk lake.[38][43] After making two orbits, No. 617 Squadron's commanding officer, Wing Commander "Willie" Tait, fired a flare gun from his aircraft to signal the force to proceed to Tromsø.[42] Two No. 9 Squadron Lancasters failed to reach Torneträsk lake in time, and returned to base without attacking.[38][39]


The attack force proceeded north-west towards Tromsø, and climbed to 14,000 feet (4,300 m) to clear the mountains along the border of Sweden and Norway. They were guided by radio homing signals transmitted by a Norwegian Milorg agent stationed near the border between the two countries.[46] By the time they reached the Tromsø area, both of the squadrons had formed up into loose formations.[47] No. 617 Squadron led the attack, followed by No. 9 Squadron. The Lancasters were grouped into "gaggles" of four to six aircraft that flew at altitudes of between 14,000 feet (4,300 m) and 15,000 feet (4,600 m).[39] The No. 463 Squadron film aircraft approached Tromsø at 6,000 feet (1,800 m), and dropped to 2,000 feet (610 m) to evade anti-aircraft fire at the start of the attack.[48]

The German forces in the Tromsø area failed to adequately respond to multiple warnings of the approaching British bombers. Between 7:39 am and 8:50 am BST several observation posts in the area reported sighting Lancasters. As the first aircraft to be spotted were flying east, it was thought that they might be headed to the Soviet Union. Tirpitz was not notified of the reports until 8:15 am BST and few reports were passed on to the JG 5 detachment at Bardufoss. Tirpitz's air raid siren was sounded at 8:51 am, and Weber informed the ship's crew seven minutes later that an attack was possible.[49]

At around 9:15 am BST, Tirpitz contacted Bardufoss to request that fighters be dispatched to provide air cover. This was too late for any of the fighters to reach Tromsø before the bombers arrived.[50] The local Luftwaffe command ordered the fighters to be scrambled at 9:18 am. Due to various delays, the aircraft did not begin taking off from Bardufoss until approximately 9:32 am. Ehrler took off first, but the others were delayed from doing so for several minutes while an aircraft landed on the runway. Ehrler proceeded to the Tromsø area by himself, but was unable to locate the British bombers before they attacked. It is not clear where the other fighters were sent. One post-attack report stated they were sent to the border with Sweden, another that they proceeded to Kaafjord and two pilots claimed to have reached Tromsø after Tirpitz was destroyed.[51]

Weather conditions over Tromsø continued to be clear when the attack force arrived in the area. Tait spotted Tirpitz from 20 miles (32 km) away, and later recalled that she was "lying squat and black among her torpedo nets like a spider in her web, silhouetted against the glittering blue and green waters of the fjord".[38]

Destruction of Tirpitz

Tirpitz fired the first shots of the battle at 9:38 am BST when she opened fire on the bombers with her 15-inch (380 mm) calibre main guns from a range of 13.5 miles (22 km), firing timed-fuze fragmentation shells designed for barrage antiaircraft fire. Other anti-aircraft guns also fired on the Lancasters as they approached, but did not disrupt them. No smokescreen was present as they flew north-west towards their bombing positions.[47][52]

A film showing Tirpitz under attack during Operations Paravane and Catechism

The attack commenced at 9:41 am BST. Tait's aircraft was the first to drop its Tallboy, which hit Tirpitz. No. 617 Squadron completed its attack at 9:44 am BST with all aircraft bombing. No. 9 Squadron aircraft began dropping their Tallboys at 9:45 am BST. By this time the battleship was on fire and covered in smoke. The last bomb was released at 9:49 am BST.[53][54][55]

Tirpitz was rapidly destroyed. She was struck by two Tallboys that penetrated her armoured deck. One hit to the port of "Bruno" turret in the forward section of the ship but did not explode.

amidships near the tracks for the aircraft catapult, and exploded over the port boiler room. This explosion caused severe damage that resulted in extensive flooding, fires throughout the ship and a list of 15 to 20 degrees to port.[52][56][57] Several other bombs detonated in the water near Tirpitz, which caused further damage to her hull and additional flooding. These explosions also created large craters below the ship, and blew away much of the gravel that had been dumped beneath her.[58][59] Another Tallboy probably hit Tirpitz. The historian John Sweetman states that this bomb ricocheted off the side of the ship. William H. Garzke and Robert O. Dulin have written that it is likely to have penetrated the armoured deck near "Caesar" turret in the stern of the ship and started a fire near a powder or shell magazine.[56][60] Almost all the hits and near misses were on the port side of Tirpitz, which destabilised her and led the list to rapidly increase.[61] Many sailors manning Tirpitz's anti-aircraft guns were killed or wounded by the bombs, resulting in a significant reduction in the volume of fire directed at the Lancasters.[52]

