Portland cement

Portland cement is the most common type of
The cement was so named by Joseph Aspdin, who obtained a patent for it in 1824, because, once hardened, it resembled the fine, pale limestone known as
His son William Aspdin is regarded as the inventor of "modern" portland cement due to his developments in the 1840s.[1]
The low cost and widespread availability of the limestone, shales, and other naturally occurring materials used in portland cement make it a relatively cheap building material. At 4.4 billion tons manufactured (in 2023), Portland cement ranks third in the list (by mass) of manufactured materials, outranked only by sand and gravel. These two are combined, with water, to make the most manufactured material, concrete. This is Portland cement's most common use. [2]
History
Portland cement was developed from natural cements made in Britain beginning in the middle of the 18th century. Its name is derived from its similarity to Portland stone, a type of building stone quarried on the Isle of Portland in Dorset, England.[3] The development of modern portland cement (sometimes called ordinary or normal portland cement) began in 1756, when John Smeaton experimented with combinations of different limestones and additives, including trass and pozzolanas, intended for the construction of a lighthouse,[4] now known as Smeaton's Tower. In the late 18th century, Roman cement was developed and patented in 1796 by James Parker.[5] Roman cement quickly became popular, but was largely replaced by portland cement in the 1850s.[4] In 1811, James Frost produced a cement he called British cement.[5] James Frost is reported to have erected a manufactory for making of an artificial cement in 1826.[6] In 1811 Edgar Dobbs of Southwark patented a cement of the kind invented 7 years later by the French engineer Louis Vicat. Vicat's cement is an artificial hydraulic lime, and is considered the "principal forerunner"[4] of portland cement.

The name portland cement is recorded in a directory published in 1823 being associated with a William Lockwood and possibly others.[7] In his 1824 cement patent, Joseph Aspdin called his invention "portland cement" because of its resemblance to Portland stone.[3] Aspdin's cement was nothing like modern portland cement, but a first step in the development of modern portland cement, and has been called a "proto-portland cement".[4]

William Aspdin had left his father's company, to form his own cement manufactury. In the 1840s William Aspdin, apparently accidentally, produced calcium silicates which are a middle step in the development of portland cement. In 1848, William Aspdin further improved his cement. Then, in 1853, he moved to Germany, where he was involved in cement making.[7] William Aspdin made what could be called "meso-portland cement" (a mix of portland cement and hydraulic lime).[8] Isaac Charles Johnson further refined the production of "meso-portland cement" (middle stage of development), and claimed to be the real father of portland cement.[9]
In 1859, John Grant of the Metropolitan Board of Works, set out requirements for cement to be used in the
Portland cement had been imported into the United States from England and Germany, and in the 1870s and 1880s, it was being produced by Eagle Portland cement near Kalamazoo, Michigan. In 1875, the first portland cement was produced in the Coplay Cement Company Kilns under the direction of David O. Saylor in Coplay, Pennsylvania.[12] By the early 20th century, American-made portland cement had displaced most of the imported portland cement.
Composition
ASTM C219[13] defines portland cement as:
a hydraulic cement produced by pulverizing clinker, consisting essentially of crystalline hydraulic calcium silicates, and usually containing one or more of the following: water, calcium sulfate, up to 5 % limestone, and processing additions
The European Standard EN 197-1 uses the following definition:
Portland cement clinker is a hydraulic material which shall consist of at least two-thirds by mass of calcium silicates, (3 CaO·SiO2, and 2 CaO·SiO2), the remainder consisting of aluminium- and iron-containing clinker phases and other compounds. The ratio of CaO to SiO2 shall not be less than 2.0. The magnesium oxide content (MgO) shall not exceed 5.0% by mass.
(The last two requirements were already set out in the
Clinkers make up more than 90% of the cement, along with a limited amount of
Manufacturing

Portland cement clinker is made by heating, in a
The materials in cement clinker are alite, belite, tricalcium aluminate, and tetracalcium alumino ferrite. The aluminium, iron, and magnesium oxides are present as a flux allowing the calcium silicates to form at a lower temperature,[15] and contribute little to the strength. For special cements, such as low heat (LH) and sulphate resistant (SR) types, it is necessary to limit the amount of tricalcium aluminate (3 CaO·Al2O3) formed.
