Sharp power
Sharp power is the use of
History
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) popularised the term "sharp power" (in use since the early 19th century[1]) in November 2017; it appeared in an article in Foreign Affairs magazine describing aggressive and subversive policies employed by authoritarian governments as a projection of state power in democratic countries, policies that cannot be described[by whom?] as either hard power or soft power.[2][need quotation to verify] The NED article specifically names the Russian state-funded RT News Network and the Chinese state-sponsored Confucius Institute educational partnerships as examples of sharp power. According NED, autocratic states "are not necessarily seeking to "win hearts and minds" (the common frame of reference for soft power efforts), but they are surely seeking to manipulate their target audiences by distorting the information that reaches them.[3][need quotation to verify]
Since 2018 the term "sharp power" has been used in news articles, scholarly discussions, and Congressional hearings. Representatives of the Chinese Communist Party have used the phrase, dismissing Western claims that their country has engaged in sharp-power practices.[4]
Overview
Sharp power can include attempts by one country to manipulate and manage information about itself in the news media and educational systems of another country, for the purpose of misleading or dividing public opinion in a target country, or for masking or diverting attention away from negative information about itself.[3]
Sharp power, as stated by Christopher Walker "takes advantage of the asymmetry between free and unfree systems, allowing authoritarian regimes both to limit free expression and to distort political environments in democracies while simultaneously shielding their own domestic public spaces from democratic appeals coming from abroad.”[3]
Soft power policies can include
Sharp power often has a digital element to it. In particular Chinese exercises in sharp power are carried out almost entirely online.[5]
See also
- Soft power
- Hard power
- Smart power
- Power projection
- Power (international relations)
- Power (social and political)
- Abusive power and control
- Political warfare
- Psychological warfare and propaganda
- Active measures
- Hostage diplomacy
References
- ^ Historical frequency of use of the phrase
- ^ Christopher Walker and Jessica Ludwig (November 16, 2017). "The Meaning of Sharp Power: How Authoritarian States Project Influence". Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on September 12, 2018. Retrieved July 11, 2018.
{{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires|magazine=(help) - ^ S2CID 158305285.
- ^ "Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference spokesman addresses Western charges of China using 'sharp power'". China Global Television Network. March 2, 2018. Archived from the original on July 1, 2019. Retrieved July 11, 2018.
- ^ Wyeth, Grant. "Australia Aims to Combat Disinformation". thediplomat.com. The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 22 June 2020. Retrieved 23 June 2020.
External links
- "From 'Soft Power' to 'Sharp Power': Revisiting the Conceptual Vocabulary." National Endowment for Democracy. December 8, 2017. https://www.ned.org/sharp-power-rising-authoritarian-influence-forum-report/
- "Rubio Chairs China Commission Hearing on Beijing's Exporting of Authoritarianism." Senator Marco Rubio (December 13, 2017). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H4OuSJVHdQ&t=10m58s
- "Sunlight v subversion: What to do about China’s 'sharp power'." The Economist (December 14, 2017). https://www.economist.com/leaders/2017/12/14/what-to-do-about-chinas-sharp-power
- "China's Sharp and Soft Power." The Stimson Center (May 31, 2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dx8aBAhaUw&t=29m11s
- "Sharp Power and Democratic Resilience Series" (June 18, 2021). https://www.ned.org/sharp-power-and-democratic-resilience-series/