Talk:Avengers: Endgame/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

here's the source Npamusic (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Potentially January 23, 2017. See here. The source seems a bit questionable to me, but the date does seem plausible. As always, something to keep our eye on. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

1. Move to the mainspace! This can happen in two ways: contact an admin to perform the move (which requires the deletion of
   CUT AND PASTE
   ! (We can ping Czar here when we are ready for the move).  Done
   1. If the moving admin does not do this, be sure to remove {{Draft article}} and unhide the categories.  Done
2. Change the template at List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films#Untitled Avengers sequel (2019) from {{further}} to {{main}} including both this article and the production article. Update the table on the List of films article to link directly to the new article and that its status is "Filming".
   1. Update the templates at The Avengers (2012 film)#Avengers: Infinity War and its sequel, Avengers: Age of Ultron#Sequels and Avengers (comics) in other media#Live action to only include the new film article, not the production article. That doesn't seem immediately appropriate to link from these sections, at least in the hat templates.  Done
3. Add the logo image to the infobox (File:Avengers Infinity War logo.jpg) unless a new one is revealed, in which case, upload that and use it.  Done
4. Fix redirects currently going to Production of Avengers: Infinity War and the untitled Avengers sequel to the new mainspace article. Okay so there are a lot of redirects, so I'm not going to list them all.  Done
   1. We'll also have to make sure things are not piped as [[Production of Avengers: Infinity War and the untitled Avengers sequel|untitled Avengers sequel]], etc. I think once the name change was revealed I handled instances of the first film going to its redirect, with this issue mainly for this film.  Done
5. Add the article link to all the nav boxes used in the article.  Done
6. If Marvel provides us with a press release indicating filming starting, add any info from that to our respective pages (castings mainly).
   1. Yeah this would be a blessing. I think if and when we do get a press release (hopefully) listing all the cast members, that one source can be used in the small production info we have on this article.

As always, let me know if there are any questions or concerns. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

@

Czar: This one too. - Favre1fan93 (talk

) 06:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

done and by the way, you can leave the WikiProject banner quality/importance blank and it'll automatically categorize as "draft" in draftspace and as needing assessment when mainspaced czar 06:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

@

Well, an unscientific google search returns twice the amount of hits for "Untitled Avengers sequel". Scratch that. "Untitled Avengers film" returns 3,600 hits, "Untitled Avengers sequel" returns 6,500 hits and "Untitled Avengers movie" returns 23,000 hits. If based solely on that, I'd say "Untitled Avengers film" since we generally refer to films, not movies.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Either would be fine, I think. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

If we use "film", should the production article be renamed, as well as the section at the List of films article and any template use, etc.? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 07:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

I think the current title has a better ring to it than "Production of Avengers: Infinity War and the untitled Avengers film." It also has some continuity to it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Maybe keep the article title (which I agree, is better as is since it is talking about both films together) and other instances, such as the LoF heading, becomes "film". Only reason I'm asking, is I'm going to try and take care of links that go to the production article that should go to this article, to be easier once the move happens. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

See here. I've created a redirect article for

Earlier today, Zoe Saldana revealed the title for the Avengers Infinity War sequel and i made some changes here Untitled Avengers film but i don't know how to rename the article to make is Infinity Gauntlet, could someone please change it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidan The Editor (talk • contribs) 00:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

See above, it was an off the cuff remark not anything to be seriously at this point. Besides she said "Guantlet" not "Avengers: Infinity Guantlet". Wait till there's an actual confirmation and we'll discuss a move here.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

If Avengers 4 starts filming in August and wraps in October or November, then they should wrap in December or January instead because Infinity War will last till June or July, that's 6 or 7 months of filming Infinity War and it's not fair for Avengers 4 to wrap in 3 or 4 months from August to October or November. I think Avengers 4 should start in mid-late July and wrap in December or January. What do you guys think? - EgyptianGamer

These questions are better asked to Marvel Studios, or its president. --Kailash29792 (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

I guess we'll wait till August 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by EgyptianGamer (talk • contribs) 13:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Why is this if it's mentioned in his filmography page? 2605:E000:AB28:1500:F9C2:D19F:6351:7F7E (talk) 07:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

His article is wrong. He has not been confirmed for these films. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

He's been confirmed for Avengers 3 as of now. - EgyptianGamer

Dave Bautista confirms Drax is back in Avengers 4: https://mobile.twitter.com/DaveBautista/status/887105918625775616