The major raw material for the clinker-making is usually
Cement grinding

To achieve the desired setting qualities in the finished product, a quantity (2–8%, but typically 5%) of calcium sulphate (usually
Clinker | CCN | Mass |
---|---|---|
Tricalcium silicate (CaO)3 · SiO2 | C3S | 25–50% |
Dicalcium silicate (CaO)2 · SiO2 | C2S | 20–45% |
Tricalcium aluminate (CaO)3 · Al2O3 | C3A | 5–12% |
Tetracalcium aluminoferrite (CaO)4 · Al2O3 · Fe2O3 |
C4AF | 6–12% |
Gypsum CaSO4 · 2 H2O | CS̅H2 | 2–10% |
Cement | CCN | Mass |
---|---|---|
Calcium oxide, CaO | C | 61–67% |
Silicon dioxide, SiO2 | S | 19–23% |
Aluminium oxide, Al2O3 | A | 2.5–6% |
Ferric oxide, Fe2O3 | F | 0–6% |
Sulphur (VI) oxide, SO3 | S̅ | 1.5–4.5% |
Setting and hardening
Cement sets when mixed with water by way of a complex series of chemical reactions that are still only partly understood.[16] A brief summary is as follows:
The clinker phases—calcium silicates and aluminates—dissolve into the water that is mixed with the cement, which results in a fluid containing relatively high concentrations of dissolved
Gypsum is included in the cement as an inhibitor to prevent flash (or quick) setting; if gypsum is not present, the initial formation of (needle-shaped) ettringite is not possible, and so (plate-shaped) hydrocalumite-group ("AFm") calcium aluminate phases form instead. This premature formation of AFm phases causes a rapid loss of flowability, which is generally not desirable because it means that placement of the cement or concrete is very difficult.[18]
Hardening of the cement then proceeds through further C-S-H formation, as this fills in the spaces between the (still-dissolving) cement grains with newly formed solid phases. Portlandite also precipitates from the pore solution to form part of the solid microstructure, and some of the initially-formed ettringite may be converted to AFm phases, releasing part of the sulfate from its structure to continue reacting with any remaining tricalcium aluminate[19]
Use
The most common use for portland cement is in the production of concrete. (cement/water mixes squeezed into gaps to consolidate foundations, road-beds, etc.).
When water is mixed with portland cement, the product sets in a few hours and hardens over a period of weeks. These processes can vary widely, depending upon the mix used and the conditions of curing of the product,[22] but a typical concrete sets in about 6 hours and develops a compressive strength of 8 MPa in 24 hours. The strength rises to 15 MPa at 3 days, 23 MPa at 1 week, 35 MPa at 4 weeks, and 41 MPa at 3 months. In principle, the strength continues to rise slowly as long as water is available for continued hydration, but concrete is usually allowed to dry out after a few weeks and this causes strength growth to stop.
Types
General
ASTM C150
Five types of portland cements exist, with variations of the first three according to ASTM C150.[23][24]
Type I portland cement is known as common or general-purpose cement. It is generally assumed unless another type is specified. It is commonly used for general construction, especially when making precast, and precast-prestressed concrete that is not to be in contact with soils or ground water. The typical compound compositions of this type are:
55% (C3S), 19% (C2S), 10% (C3A), 7% (C4AF), 2.8% MgO, 2.9% (SO3), 1.0% ignition loss, and 1.0% free CaO (utilizing cement chemist notation).
A limitation on the composition is that the (C3A) shall not exceed 15%.
Type II provides moderate sulphate resistance, and gives off less heat during hydration. This type of cement costs about the same as type I. Its typical compound composition is:
51% (C3S), 24% (C2S), 6% (C3A), 11% (C4AF), 2.9% MgO, 2.5% (SO3), 0.8% ignition loss, and 1.0% free CaO.
A limitation on the composition is that the (C3A) shall not exceed 8%, which reduces its vulnerability to sulphates. This type is for general construction exposed to moderate sulphate attack, and is meant for use when concrete is in contact with soils and ground water, especially in the western United States due to the high sulphur content of the soils. Because of similar price to that of type I, type II is much used as a general purpose cement, and the majority of portland cement sold in North America meets this specification.
Note: Cement meeting (among others) the specifications for types I and II has become commonly available on the world market.
Type III has relatively high early strength. Its typical compound composition is:
57% (C3S), 19% (C2S), 10% (C3A), 7% (C4AF), 3.0% MgO, 3.1% (SO3), 0.9% ignition loss, and 1.3% free CaO.
