Talk:VanossGaming: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
m Transcluding GA review
promote VanossGaming to good article (GANReviewTool)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|02:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Idiosincrático|Idiosincrático]] ([[User talk:Idiosincrático|talk]])|page=3|subtopic=Video games|status=onreview|note=Previous reviewer abandoned|shortdesc=Canadian YouTuber and music producer}}
{{talk header}}
{{talk header}}
{{Not a forum}}
{{Not a forum}}
{{GA|08:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)|topic=Media and drama|page=3|oldid=1194569443}}
{{FailedGA|00:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)|page=1|subtopic=Video games|oldid=1177560232|note=|shortdesc=Canadian YouTuber and music producer}}
{{FailedGA|00:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)|page=1|subtopic=Video games|oldid=1177560232|note=|shortdesc=Canadian YouTuber and music producer}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|class=B|living=yes|listas=VanossGaming|a&e-work-group=yes|a&e-priority=low|sports-work-group=yes|sports-priority=low}}
{{WikiProject Biography|class=GA|living=yes|listas=VanossGaming|a&e-work-group=yes|a&e-priority=low|sports-work-group=yes|sports-priority=low}}
{{WikiProject YouTube|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject YouTube|class=GA|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture|class=B|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture|class=GA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Canada|class=B|importance=Low|Toronto=yes|on=yes|Toronto-importance=low|music=yes}}
{{WikiProject Canada|class=GA|importance=Low|Toronto=yes|on=yes|Toronto-importance=low|music=yes}}
{{WikiProject Video games|class=B|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Video games|class=GA|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Comedy|class=B|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Comedy|class=GA|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Electronic Music|class=B|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Electronic Music|class=GA|importance=low}}
}}
}}
{{banner holder |collapsed=yes|1=
{{banner holder |collapsed=yes|1=

Revision as of 08:16, 11 January 2024

WikiProject iconCanada: Ontario / Toronto / Music GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject icon
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.
WikiProject iconVideo games GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
WikiProject iconComedy GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
project's importance scale
.

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:VanossGaming/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Czarking0 (talk · contribs) 22:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hello I will be reviewing this article for GA Czarking0 (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am failing this due to style concerns, some sections I suspect lack notability, in some areas the sources are not so good. Many specifics listed below Czarking0 (talk) 00:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EarlyLife

This sentence is out of the WP:MOS since "claimed" brings doubt. "He claimed that he was not introduced to video games at a young age as his parents encouraged him to play ice hockey and to focus on school work." Source 1 is himself claiming this which is not sufficient citation for this claim. The cbc article does not say his parents encouraged him to play ice hockey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarking0 (talkcontribs) 23:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Hockey

Is this actually a notable part of his life? A person mentioning a part of their childhood on their social media does not seem to meet the WP bar for notability even if that social media has a lot of following. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarking0 (talkcontribs) 22:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Addressed – I've condensed this section a little bit and combined it with the early life section, I still believe his participation in the Ontario league, his teams and stats are notable. I also removed the statement on him reminiscing online about it. I'd like to think this is enough, please let me know if it isn't. Idiosincrático (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll defer to the author since Canadian Hokey culture is not a knowledge area for me.  Done Czarking0 (talk) 17:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

This article has very little to do with the University he dropped out of after two years. I would remove that image. I like the images of other people you included. Some of his logos would be nice to have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarking0 (talkcontribs) 23:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Addressed – I've removed the image, I've tried in the past to add his current logo, however it is under copyright and could only be included in the infobox, the infobox imo is big enough. I'm pretty happy with the amount of images on the page.

Youtube Channel

"During his early years on YouTube, he met several other creators who would eventually feature frequently in his videos. His channel achieved popularity soon after, and by 2014 it had surpassed 10 million subscribers." When are the early years? "soon after" is against WP:MOS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarking0 (talkcontribs) 23:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Addressed – Removed completely

"with commentators identifying him as a central figure in the growing video game commentary subculture." Your source does not say this

  • Addressed – Removed completely

Your source does highlight how this is very different from what is available on TV. I think that is notable. You say that he was formerly partnered with Machinima but never mention that partnership starting. If it is worth saying he was partnered with them then it is worth saying how that started and when. You say Jetpak is a subsidiary of 3Blackdot, why is that notable I have no idea who 3Blackdot is.

  • Addressed – I've mentioned the "tuning out of TV" from the CBC source. I've mentioned he joined Machinima early in his career as I don't have a source too say exactly when; I've shaped the paragraph to fit your points. I removed the mention of 3Blackdot, it is covered only in the other projects section.

