Talk:Æthelstan A

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Featured articleÆthelstan A is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 10, 2018.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 21, 2014Peer reviewNot reviewed
August 30, 2014Good article nomineeListed
October 22, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Æthelstan A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is it kept?

Could the article describe where it is kept? Anything interesting to say about its surviving those centuries? - DePiep (talk) 22:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have added this to the image caption. You can check the location of charters at [1]. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a thought

Given that this scribe went through all the 'trouble' of making a long list of witnesses, how possible is it that he listed himself?

I know it sounds a bit incredible and that the researchers have probably looked into this possibility; but I know of other instances/cases where the obvious was overlooked.

As I said, just a thought. 2600:8800:785:1300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you are getting at. The possibility that he is one of the witnesses is discussed in the article. Can you clarify? Dudley Miles (talk) 21:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]