This cement is similar to type I, but ground finer. Some manufacturers make a separate clinker with higher C3S and/or C3A content, but this is increasingly rare, and the general purpose clinker is usually used, ground to a specific surface area typically 50–80% higher. The gypsum level may also be increased a small amount. This gives the concrete using this type of cement a three-day compressive strength equal to the seven-day compressive strength of types I and II. Its seven-day compressive strength is almost equal to 28-day compressive strengths of types I and II. The only downside is that the six-month strength of type III is the same or slightly less than that of types I and II. Therefore, the long-term strength is sacrificed. It is usually used for precast concrete manufacture, where high one-day strength allows fast turnover of molds. It may also be used in emergency construction and repairs, and construction of machine bases and gate installations.
Type IV portland cement is generally known for its low heat of hydration. Its typical compound composition is:
28% (C3S), 49% (C2S), 4% (C3A), 12% (C4AF), 1.8% MgO, 1.9% (SO3), 0.9% ignition loss, and 0.8% free CaO.
The percentages of (C2S) and (C4AF) are relatively high and (C3S) and (C3A) are relatively low. A limitation on this type is that the maximum percentage of (C3A) is seven, and the maximum percentage of (C3S) is thirty-five. This causes the heat given off by the
Type V is used where sulphate resistance is important. Its typical compound composition is:
38% (C3S), 43% (C2S), 4% (C3A), 9% (C4AF), 1.9% MgO, 1.8% (SO3), 0.9% ignition loss, and 0.8% free CaO.
This cement has a very low (C3A) composition which accounts for its high sulphate resistance. The maximum content of (C3A) allowed is 5% for type V portland cement. Another limitation is that the (C4AF) + 2(C3A) composition cannot exceed 20%. This type is used in concrete to be exposed to
Types Ia, IIa, and IIIa have the same composition as types I, II, and III. The only difference is that in Ia, IIa, and IIIa, an air-entraining agent is ground into the mix. The air-entrainment must meet the minimum and maximum optional specification found in the ASTM manual. These types are only available in the eastern United States and Canada, only on a limited basis. They are a poor approach[clarification needed] to air-entrainment which improves resistance to freezing under low temperatures.
Types II(MH) and II(MH)a have a similar composition as types II and IIa, but with a mild heat.
EN 197 norm
The European norm EN 197-1 defines five classes of common cement that comprise portland cement as a main constituent. These classes differ from the ASTM classes.
Class | Description | Constituents |
---|---|---|
CEM I | Portland cement | Comprising portland cement and up to 5% of minor additional constituents |
CEM II | Portland-composite cement | Portland cement and up to 35% of other* single constituents |
CEM III | Blast furnace cement | Portland cement and higher percentages of blast furnace slag |
CEM IV | Pozzolanic cement | Portland cement and up to 55% of pozzolanic constituents |
CEM V | Composite cement | Portland cement, blast furnace slag or fly ash and pozzolana |
*Constituents that are permitted in portland-composite cements are artificial pozzolans (blast furnace slag (in fact a latent hydraulic binder), silica fume, and fly ashes), or natural pozzolans (siliceous or siliceous aluminous materials such as volcanic ash glasses, calcined clays and shale).
CSA A3000-08
The Canadian standards describe six main classes of cement, four of which can also be supplied as a blend containing ground limestone (where a suffix L is present in the class names).
Class | Description |
---|---|
GU, GUL (a.k.a. Type 10 (GU) cement) | General use cement |
MS | Moderate sulphate resistant cement |
MH, MHL | Moderate heat cement |
HE, HEL | High early strength cement |
LH, LHL | Low heat cement |
HS | High sulphate resistant; generally develops strength less rapidly than the other types. |
White portland cement
Safety issues
Bags of cement routinely have health and safety warnings printed on them, because not only is cement highly
The production of comparatively low-alkalinity cements (pH<11) is an area of ongoing investigation.[29]
In
In the US, the
Environmental effects
This section needs additional citations for verification. (February 2020) |
Portland cement manufacture can cause
2 from the raw materials during manufacture, and damage to countryside from quarrying. Equipment to reduce dust emissions during quarrying and manufacture of cement is widely used, and equipment to trap and separate exhaust gases are coming into increased use. Environmental protection also includes the re-integration of quarries into the countryside after they have been closed down by returning them to nature or re-cultivating them.
