Talk:Ancestral background of presidents of the United States

This page was proposed for deletion by SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) on 8 August 2020.

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 August 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

Ancestral background of presidents of the United States received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 27 May 2020 by reviewer Modern Major General (talk · contribs). Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Presidents / History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Low-importance). Genealogy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Genetically Ulster Scots are people of Scottish descent, descended from the

We've had some trouble deciding exactly how to detail this in the past, including one proposal pitching that we separate Ulster Scots as a separate group entirely with Irish being for those of Irish Catholic descent only (which would leave only JFK and Reagan). I'm iffy on that proposal even though the current one does not allow one to know who is who unless they look at the references for each, but I understand the current format is not perfect. On the subject of moving Ulster Scots to Scottish I'd have to disagree as while Ulster Scots do have ancestral origins in Scotland, they're considered an ethnic group within Ireland as their move to the country was what made them Ulster Scots to begin with. Once they resided in Northern Ireland they greatly influenced the culture there and are presently accepted as an Irish identity. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 01:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. Yes genetically the Ulster-Scots are perhaps more Scottish, although they are a bit unique, in residing in Ireland, while being partilly loyal to the British, crown which is why they voted to remain apart of the U.K during partition. Moving to the Scottish category is a radical proposal, I am more comfortable with giving them there own, as you said, they are an "ethnic group" in there own right. So i guess this is a discussion about giving them there own category now. Having an near empty column is not rare for this page as the Kenyan category has one. I argue we should give them there own category. Being there own ethnic group, with there own language in Ireland,

That's fair. I can understand the argument you're putting forth in regards to the differences between them, and I don't believe the categories being sparse is any real viable argument against it as yes, Kenyan is just one for the time being, as is Swiss which is similarly limited, but the intention is accuracy and factual information above presentational concerns. Considering as you've swayed me, you're in favor, and the other user you mentioned previously edited it into the article a while back, I'll go about making those changes. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 01:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Glad we came to an agreement! I just think they are too unique to be placed along a group, where as alone would be better. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken B. M. L. Peters (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the difficult issue you are trying to resolve, but there are some inaccuracies in the current list of Ulster-scots presidents. I am only familiar with the irish ancestry of Nixon (ancestors from Kilkenny area), Clinton (ancestors from Fermanagh in Ulster) and Obama (ancestors from Offaly). Nobody who lived in Kilkenny or Offaly would be described as Ulster scots. The classification of the Clinton ancestors would depend on their religion. - Rye 212 (talk) 14:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rye 212: If you can get me the relevant references with regards to those three I can see about hopefully clearing their statuses up. I do believe though, at least according to our references, they all share Ulster-Scots ancestry nevertheless. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John FitzGerald Kennedy, carried a non-Irish family name, in this example that of a noble, 12th century, Anglo-Norman family, recruited to restore the King of Leinster. His ancestors migrated, in the mid 19th century from Ireland, but have a recorded Welsh, English and Norman-French lineage, so is he purely Irish, as the territory his ancestors boarded a boat to the US, or does their ancestory tick a few additional boxes? A.j.roberts (talk) 13:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to this genealogy of Kennedy, he was a descendant of John Fitzgerald (c. 1670-1736), an American colonist in the Colony of Virginia. This ancestor's family background is unknown. I am not certain if there was any connection to the FitzGerald dynasty. Dimadick (talk) 07:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please get rid of the vertical columns and make them horizontal. It's horrible to try to read. Viktory02 (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A sponsored blog post at FindMyPast is used several times in this article as a reference. Is this site considered a reputable source? It seems like shallow self-published research, and doesn't cite its own sources for many of its entries. Further, they seem to contradict other material on Wikipedia. Harding's entry cites several ancestral soures, but the Wikipedia entry for Harding's father says that he was born of Old Stock Americans.

Would there be any objection to removing this source and replacing its invocations with fact tags until more reliable sources became available? -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why on Wikipedia is it possible to say "German" before Germany existed as a state but forbidden to say "British" for anyone born in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland or Wales at any time in history let alone after the creation of the modern United Kingdom? There is no single German ethnic homogenous group. Ditto for the French, Belgians, Swiss, and many others. Sure, you can group people as 'Germanic' going back a long time. But so does 'British' pre-date the modern form of UK a long time. The ancient Greeks knew the concept of Britain and the British. And the Dutch are Germanic. Frantic Wikipedia editors who police this rule apply it to no other nation on earth. 82.21.19.72 (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The attributed ancient Greek understanding of "British" seems to be at variance from that of others such as e.g. the Romans and North Europeans who had more recorded distinction of the different peoples on the island, possibly due to more prolonged contact. MBRZ48

For clarity:

• Scotch-Irish refers to the Ulster Scots, who I will be referencing as "Scotch-Irish".
• "Ancestry" here means blood. If you were born to a Mexican father and Japanese mother, you have Mexican and Japanese ancestry. I use it different from ethnicity, which says that if you were born to the aforementioned parents on Irish soil, you are (first-generation) Irish.

Recently, I saw an edit on a page making the assertion that Irish and Scotch-Irish are essentially similar and should not be delineated as separate categories.

It read like this:

• "Debate: the distinction between Irish and Ulster Scots separate ethno-nationalist groups is a post-Great Irish Famine invention used by Irish-American Protestants to differentiate themselves from Irish Catholics at a time when Irish Catholic immigrants were widely discriminated against in the labour market, housing, and other areas. Prior to the 1840s, the early US presidents listed on this page as Ulster-Scots would not have described themselves as such And would likely in fact have considered themselves Irish and/or British. This table should not therefore identify the two as separate categories."

The section had no citations, so I removed it, and then did some cursory digging into the history of the Scotch-Irish. They're not Irish, they're, surprise, Scots who moved to Ireland, particularly Ulster. Some moved to the United States.

Now, at first, I'd thought this was fine. But I thought about it and realized I didn't understand this a whole lot. The Scotch-Irish share a culture--they are an ethnic group, to be sure--but, if they're ancestrally just one part of the overall Scottish diaspora, then does the page need to specifically mention presidents with Scotch-Irish ancestry? Andrew Jackson's dad, for example, lived in Ireland, but he's still of Scottish ancestry, and was essentially a first-generation immigrant to Ireland anyways. I'm not saying the Scotch-Irish are not an ethnic group, but that it is no special distinction on this page.

For reference, imagine listing a hypothetical future US president's ancestry as Korean, then Sakhalin Korean. Koreans in Russia share a lot of culture, but is it a specific distinction to make on a page like this? (Especially if, for example, in the case of Andrew Jackson, he has no ancestors of Irish blood.)

Importantly, though, I'm not saying to remove the distinction, I'd rather talk about it first. Fringe, Suspect The (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article says that Ike may not have had British ancestry. He did. Please note this Findagrave reference: Daniel Stover Jr. (1780-1865) - Find a Grave Memorial. Follow under Simon Peter Stover and you will see Ida Stover Eisenhower listed. Daniel Jr. was married to a Hannah--definitely a British name. I am a genealogist related to Ike. My grandmother Nettie Stover Jackson was his first cousin. I have Ike's Stover background traced back into the 1300s and 1400s. I do not fee comfortable editing the document, so, if you find what I have said acceptable, I would hope that the change would be made. Thank you. Stpauljackson5 (talk) 20:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]