Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough
Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough (
An important theme of the Remarks, and one which Wittgenstein would later explore more fully, is the conception of metaphysics as a "kind of magic". The text was edited by Rush Rhees, who published them separately from Wittgenstein's other work, in a possible attempt to avoid alienating Wittgenstein's readership, in light of the sympathy shown to primitive thought and practices.[2] In the Remarks, Wittgenstein famously described Frazer as more savage than those he studied, and was exceptionally critical of Frazer's interpretations[3] of primitive mythology, Christianity, and epistemology.
The remarks were later included in full in an anthology of Wittgenstein's miscellaneous work called Philosophical Occasions 1912-1951. The editors claim that Rush Rhees omitted a number of remarks from the bilingual book edition of the Remarks, and include in their anthology some remarks they believe Rhees may have erroneously excluded.[4]
Further reading
Ludwig Wittgenstein, The Mythology in Our Language. Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough, (German/English parallel text), Transl. by S. Palmié, Ed. by Giovanni da Col and S. Palmié, with critical reflections by V. Das, W. James, H. Kwon, M. Lambek, S. Laugier, K. Myhre,
External links
References
- ISBN 978-0872201552, pp. 118–155 in (German and English), http://www.ilwg.eu/
- ^ Zengotita T., (1989), On Wittgenstein's Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Nov., 1989), pp. 390–398 JSTOR
- ^ Eldridge R., (1987), Hypotheses, Criterial Claims, and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein's ‘Remarks on Frazer's The Golden Bough’, Philosophical Investigations, Vol.10, Iss. 3, pp. 226–245, July 1987; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9205.1987.tb00216.x/abstract
- ISBN 978-0-87220-155-2.