Portland cement is
Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Sulfur Dioxide Exposure in Portland Cement Plants, from the
Workers at portland cement facilities, particularly those burning fuel containing sulfur, should be aware of the acute and chronic effects of exposure to SO
2 [sulfur dioxide], and peak and full-shift concentrations of SO
2 should be periodically measured.[34]
An independent research effort of
The CO
2 associated with portland cement manufacture comes mainly from four sources:
CO 2 source |
Amount |
---|---|
Decarbonation of limestone | Fairly constant: minimum around 0.47 kg (1.0 lb) CO 2 per kg of cement, maximum 0.54, typical value around 0.50 worldwide.[citation needed] |
Kiln fuel combustion | Varies with plant efficiency: efficient precalciner plant 0.24 kg (0.53 lb) CO 2 per kg cement, low-efficiency wet process as high as 0.65, typical modern practices (e.g. UK) averaging around 0.30.[citation needed] |
Produced by vehicles in cement plants and distribution | Almost insignificant at 0.002–0.005. So typical total CO 2 is around 0.80 kg (1.8 lb) CO 2 per kg finished cement. |
Electrical power generation | Varies with local power source. Typical electrical energy consumption is on the order of 90–150 kWh per tonne cement, equivalent to 0.09–0.15 kg (0.20–0.33 lb) CO 2 per kg finished cement if the electricity is coal-generated. |
Overall, with nuclear or hydroelectric power, and efficient manufacturing, CO
2 generation can be reduced to 0.7 kg (1.5 lb) per kg cement, but can be twice as high.[clarification needed] The thrust of innovation for the future is to reduce sources 1 and 2 by modification of the chemistry of cement, by the use of wastes, and by adopting more efficient processes.[citation needed] Although cement manufacturing is clearly a very large CO
2 emitter, concrete (of which cement makes up about 15%) compares quite favourably with other modern building systems in this regard.[citation needed]. Traditional materials such as lime based mortars as well as timber and earth based construction methods emit significantly less CO2.[36]
Cement plants used for waste disposal or processing

Due to the high temperatures inside cement kilns, combined with the oxidising (oxygen-rich) atmosphere and long residence times, cement kilns are used as a processing option for various types of waste streams; indeed, they efficiently destroy many hazardous organic compounds. The waste streams also often contain combustible materials which allow the substitution of part of the fossil fuel normally used in the process.
Waste materials used in cement kilns as a fuel supplement:[37]
- Car and truck tires – steel belts are easily tolerated in the kilns
- Paint sludge from automobile industries
- Waste solvents and lubricants
- Meat and bone meal – slaughterhouse waste due to bovine spongiform encephalopathy contamination concerns
- Waste plastics
- Sewage sludge
- Rice hulls
- Sugarcane waste
- Used wooden railroad ties (railway sleepers)
- Spent cell liner from the aluminium smelting industry (also called spent pot liner)
Portland cement manufacture also has the potential to benefit from using industrial byproducts from the waste stream.[38] These include in particular:
- Slag
- Fly ash(from power plants)
- Silica fume (from steel mills)
- Synthetic gypsum (from desulphurisation)
See also
- American Concrete Institute
- Calcium silicate hydrate – Main product of the hydration of Portland cement
- Energetically modified cement – Class of cements, mechanically processed to transform reactivity
- Environmental impact of concrete
- Lime mortar – Building material
- Marl – Lime-rich mud or mudstone which contains variable amounts of clays and silt
- Portland Cement Association – American industry organization
- Portland, New Zealand – locality in Whangarei District, Northland Region, New Zealand
- Portland Cement Works Precinct – Disused industrial site in Australia
- Rosendale cement – Construction material
References
- ^ ISBN 978-1616144814. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
- ^ "Cement Statistics and Information". USGS.gov. United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 21 March 2025.
- ^ ISBN 978-91-7332-906-4.
- ^ a b c d e Robert G. Blezard, "The History of Calcareous Cements" in Hewlett, Peter C., ed.. Leaʼs chemistry of cement and concrete. 4. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004. 1–24. Print.
- ^ a b Saikia, Mimi Das. Bhargab Mohan Das, Madan Mohan Das. Elements of Civil Engineering. New Delhie: PHI Learning Private Limited. 2010. 30. Print.
