Perpetrators, victims, and bystanders

Part of a series on
Genocide
Issues
List of genocides Genocides in history Effects on youth Denial Massacre Rape Incitement In relation to Colonialism / War Perpetrators, victims, and bystanders Prevention Psychology Recognition politics Risk factors Stages Types Anti-Indigenous Cultural Utilitarian Studies Outline Bibliography
15th–19th century genocides
Taíno Dzungar Indigenous Australian Black War Circassian Moriori Native American California Putumayo Selk'nam
Early 20th century genocides
Herero and Nama Greek Diyarbekir Sayfo Armenian Libyan
World War II (1939–1945)
The Holocaust Romani Poles Serbs Croats and Muslims
Cold War (1940s–1991)
Bangladesh Ikiza East Timor Cambodian Guatemalan Isaaq
Contemporary genocides
Bosnian Rwandan Effacer le tableau Darfur Yazidi Iraqi Turkmen Tamil Rohingya
Related topics
Anfal campaign Anti-communist mass killings Indonesia 1965–66 Atrocities in the Congo Free State Compulsory sterilization Democide Ethnic cleansing Ethnocide Forced assimilation Maafa Atlantic slave trade Black genocide in the United States Mass killings under communist regimes Holodomor / genocide question Massacre of Arabs during the Zanzibar Revolution Gukurahundi Massacres of Hutus during the First Congo War 2023 Israeli genocide accusation Palestinian genocide accusation 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza Persecution of Uyghurs in China Predictions of a genocide in Ethiopia Raphael Lemkin Transgender genocide Ukrainian genocide accusation
Category
v t e

In genocide studies, perpetrators, victims, and bystanders is an evolving typology for classifying the participants and observers of a genocide. The typology was first proposed by Raul Hilberg in the 1992 book Perpetrators Victims Bystanders: Jewish Catastrophe 1933–1945.^[2][3] Anthropologist Alexander Hinton credits work on this theory with sparking widespread public intolerance of mass violence, calling it a "proliferation of a post-cold war human rights regime that demanded action in response to atrocity and accountability for culprits.".^[4] The triad is also used in studying the psychology of genocide.^[5][6][7] It has become a key element of scholarship on genocide, with subsequent researchers refining the concept and applying it to new fields.

Initial analyses of atrocities such as the Holocaust discussed these events simply as violence by perpetrators against victims. Scholars added the category of "bystander" to include people who impact, and are impacted by, mass violence but who are not clearly perpetrators or victims.^[8] Even with this added complexity, most genocide research focuses on perpetrators, in part because evidence of their behavior is most accessible to scholars.^[9] While research about bystanders' role in violence dates to the mid twentieth century,^[10] research about their role in genocide is more recent.^[11] Just as emerging research has added complexity to the triad as a whole, it continues to recognize nuance in each of the three roles. 

Some researchers are expanding the triad and the situations to which the concept applies. For example,

Although it may seem clear who a "perpetrator" might be in an atrocity or act of violence, defining it specifically helps underscore why experts warn against assessing an atrocity as a simple battle between good and evil. Robert M. Ehrenreich and Tim Cole add to earlier scholarship from Raul Hilberg with their specific "prerequisites" for applying the perpetrator-victim-bystander triad.^[13] They also recognize that perpetrators are the most studied category, because perpetrators leave the most evidence. Ehrenreigh and Cole's definition of perpetrator, and use of these prerequisites, is heavily cited by other scholars. Their four prerequisities include the following:^[14]

1. Perpetrators hold the most power in the area where the conflict is taking place. In addition to power, they must have "legitimacy, authority, and control within the region."
2. Conflict, which Ehrenreich and Cole describe as "An actual or contrived stress must exist within the population of the region, which the perpetrators can exploit [to motivate support for their violence]."
3. The perpetrators blame this "actual or contrived stress" on a specific category of people. This category is "constructed": in other words, it is not naturally occurring and the individuals within the category created by the perpetrators might not consider themselves to be grouped in the same way. It might even defy evidence at hand to assert that those individuals genuinely constitute a single homogenous group separate from others. Because of this power, Ehrenreich and Cole emphasize, "These characteristics allow the perpetrators to dictate ethnic identity."^[15]
4. The groupings of perpetrator, victim, and bystander end when the act(s) of violence end.