This is not encyclopedic style: "Fong's social impact on boys and adolescents was analysed and published in the New Media & Society journal in 2018, his content was said to reflect a "broader shift in youth culture among the contemporary generation," whereby Fong and PewDiePie reportedly explore complex "shades of grey" in masculine performance.[15]"

  • Addressed – I removed the comments after mentioning the publication, leaving only: "Fong's social impact on boys and adolescents was analysed and published in the New Media & Society journal in 2018"

Don't tell the reader what he doesn't do. This section of the article has far too much narrative style. Including the sentence following this quote: "Fong rarely uploads 'let's play' content, in which the viewer experiences most elements of a gameplay session, including parts which might be considered boring or uninteresting.[‡ 5] Whilst he doesn't upload in this style, he acknowledged in 2015 that it is a popular format and that audiences may want "that full experience where they actually feel like they're sitting next to the guy playing in his living room and watch the whole thing, even the slow downtimes".[‡ 5]"

  • Addressed – I agree, I've completely removed the narrative writing in this section.

Does he do his own editing? This would be the time to mention the editorial team.

  • I imagine he has an editorial team, however I have no source which discusses this. The only mention of something similar to this is what I've already mentioned from the PAX convention, which is that he can spend large amounts of time perfecting the format and editing style of his videos etc.

"VanossGaming was named one of the top influencers within the gaming industry in 2017 by Forbes;[20]" This is not encyclopedic style

  • Addressed – reworded

"In a survey published by Variety in July 2015, Fong was ranked among the most influential content creators on YouTube for American children aged 13–17 in accordance with criteria including approachability and authenticity.[23]" Ditto

  • Addressed – removed

Czarking0 (talk) 23:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Other Projects

"In 2021, Fong was reportedly still active within the brand partnership, merchandise and social media sectors of the company." This is out of WP:MOS

  • Addressed – removed.

"On November 2, 2016, it was announced that Fong was going to feature in a computer-animated series entitled Paranormal Action Squad, written by Michael Rowe" Passive voice also just a bad way to encyclopedicly explain something that happened.

  • Addressed – changed to "Fong featured in a computer-animated series..."

"The show received mixed reviews, Brittany Vincent from Decider called the show "dim-witted" and "the worst kind of comedy",[47] whereas Walter from Bubbleblabber praised the show's writing, casting and plot line, leaving an overall rating of 9/10.[49]" Not encyclopedic

  • Addressed – removed.

" The piece is a dubstep, trap and heavy electronic dance song which demonstrates Rynx's capacity to deliver "lush melodic build-ups" according to EDM Sauce." ditto

  • Addressed – removed

"Commenting on his "Read My Mind" single featuring Mainland, he told British magazine Wonderland" ditto

"I wanted to make a song that had a very human feel within the electronic realm. That’s why the whole song was based off an upright bass line. I combined that with some slab bass textures and real electric and acoustic guitars. All while still being held together with electronic drums and synths." This is quote about one song he wrote. Is this really that notable?

  • Addressed – removed

"In September 2019, he announced on Twitter that he would be going on tour in October and November at selected locations in the United States and Canada including San Francisco, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and Toronto.[‡ 6] On October 15, Fong stated on Twitter that he was ruining his health as a result of his tour preparation,[‡ 7] he later announced on YouTube that his tour was delayed (except the Los Angeles trip) until February 2020.[‡ 8]" I am guessing the tour never happened? Is this notable?

  • Addressed – I'm pretty sure it happened right before covid, but I agree and I've removed it...

Is a list of songs he remixed actually notable?

  • Addressed – removed

Czarking0 (talk) 23:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review, I've left a note on your talk page @Czarking0. Idiosincrático (talk) 08:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:VanossGaming/GA2
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Czarking0 (talk · contribs) 17:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Working off comments on GA review 1. I think you addressed all these.

I think the wikiproject tags for business and hokey should be removed. I don't think mentioning topics within a person's bio indicates that the page is of interest to that wikiproject.

  • Done – Thanks for taking the time to review the article :) Idiosincrático (talk) 00:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Idiosincrático: Unfortunately it looks like this review is abandoned as the reviewer hasn't edited since minutes after they started the review. Probably best to either try to find a new reviewer or request that this review be marked as abandoned. -- ZooBlazer 00:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think its pretty clear that I've assassinated my reviewer. Idiosincrático (talk) 02:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is
transcluded from Talk:VanossGaming/GA3
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zippybonzo (talk · contribs) 08:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


WP:WIAGA
for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the
    list incorporation
    :
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
    the layout style guideline
    :
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    A lot of the sources could be considered as unreliable, however the primary sources are indicated as primary sources in the references section, however there are inline citations.
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
    Couldn't find any copyvios
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it
    neutral
    ?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
    edit war
    or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are
    copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
    :
    B. Images are
    suitable captions
    :
    All image copyright tags look to be in order.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.