Talk:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 1 year

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Joe Biden High‑importance 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries is within the scope of WikiProject Joe Biden, a project dedicated to creating and improving content related to Joe Biden. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Joe BidenWikipedia:WikiProject Joe BidenTemplate:WikiProject Joe BidenJoe Biden articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Politics: American / Political parties Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance). United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as High-importance).

2020 Democratic Party presidential candidates was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 December 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 10,704,305 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 6 times. The weeks in which this happened: February 2 to 8, 2020 February 9 to 15, 2020 February 16 to 22, 2020 February 23 to 29, 2020 March 1 to 7, 2020 March 8 to 14, 2020

Section sizes Section size for 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries (24 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 13,019 13,019 Background 4,049 18,815 Reforms since 2016 9,202 9,202 Rules for number of delegates 38 5,564 Number of pledged delegates per state 3,416 3,416 Candidate threshold 2,110 2,110 Schedule and results 41,078 41,078 Election day postponements and cancellations 16,524 16,524 Candidates 575 72,188 Nominee 4,236 4,236 Withdrew during the primaries 22,684 22,684 Withdrew before the primaries 44,693 44,693 Political positions 117 117 Debates and forums 188 188 Primary election polling 316 316 Timeline 6,695 6,695 Ballot access 45,832 45,832 National convention 2,480 2,480 Endorsements 353 353 Campaign finance 12,560 12,560 Maps 2,356 2,356 See also 582 582 Notes 31 31 References 505 505 Total 233,639 233,639

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Did Gender Keep Democratic Women From Winning The Presidential Primary?

The inclusion of Tulsi Gabbard and Amy Klobuchar in the infobox does not fit in with other primary election pages. Considering neither won a contest, nor got above 5% of the vote, they should not be included. This especially applies to Gabbard, as she got such a small percentage of the vote, and her inclusion also adds an extra row to the infobox which makes it look worse. Candidates such as Ben Carson, Jeb Bush, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, Al Sharpton, Joe Lieberman, and many more all got way higher popular vote percentages and delegate totals despite not being included in infoboxes. Either Tulsi and possibly Klobuchar as well should be removed, or the aforementioned candidates should be added to their respective pages. DragonLegit04 (talk) 02:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I second this opinion. Tulsi did not do anything except get a few lucky delegates in American Samoa. Did not even come close to the 5% to be relevant. Should not be on the list. Trajan1 (talk) 23:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is something that was discussed as the primaries were ongoing, but I believe it is worth re-visiting now. Given that it has been 3 years since the primaries, it's clear that Gabbard was not impactful on the overall results of the elections. Reliable sources are not looking back on the primaries and discussing her impact in any meaningful way. I believe that the criteria for inclusion should be (a) winning a contest, (b) winning 5% of the popular vote, and/or (c) winning 5% of the delegates. (And that means Klobuchar should be removed, too). My understanding is that those three criteria were the long-standing consensus prior to the 2020 primaries, and it was only changed for this article after the results started rolling in.Michelangelo1992 (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both the 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries and the 2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries have maps which represent the popular vote winner by county (or other subdivision) using a color gradient to show the margin of victory. I'm proposing below the following color gradients be used for the candidates in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries to establish a uniform way of creating new maps which represent margins and distinguish candidates. I welcome all suggestions.

TheGreenNate (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My footnote for the NH results was reverted. I believe it should be included in the infobox because it makes the status of NH clearer. Sanders won the popular vote; Buttigieg and Sanders both won nine delegates. (This is consistent with the 2024 primary page, where a footnote is included with Palmer's win at the time of my writing this). My suggestion: "This includes a tie for New Hampshire, in which Sanders and Buttigieg both won 9 pledged delegates". Michelangelo1992 (talk) 01:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]