Spin network
This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2022) |
In
Roger Penrose described spin networks in 1971.[1] Spin networks have since been applied to the theory of quantum gravity by Carlo Rovelli, Lee Smolin, Jorge Pullin, Rodolfo Gambini and others.
Spin networks can also be used to construct a particular
Definition
Penrose's definition
A spin network, as described in Penrose (1971),[1] is a kind of diagram in which each line segment represents the world line of a "unit" (either an elementary particle or a compound system of particles). Three line segments join at each vertex. A vertex may be interpreted as an event in which either a single unit splits into two or two units collide and join into a single unit. Diagrams whose line segments are all joined at vertices are called closed spin networks. Time may be viewed as going in one direction, such as from the bottom to the top of the diagram, but for closed spin networks the direction of time is irrelevant to calculations.
Each line segment is labelled with an integer called a
Given any closed spin network, a non-negative integer can be calculated which is called the norm of the spin network. Norms can be used to calculate the
- Triangle inequality: a ≤ b + c and b ≤ a + c and c ≤ a + b.
- Fermion conservation: a + b + c must be an even number.
For example, a = 3, b = 4, c = 6 is impossible since 3 + 4 + 6 = 13 is odd, and a = 3, b = 4, c = 9 is impossible since 9 > 3 + 4. However, a = 3, b = 4, c = 5 is possible since 3 + 4 + 5 = 12 is even, and the triangle inequality is satisfied. Some conventions use labellings by half-integers, with the condition that the sum a + b + c must be a whole number.
Formal approach to definition
Formally, a spin network may be defined as a (directed)
Properties
A spin network, immersed into a manifold, can be used to define a
Usage in physics
In the context of loop quantum gravity
In
One of the key results of loop quantum gravity is
where the sum goes over all intersections i of Σ with the spin network. In this formula,
- ℓPL is the Planck length,
- is the Immirzi parameter and
- ji = 0, 1/2, 1, 3/2, ... is the spin associated with the link i of the spin network. The two-dimensional area is therefore "concentrated" in the intersections with the spin network.
According to this formula, the lowest possible non-zero eigenvalue of the area operator corresponds to a link that carries spin 1/2 representation. Assuming an Immirzi parameter on the order of 1, this gives the smallest possible measurable area of ~10−66 cm2.
The formula for area eigenvalues becomes somewhat more complicated if the surface is allowed to pass through the vertices, as with anomalous diffusion models. Also, the eigenvalues of the area operator A are constrained by ladder symmetry.
Similar quantization applies to the volume operator. The volume of a 3D submanifold that contains part of a spin network is given by a sum of contributions from each node inside it. One can think that every node in a spin network is an elementary "quantum of volume" and every link is a "quantum of area" surrounding this volume.
More general gauge theories
Similar constructions can be made for general gauge theories with a compact Lie group G and a
Usage in mathematics
In mathematics, spin networks have been used to study
See also
- Spin connection
- Spin structure
- Character variety
- Penrose graphical notation
- Spin foam
- String-net
- Trace diagram
- Tensor network
References
- ^ Proc. Conf., Oxford, 1969), Academic Press, pp. 221–244, esp. p. 241 (the latter paper was presented in 1969 but published in 1971 according to Roger Penrose, "On the Origins of Twistor Theory" (Archived June 23, 2021) in: Gravitation and Geometry, a Volume in Honour of I. Robinson, Biblipolis, Naples 1987).
Further reading
Early papers
- I. B. Levinson, "Sum of Wigner coefficients and their graphical representation," Proceed. Phys-Tech Inst. Acad Sci. Lithuanian SSR 2, 17-30 (1956)
- Kogut, John; Susskind, Leonard (1975). "Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson's lattice gauge theories". Physical Review D. 11 (2): 395–408. .
- Kogut, John B. (1983). "The lattice gauge theory approach to quantum chromodynamics". Reviews of Modern Physics. 55 (3): 775–836. . (see the Euclidean high temperature (strong coupling) section)
- Savit, Robert (1980). "Duality in field theory and statistical systems". Reviews of Modern Physics. 52 (2): 453–487. . (see the sections on Abelian gauge theories)
Modern papers
- Rovelli, Carlo; Smolin, Lee (1995). "Spin networks and quantum gravity". Phys. Rev. D. 52 (10): 5743–5759. S2CID 16116269.
- Pfeiffer, Hendryk; Oeckl, Robert (2002). "The dual of non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory". Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 106–107: 1010–1012. S2CID 14925121.
- Pfeiffer, Hendryk (2003). "Exact duality transformations for sigma models and gauge theories". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 44 (7): 2891–2938. S2CID 15580641.
- Oeckl, Robert (2003). "Generalized lattice gauge theory, spin foams and state sum invariants". Journal of Geometry and Physics. 46 (3–4): 308–354. S2CID 13226932.
- Baez, John C. (1996). "Spin Networks in Gauge Theory". S2CID 17050932.
- Xiao-Gang Wen, "Quantum Field Theory of Many-body Systems – from the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Fermions," [1]. (Dubbed string-nets here.)
- Major, Seth A. (1999). "A spin network primer". American Journal of Physics. 67 (11): 972–980. S2CID 9188101.
Books
- G. E. Stedman, Diagram Techniques in Group Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
- Predrag Cvitanović, Group Theory: Birdtracks, Lie's, and Exceptional Groups, Princeton University Press, 2008.