After the first bomb struck his ship, Weber ordered the crew to evacuate the

armoured citadel and attempt to counter the flooding. Despite the list, Weber expected that Tirpitz would not sink as the water beneath her hull was too shallow.[58] Counter flooding proved impossible as the controls for the necessary systems had been abandoned, and the volume of water that was entering the ship was well beyond their ability to fight had they been operational. Weber ordered that the lower decks be evacuated at 9:45 am, by which time the list had reached between 30 and 40 degrees.[62] At 9:50 am the magazine for "Caesar" turret exploded, causing extensive damage. Tirpitz's list rapidly increased, and she was soon lying on her side. Weber then gave the order to abandon ship.[58] The battleship continued to heel over, and capsized at 9:52 am.[52] Almost 1,000 of her crew had either been killed by this time, or were trapped inside the hull.[58]

The crews of several Lancasters observed Tirpitz capsize.

Secret Intelligence Service agent Egil Lindberg also sent radio reports from Tromsø confirming that Tirpitz had been destroyed.[66]


Rescue efforts

Black and white aerial photograph showing an overturned ship
The capsized Tirpitz in March 1945

The German forces in the Tromsø area endeavoured to rescue the surviving members of Tirpitz's crew. Within two hours, 596 had swum to shore or been rescued from the water.

Acetylene torches were needed to cut into the thick hull, and none were initially available. Local Norwegian civilians who owned torches hid them, and only one could be found.[71] A total of 87 men were rescued from within the hull in the 24 hours after the attack.[68] Cutting continued for two further days, and was finally abandoned when it was assessed that the oxygen supply inside the wreck would have been exhausted; no survivors were recovered during this period.[68][71] Estimates of the total number of sailors and officers killed vary, with the most common figures lying between 940 and 1,204.[71] Weber and all of his senior officers were among the dead.[68][72]

Many Norwegian civilians in Tromsø were pleased that Tirpitz had been destroyed, not least as it meant the end of an order requiring that they billet members of her crew. Several civilians who showed pleasure at the event in public were arrested by the Gestapo.[73] Other Norwegians were saddened by the way that the battleship's crew had died.[74]

Work began on stripping Tirpitz's wreck soon after rescue efforts ended, and continued until the late 1950s. Before the end of the war, German personnel removed the ship's bronze propellers and some other components so they could be melted down.[75] The wreck was sold to a Norwegian scrap dealing company in 1948, and was broken up in situ. Salvage work concluded in 1957, by which time most remnants of the battleship had been removed. The human remains which were recovered from the wreck by scrappers were initially buried alongside unwanted parts of Tirpitz, but this ceased following complaints by a local church minister. The remains of hundreds of others were recovered and buried in Norwegian cemeteries.[76]

Return to base

One of the No. 9 Squadron Lancasters was badly damaged by anti-aircraft gunfire, and its pilot decided to attempt a crash-landing in Sweden. The crew were able to make radio contact with Swedish military forces manning a small airfield at Naisjärv, who prepared it for the bomber. When one of the Lancaster's engines cut out while attempting to land, the pilot made a belly landing in a field near a village. None of the crew were injured, and all were interned by the Swedish Government.[77] They were subsequently repatriated to the UK.[66]

Black and white photo of six men standing behind an aircraft
A No. 617 Squadron crew shortly after returning from Operation Catechism

The other Lancasters' return flights were complicated by adverse winds. Due to shortages of fuel, many had to divert to alternative airfields but all landed safely during the afternoon of 12 November.[73] Two Lancasters landed at RAF Banff, one of which still carried its Tallboy which had hung up. After taxiing to a halt, and moments after the crew left the aircraft, the Tallboy released itself and clattered to the concrete.[78] The film aircraft flew directly to its home station, RAF Waddington, where its pilot was debriefed by Air Commodore Cochrane.[79] The bomber squadrons returned to their home bases over the next two days.[65]

In the days after the attack, the airmen received congratulations from King

Nazi regime, and her destruction provided further evidence that the war was coming to an end. Tait was privately sceptical of the value of the operation though, and later noted in his private papers that it "had not contributed much to the Allied victory" as the crippled battleship had not posed a threat.[83]

Many of the aircrew involved in Operation Catechism were decorated in recognition of their part in the attack.

