User talk:Bine Mai: Difference between revisions

nominate

) 16:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

	Romanian Barnstar of National Merit
	Appreciate the decent work you've been doing on things like Romanian power stations, viaducts etc. Keep it up, Romania badly needs decent editors to expand coverage!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Henrique de Jesus Bernardo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jean-Pierre Adams

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 17:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Navibulgar

Is Navibulgar the same as Navigation Maritime Bulgare? Mjroots (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes it's the same company. Why do you ask? BineMai 22:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elnur Abdullayev

The article Elnur Abdullayev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails

WP:GNG

and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:44, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ilyas Gurbanov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilyas Gurbanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilyas Gurbanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 14:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sahil Kerimov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahil Kerimov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahil Kerimov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 14:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Euromall Piteşti

The article Euromall Piteşti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN 215,278 sq ft mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alba Mall

The article Alba Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN 144,236 sq ft mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 04:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Porcinio Prata Junior

The article Ricardo Porcinio Prata Junior has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails

WP:GNG

and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Romanian websites by number of unique visitors

The article List of Romanian websites by number of unique visitors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I think this article is limited and outdated. Since 2009, 5 years passed so I'm sure statistics are changed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yacatisma (talk) 06:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fábio Camillo de Brito

The article

Fábio Camillo de Brito has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Article has no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

talk) 14:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chomutov Wind Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chomutov Wind Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 07:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aviat diamond mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviat diamond mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 01:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Star diamond mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mine does not exist. Single source listed does not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Orion South diamond mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mine does not exist. Single source listed does not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leadbetter diamond mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mine does not exist. Single source listed does not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Renard diamond mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Enough Information has been found to verify this article. Turgan ^Talk 17:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Qilalugaq diamond mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mine does not exist. Single source listed does not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that you appear to have been duped into creating articles on mines that don't exist, or don't have the mass of minerals claimed. It seems to be that somebody has created a scam about mining investments, and some gotten press in the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nonglom mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonglom mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kelapstick^(bainuu) 17:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aleksandre Intskirveli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails

WP:GNG

and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Foam Lake mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a mine. Exploration property

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zhonghe mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a mine. Exploration property

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan ^Talk 20:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What do you think about the inclusion of the article Origin of the Romanians into Category:Nomadic_groups_in_Eurasia? If you are against, please submit a comment at Talk:Origin_of_the_Romanians 84.197.146.185 (talk) 06:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Barun-Shiveinsky mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Besides the location not being in Mongolia at all, the cited source says "The deposit is small, mined out", so I don't see how this can be a useful article. The author seems to have created a lot of articles by copying and pasting a template text, without actually checking most of the details at the time. (I've already fixed about a dozen articles falsely claiming "largest reserves in Asia and the world" for mongolian mines).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Latebird (talk) 14:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Asif Abbasov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 14:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Samir Abdulov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Emin Amiraslanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 14:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javad Mirzaev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javad Mirzaev (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orkhan Mirzaev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orkhan Mirzaev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asif Abbasov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif Abbasov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samir Abdulov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samir Abdulov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emin Amiraslanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emin Amiraslanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir Kindly inform that the following. we are specializing for electrical and solar energy located in Arab Egypt and We are looking to partner with a company like you to manufacture solar panel and pv here in Egypt and middle east to covering the Egypt and middle east. If you have interest please us to explain more on 00201004602668 email [email protected] skype mohamed.abdelatty7 W B R — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.133.255.215 (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blake Burdette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. kelapstick^(bainuu) 11:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foam Lake mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foam Lake mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kelapstick^(bainuu) 11:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valja Strzh mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valja Strzh mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rio Tuba mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I shouldn't have to explain why Slideshare is not a source suitable enough to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:22, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Koridor coal mine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability, almost every article that this user creates says it is "one of the largest X reserves in X" so I don't trust that claim.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]