The severity of a mass atrocity often relates to how rapidly perpetrators identify their victims and spring into mass violence. Using the Rwandan genocide as an example, Ehrenreich and Cole point out, "A rapid rate of destruction is preferable for the perpetrator group because it allots the least amount of time and therefore the fewest options for reaction by the victim group."^[16]

Victims

Part of the violence enacted by perpetrators upon victims is in this way that perpetrators define the

Victims are in part defined by their apparent lack of choices in the face of perpetrators' violence. Ehrenreich and Cole describe the victims' place in mass atrocity this way: “The spectrum for the victim group is not one of power or action (i.e., degree of involvement in or avoidance of the destruction process) but reaction. The only decisions open to the victim group are what survival strategies to attempt at any given moment in order to avoid an immediate or impending action by the perpetrator group." They go on to explain that victims' options are directly proportional to how rapidly the perpetrators are able to advance their acts of violence.[16]

Bystanders

Most researchers admit the role of "bystander" is the most complex and dynamic of the perpetrator-victim-bystander triad. Giorgia Donà explains the bystander category in her 2018 research about the

• Génocidaires
• Lonnie H. Athens
  .

References

1. ^ Sindelar, Daisy (23 April 2015). "1915: The Crumbling of an Empire, and the Massacre That Ensued". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
2. ISBN 978-0-06-099507-2
   .
3. ^ ^{a b} "What is left of Hilberg's triad 'Perpetrators-Victims-Bystanders?'". jhi.pl. Jewish Historical Institute. 25 April 2013. Archived from the original on 1 January 2018. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
4. ISBN 978-1-118-29062-0
   .
5. doi:10.1111/josi.12000
   .
6. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(93)90037-9
   .
7. S2CID 141171190
   .
8. ISSN 1462-3528
   .
9. ^ Ehrenreich and Cole, 2005, p. 224.
10. ISSN 2152-081X
    .
11. ^ Donà, 2018, p.3
12. PMID 33950087
    .
13. ^ Ehrenreich and Cole, 2005, p 215.
14. ^ Ehrenreich and Cole, 2005, p. 215.
15. ^ ^{a b} Ehrenreich and Cole, 2005, p. 217.
16. ^ ^{a b} Ehrenreich and Cole, 2005, p. 219.
17. ISSN 0038-0261
    .
18. ^ Donà, 2018, p. 3.
19. ^ Donà, 2018, p. 4
20. ^ ^{a b} Ehrenreich and Cole, 2005, 217-218.

Further reading

Main article:

Bibliography of Genocide studies

• Baum, Steven K. (2008). The Psychology of Genocide: Perpetrators, Bystanders, and Rescuers. Cambridge University Press.
  ISBN 978-0-521-71392-4
  .
• Horowitz, Sara R., ed. (2012). Back to the Sources: Reexamining Perpetrators, Victims, and Bystanders.
  ISBN 978-0-8101-2862-0
  .
• King, Régine Uwibereyeho; Sakamoto, Izumi (August 2015). "Disengaging from genocide harm-doing and healing together between perpetrators, bystanders, and victims in Rwanda". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 21 (3): 378–394.
  doi:10.1037/pac0000078
  .
• Ionescu, Stefan (2011). "Perpetrators, Bystanders, and Rescuers. Popular Attitudes Towards Ottoman Christians During the Armenian Genocide". Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review. 11 (2): 328–344.
  ISSN 1582-4551. CEEOL 167447
  .
• Morina, Christina; Thijs, Krijn, eds. (2018). Probing the Limits of Categorization: The Bystander in Holocaust History. Berghahn Books.
  ISBN 978-1-78920-093-5
  .
• Robben, Antonius C.G.M. and Alexander Laban Hinton (2023). Perpetrators: Encountering Humanity’s Dark Side. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-1-503-63427-5.

This article related to the Holocaust is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e