Sir Arthur Harris, the head of Bomber Command, the medal was not awarded.[85] Instead, Tait was awarded a third bar to his Distinguished Service Order (DSO). The citation recognised his "conspicuous bravery and extreme devotion to duty in the face of the enemy, constantly exemplified over a long period of operational flying" and role in leading three attacks on Tirpitz.[86] Two other pilots received the DSO and six airmen were awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross.[84]

Tirpitz's destruction freed up Allied resources for other theatres. More than half the Home Fleet was deployed elsewhere, including many ships sent to the Pacific to fight Japanese forces.[87]



The loss of Tirpitz was a disaster for the German military units in northern Norway.

court martialled and imprisoned.[89] Ehrler was convicted in relation to leaving his unit's operations room under the command of a non-commissioned officer on 12 November. He was sentenced to three years' imprisonment, but was released after a month and demoted. He was killed in combat on 4 April 1945.[90] Many commentators and members of JG 5 believe that Ehrler was treated as a scapegoat.[91] Dönitz also ordered that an inquiry be held into why the battleship capsized. The inquiry concluded that "the actual depth of the prepared berth did not conform with the requirements and directions of the commander-in-chief".[92]

It is unclear why the fighters at Bardufoss failed to protect the battleship. Much of the relevant documentation did not survive the war, and accounts from survivors are at times contradictory.[93] Sweetman judged that the failure ultimately resulted from the order to intercept the bombers being issued too late, and a lack of clear plans to coordinate the defence.[94] He attributed the former to delays in recognising that the bombers were headed for Tirpitz, as well as inefficient chains of communication that slowed the speed with which this information could be acted on. For instance, it was not possible for German naval personnel to pass information directly to their Luftwaffe equivalents, as messages had to be sent through single-service channels and could only be transmitted between services at relatively senior levels.[89] The historian Daniel Knowles reached a similar conclusion, labelling Tirpitz's defences "chaotic" due to the poor communications between the battleship and Bardufoss.[95]


Black and white photo of two men wearing military uniforms standing on the overturned hull of a ship
RAF Wing Commander Willie Tait (at left) and an Australian officer standing on the wreck of Tirpitz in late 1945

The British military undertook several analyses of the attack. In December 1944, No. 5 Group's headquarters investigated the accuracy of the bombing. This analysis found that No. 617 Squadron had been much more accurate than No. 9 Squadron, possibly due to the latter squadron's bombardiers inputting an inaccurate wind speed into their

Stabilized Automatic Bomb Sight fitted to No. 617 Squadron's aircraft may have also contributed to the difference.[96]

On 21–22 May 1945, after the end of the war in Europe, an RAF team travelled to Norway to investigate the causes of Tirpitz's sinking. During the trip they inspected the wreck of the battleship and interviewed key German officers. In their report, the team noted that the damage inflicted on Tirpitz during Operations Source and Paravane had never been fully repaired. The team concluded that the battleship had been directly hit by two Tallboys.[97] A team from the Royal Navy's Directorate of Naval Construction also inspected the wreck between 4 September and 14 October 1945, and interviewed witnesses to the attack. This team judged that a lack of watertight integrity resulting from flaws in Tirpitz's design, as well as the watertight doors that divided compartments being left open as the crew evacuated, led the battleship to rapidly capsize.[98] Sweetman noted that "there was, thus, no single cause of Tirpitz's ultimate loss", as it resulted from the combination of two direct hits, the damage caused by five near misses and problems with the battleship's design.[99]


Black and white photograph of a capsized ship
The wreck of Tirpitz after the war

Historians hold differing views over whether the final attacks on Tirpitz were necessary. Angus Konstam has written that the battleship posed no threat to Allied shipping from April 1944 due to the damage inflicted in Operations Source and Tungsten. He argued that the subsequent attacks were motivated by Churchill and other members of the War Cabinet having an "obsession" with destroying Tirpitz, and that Operations Obviate and Catechism were mainly undertaken for propaganda purposes.[100] Patrick Bishop has observed that "the zeal of the pursuit, whipped on by Churchill, seems excessive now, but wartime created its own dynamic", and that Operation Catechism contributed little towards ending the war.[83] Similarly, Niklas Zetterling and Michael Tamelander have judged that although "the British were not fully aware that the Germans had written off Tirpitz as an offensive weapon in autumn 1944, their final efforts appear almost overzealous".[101] The official history of British intelligence in World War II states that Dönitz's use of the battleship to tie down Allied resources was successful, and "in her last days she briefly excelled" in this role.[102]

