Talk:Anett Kontaveit

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). Estonia Mid‑importance Anett Kontaveit is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles) Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it Maintain : Portal:Estonia Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia) Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class. Tennis Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tennis To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Open Era ATP and WTA tournament. Women's sport: Tennis Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Women's tennis task force (assessed as Low-importance).

There really is no need to document the result of every single tournament a player plays like on Elise Mertens page. Especially for players like these who are not going deep on every tournament. Eventually these tables will get too big and messy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeneM18 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is that "SR"? --Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strike Rate (tournaments won/tournaments competed) check Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis for such questions. -Klõps (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The artice should atleast explain what does it mean. But in this case it does not look necessary when it's just a row of zeros. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Since "strike rate" is not a common term, it has now been added to the required key. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support adding this. Looks like so are JamesAndersoon (talk · contribs) and GeneM18 (talk · contribs). But Klõps (talk · contribs) is against, any more opinions? I'm not sure if it should start from 2013 though. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pelmeen10 (talk · contribs) thank you for your support. I don't see any problem with showing performance of any player on some tournaments, especially when a lot of players have these "Performance timelines table". Anett Kontaveit is rising star in tennis, and for me is really interesting to see how she is progressing in tennis. For example, last two years she made at least quarterfinal at Rome, Italy, she is seeded player on grand slams, she has triumph against big names and etc. So far, it's bit trivial cuz she is still young, but there are a lot of other player's statistics that have more absents in tables than Anett. For me, it's meaningless to have fight against Klõps (talk · contribs), but it's ok if you think it's trivial, but for some others users it's intresting to see. I made Anett Kontaveit career statistics so there will be detailed carrer of Anett, and on main page only Grand Slam performance.

Pelmeen10 (talk · contribs) Talking about before 2013, I didn't find that Anett participated at any of Grand Slam or Premier 5/Mandatory tournament, so I think it's pointless to make statictics before 2013.

I think when a player makes multiple quarterfinals at tier 1 events there should not be any problem in adding those events to the Preformance table. The year should start from the first year they participated in either a slam or tier 1 event GeneM18 (talk) 19:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These belong to career statistics article. No need to add long tables full of mistakes (as it was!). and other people have to clean up and fix it after you. --Klõps (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per Tennis project, having a Grand Slam tournament performance timeline on the main page is standard for all players who have played in one. Having additional tournaments in the timeline is fine but not if the player also has a career statistics article. Those additional tournaments would then be placed in the career statistics article only and the main page would only list the Grand Slam tournaments. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fyunck(click) (talk · contribs) Yes, I agree with everything you said. That's why I made Anett Kontaveit career statistics. I really hope so that we all made a deal :D – JamesAndersoon (talk)

This article says "turned pro: 2010", but her statistics' page "professional debut in 2012". So which is it? I don't how is that decided, according to wtatennis.com she played her first ITF event in 2010 and first WTA qualif in 2012. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 21:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It can be pretty ambiguous that's for sure. You can play pro events but not take the prize money and therefore stay amateur. It does look like she was playing pro events in 2010 though and I found some sources that confirm that. I would say 2012 is incorrect. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote that she debut in 2012 but someone change it to 2010. But actually she debut in 2013 at Miami Open. On official wta site ["WTA TENNIS], in 2010, 2011,2012 she played only ITF tournaments. On professional level, she debut in 2013 (She played some professional tournaments in 2012 but in qualifications, so I think that's didn't count, cuz she didn't qualify for main draw. – JamesAndersoon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's the confusion. The ITF is professional tennis. It may be the minor leagues for lesser players, but it is still a paying professional sport. Fyunck(click) (talk) 16:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh. Sorry, my mistake. I thought it's categorised as amateur tournaments, and WTA Tour is professional. Thank you Fyunck(click) (talk · contribs) – JamesAndersoon (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem... I can see why there would be confusion on that. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]