- ^ Reid, Henry (1868). A practical treatise on the manufacture of Portland cement. London: E. & F.N. Spon.
- ^ a b Francis, A.J. (1977). The Cement Industry 1796–1914: A History.
- .
- ^ Hahn, Thomas F., and Emory Leland Kemp. Cement mills along the Potomac River. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press, 1994. 16. Print.
- ^ Reid, Henry (1877). The Science and Art of the Manufacture of Portland Cement with observations on some of its constructive applications. London: E&F.N. Spon.
- ^ "125 Years of Research for Quality and Progress". German Cement Works' Association. Archived from the original on 16 January 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Meade, Richard Kidder. Portland cement: its composition, raw materials, manufacture, testing and analysis. Easton, PA: 1906. The Chemical Publishing Co. 4–14. Print.
- ^ "ASTM C219-25, Standard Terminology Relating to Hydraulic and Other Inorganic Cements". ASTM International. 8 January 2025.
- ^ Dylan Moore. "Cement Kilns: Clinker Thermochemistry". cementkilns.co.uk. Archived from the original on 6 March 2014.
- ^ McArthur, Hugh, and Duncan Spalding. Engineering materials science: properties, uses, degradation and remediation. Chichester, U.K.: Horwood Pub., 2004. 217. Print.
- ISSN 0008-8846. Retrieved 20 February 2023.
- ISBN 9780071797870.
- ^ Monteiro, P.J.M. "Lectures - Cements". UC Berkeley. Retrieved 25 February 2025.
- .
- ^ "Housing Prototypes: Page Street". housingprototypes.org. Archived from the original on 16 September 2012. Retrieved 19 January 2007.
- doi:10.3133/mcs2020
- ^ "Portland Cement Strength – Pavement Interactive". Retrieved 16 August 2024.
- ^ . Retrieved 16 May 2017.
- ^ The contractor's guide to quality concrete construction. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: American Society of Concrete Contractors ;, 2005. 17. Print.
- ^ "HSE information sheet: Cement" (PDF). UK: Health and Safety Executive. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 15 February 2011.
- ISBN 978-0-323-02409-9.
- PMID 6714189.
- PMID 9155779.
- (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ "CDC – NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards – portland cement". www.cdc.gov. Archived from the original on 21 November 2015. Retrieved 21 November 2015.
- (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ "Technology Roadmap - Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry: Foldout". IEA webstore.
- .
- ^ "Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Sulfur Dioxide Exposure in Portland Cement Plants". cdc.gov. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017.
- ^ "Toward a Sustainable Cement Industry: Environment, Health & Safety Performance Improvement" (PDF). wbcsd.ch. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2006.
- ^ Kent, Douglas (22 October 2007). "Response: Lime is a much greener option than cement, says Douglas Kent". the Guardian. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
- ^ Chris Boyd (December 2001). "Recovery of Wastes in Cement Kilns" (PDF). World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Archived from the original on 24 June 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2008.
- ISBN 978-0-89312-087-0.
As a generalization, probably 50% of all industrial byproducts have potential as raw materials for the manufacture of portland cement.
External links
- World Production of Hydraulic Cement, by Country
- Alpha The Guaranteed Portland Cement Company: 1917 Trade Literature from Smithsonian Institution Libraries
- Cement Sustainability Initiative[usurped]
- A cracking alternative to cement
- Aerial views of the world's largest concentration of cement manufacturing capacity, Saraburi Province, Thailand, at 14°37′57″N 101°04′38″E / 14.6325°N 101.0771°E
- Fountain, Henry (30 March 2009). "Concrete Is Remixed With Environment in Mind". The New York Times. Retrieved 30 March 2009.
- CDC – NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards
Further reading
- Gharpure, A.; Heim Jw, I. I.; Vander Wal, R. L. (2021). "Characterization and Hazard Identification of Respirable Cement and Concrete Dust from Construction Activities". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18 (19): 10126. PMID 34639428.
- Liu, Jia; Zhang, Yongming; Zhang, Qixing; Wang, Jinjun (2018). "Scattering Matrix for Typical Urban Anthropogenic Origin Cement Dust and Discrimination of Representative Atmospheric Particulates". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 123 (6): 3159–3174. S2CID 135035398.
- ISBN 978-0-7277-2592-9.
- Peter Hewlett; Martin Liska (2019). Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-08-100795-2.