Other historians believe that the attacks were justified. Sweetman has written that while the Allied intelligence services erred in believing that Tirpitz could be repaired and returned to service following Operation Paravane, the British leadership acted correctly on the information available to them by ordering further attacks.[103] John Ellis reached a similar conclusion, and also argued that Operations Obviate and Catechism were justified as they contributed to sustaining the Fortitude North deception campaign that had led the Germans to maintain powerful ground forces in Norway in the mistaken belief that the Allies were planning amphibious landings there.[104] The retired United States Navy Rear Admiral William H. Langenberg judged that "because of her strategic importance, all the Allied attempts to disable or sink Tirpitz were justified".[105]

There is consensus that the engagement was well executed by the Allied forces while the German forces failed. Konstam noted that Operations Paravane, Obviate and Catechism were "well-planned and conducted" and "provided a neat ending to what had been a long and often tortuous aerial campaign".[40] Sweetman wrote that while the Royal Navy's aircraft and bombs could have destroyed Tirpitz "with luck", the combination of the highly-capable Lancaster bomber and the powerful Tallboy bomb was better suited to this task as it removed "any element of luck, provided accuracy could be obtained".[106] Bishop stated that while Tirpitz's crew "did their duty and defended their ship to the last", the Luftwaffe failed.[107] Jan Forsgren observed that the lack of attention given to the battleship's defence by the German high command was "quite remarkable" in light of the previous British attacks.[80]


Nos. 9 and 617 Squadrons have had a long-running rivalry over which unit deserves credit for destroying Tirpitz. This rivalry began immediately after Operation Catechism.[108] In 1950 the Norwegian Government presented the RAF with part of a bulkhead removed from the wreck which Tirpitz's crew had painted with a representation of the battleship. This was initially displayed at RAF Binbrook, from which both Nos. 9 and 617 Squadrons had operated during periods of World War II, but was soon stolen by No. 9 Squadron personnel who installed it at the unit's headquarters. Over the next 50 years the squadrons conducted elaborate operations to steal the trophy from one another. It was handed over to the Royal Air Force Museum in 2002, and is currently on display at Royal Air Force Museum London.[109]

Tirpitz is commemorated by several monuments. The main memorial is a small granite slab in memory of the ship and the sailors killed on board her, at the Ehrenfriedhof cemetery in Wilhelmshaven, Germany. Tirpitz survivors held a ceremony at the cemetery's chapel on 12 November each year until at least 2014.[107][110] The Tirpitz Museum at Kaafjord houses items and photographs associated with the battleship.[111] Other items removed from the wreck are on display at a museum in Tromsø as well as other museums around the world.[112] Some of the battleship's armour plates were sold to the Norwegian Public Roads Administration, which still uses them to cover excavations on roads in the Oslo region.[113] The remnants of the battleship that remain in the water off Håkøya have been registered as a protected area, and are treated as a war grave.[114]



  1. ^ Ellis 1999, pp. 294–295.
  2. ^ Bennett 2012, p. 9.
  3. ^ Faulkner & Wilkinson 2012, p. 109.
  4. ^ a b Konstam 2018, p. 6.
  5. ^ Bennett 2012, pp. 13–14.
  6. ^ Bennett 2012, p. 15.
  7. ^ Konstam 2018, p. 7.
  8. ^ a b c Bennett 2012, p. 19.
  9. ^ Roskill 1961, p. 161.
  10. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 85, 89.
  11. ^ Konstam 2018, p. 16.
  12. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 121.
  13. ^ Bishop 2012, pp. 340–341.
  14. ^ Bishop 2012, p. 341.
  15. ^ a b Konstam 2018, p. 77.
  16. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 123.
  17. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 125.
  18. ^ Zetterling & Tamelander 2009, pp. 296–297.
  19. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 126–127.
  20. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 113.
  21. ^ Konstam 2018, p. 81.
  22. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 126.
  23. ^ Konstam 2018, pp. 80–82.
  24. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 132–134.
  25. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 132.
  26. ^ Roskill 1961, p. 168.
  27. ^ a b c d e Sweetman 2000, p. 137.
  28. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 123.
  29. ^ a b c d Sweetman 2000, p. 138.
  30. ^ a b c Konstam 2018, p. 82.
  31. ^ Konstam 2018, p. 79.
  32. ^ a b Forsgren 2014, p. 126.
  33. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 124.
  34. ^ Bishop 2012, p. 350.
  35. ^ Knowles 2018, p. 270.
  36. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 122.
  37. ^ Zetterling & Tamelander 2009, p. 307.
  38. ^ a b c d e Bishop 2012, p. 352.
  39. ^ a b c Konstam 2018, p. 83.
  40. ^ a b Konstam 2018, p. 89.
  41. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 125.
  42. ^ a b Sweetman 2000, p. 139.
  43. ^ a b Zetterling & Tamelander 2009, p. 305.
  44. ^ a b Bishop 2012, p. 364.
  45. ^ Zetterling & Tamelander 2009, pp. 298, 305.
  46. ^ Forsgren 2014, pp. 127–128.
  47. ^ a b Bishop 2012, p. 354.
  48. ^ Nichol 2015, p. 259.
  49. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 128.
  50. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 129.
  51. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 157–159.
  52. ^ a b c d Brown 1977, p. 43.
  53. ^ Bishop 2012, p. 355.
  54. ^ Konstam 2018, p. 84.
  55. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 142.
  56. ^ a b c Garzke & Dulin 1985, p. 272.
  57. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 149.
  58. ^ a b c d Konstam 2018, p. 85.
  59. ^ a b Forsgren 2014, p. 136.
  60. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 167.
  61. ^ Nichol 2015, pp. 261–262.
  62. ^ Garzke & Dulin 1985, pp. 273–274.
  63. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 140.
  64. ^ Nichol 2015, p. 263.
  65. ^ a b c Sweetman 2000, p. 146.
  66. ^ a b Sweetman 2000, p. 144.
  67. ^ Nichol 2015, p. 267.
  68. ^ a b c d Bishop 2012, p. 362.
  69. ^ Zetterling & Tamelander 2009, p. 321.
  70. ^ Nichol 2015, p. 266.
  71. ^ a b c Forsgren 2014, p. 137.
  72. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 152.
  73. ^ a b Sweetman 2000, p. 145.
  74. ^ a b Forsgren 2014, p. 141.
  75. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 149.
  76. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 154.
  77. ^ Forsgren 2014, pp. 145–147.
  78. ^ Chorlton 2010, p. 22.
  79. ^ Nichol 2015, p. 271.
  80. ^ a b Forsgren 2014, p. 144.
  81. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 147.
  82. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 145.
  83. ^ a b Bishop 2012, p. 370.
  84. ^ a b Nichol 2015, p. 273.
  85. ^ Bishop 2012, p. 371.
  86. ^ "No. 36883". The London Gazette (Supplement). 5 January 1945. p. 273.
  87. ^ Knowles 2018, p. 281.
  88. ^ Ellis & Warhurst 1968, p. 129.
  89. ^ a b Sweetman 2000, p. 160.
  90. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 156–157.
  91. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 156.
  92. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 164–165.
  93. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 157.
  94. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 159.
  95. ^ Knowles 2018, p. 272.
  96. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 150–151.
  97. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 165–167.
  98. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 167–168.
  99. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 168.
  100. ^ Konstam 2018, pp. 88–89.
  101. ^ Zetterling & Tamelander 2009, p. 327.
  102. ^ Hinsley 1984, p. 277.
  103. ^ Sweetman 2000, p. 169.
  104. ^ Ellis 1999, pp. 299–300.
  105. ^ Langenberg 1981, p. 91.
  106. ^ Sweetman 2000, pp. 162–163.
  107. ^ a b Bishop 2012, p. 367.
  108. ^ Forsgren 2014, p. 155.
  109. ^ Forsgren 2014, pp. 156–157.
  110. ^ Koop & Schmolke 2014, p. 67.
  111. ^ "Tirpitz Museum". Tirpitz Museum. Archived from the original on 19 February 2019. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
  112. ^ Forsgren 2014, pp. 154–155.
  113. ^ Knowles 2018, p. 277.
  114. ^ Knowles 2018, p. 279.

Works consulted