 Done - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Scarlett Johansson is confirmed for Avangers Infinity War part 2 Scarlettjo68 (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

you should add her at cast Scarlettjo68 (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Please cite a reliable source.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

She was confirmed in the cast and spotted on set according to an article by cinema blend Jimpat514 (talk) 15:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

No

reliable source has been provided in order to add her to the list. If you can find one, feel free to add it. - DinoSlider (talk

) 16:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

For clarification (if anyone needed it), here are set photos of the untitled film shoot, with Downey and Paltrow in the same outfits they were in with the image Downey posted, eliminating the possibility of it being an old photo from the Infinity War shoot posted now, despite Downey using "#infinitywar". - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

https://theplaylist.net/sebastian-stan-marvel-tonya-interview-20170911/2/#cb-content

"I’ve got to ask you about “Avengers: Infinity War.” I’m guessing you’ve finished shooting that?

That’s done, yes.

Do you know what you’re doing next?

I know I’m going back there now in October, supposedly continuing the war. I have no idea. I haven’t read the script.

Oh, for the second “Avengers” movie.

Yeah." — Preceding unsigned comment added by RottenRaccoon (talk • contribs) 10:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

 Added - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Atlanta Filming on it's Twitter page has confirmed in tow separate tweets that Brie Larson as Captain Marvel will be in Avengers 4:

https://twitter.com/AtlantaFilming/status/909776343960875010 https://twitter.com/AtlantaFilming/status/909778106029953025 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.22.19.82 (talk) 11:26, September 18, 2017 (UTC)

The twiiter account is unverified and therefore unreliable.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Will this source come down? https://www.comicbookmovie.com/avengers/avengers_infinity_war/it-appears-as-if-brie-larsons-captain-marvel-has-been-confirmed-for-avengers-4-a153895 --KeymixGame (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

If they feel it needs to. CBM always write up articles cantered around speculation so it's no surprise they wrote this one up. Rusted AutoParts 15:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Information gradually began to fly http://screenrant.com/avengers-4-brie-larson-captain-marvel-filming/ --KeymixGame (talk) 15:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Websites want clicks. Twitter account is unverified so it's not reliable with screenrant either.

Also isn't that the same twitter account that claimed they saw Scarlett Johansson on the Spider-Man Homecoming set? Yet she was never in the movie. Rusted AutoParts 16:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Please see

WP:FRUIT which undoubtably all of these sources reporting on this will be. - Favre1fan93 (talk

) 17:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

I believe we finally have our source.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:24, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

https://mobile.twitter.com/JustJared/status/909846094003232768

Since Wikipedia won't let me post the Just Jared link, I have to link u to the Just Jared story through this tweet.

Even if Just Jared could be used (it can't), the images are only of them at an airport. That doesn't mean anything, unless you want to

make your own assumptions based on that. - Favre1fan93 (talk

) 17:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Don cheadle confirmed by Paltrow in a interview SrVerde (talk) 20:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Added - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

http://screenrant.com/avengers-4-set-photos-new-hawkeye-look/ This article contains link to set photos where not only Hawkeye has a new style, but Paul Rudd is also seen. However, since the only source is a bunch of set photos, what will we do about it? Do we use another article about it as a source or do we wait for another type of source? CAJH (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

I think using Screen Rant to source Rudd's inclusion is fine. But we can't use it for the supposed new look of Hawkeye. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

It's ok. I don't think that look is important enough to mention anyways. After all, Rogers' beard and Romanoff's blonde hair were never written in Infinity War article either. CAJH (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Can we use this source now? It's better confirmation for Black Widow & Ant-Man? https://screenrant.com/robert-downey-jr-avengers-4/ - EgyptianMarvelSWFan (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Replaced. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Several sources report that Ty Simpkins reprises his Role from Iron Man 3.

http://www.filmstarts.de/nachrichten/18515226.html

http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/the-avengers/news/a841248/avengers-4-ty-simpkins-iron-man-3-harley-keener-return/

http://www.premiere.fr/Cinema/News-Cinema/Avengers-4-fera-revenir-Ty-Simpkins-le-gamin-d-Iron-Man-3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:638:1558:E800:9192:915B:A8A1:AFC0 (talk) 10:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

WP:FRUIT. Sources trace back to IMDb, which is unreliable. - Favre1fan93 (talk

) 18:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Kevin Feige confirmed to Indie Wire that Brie Larson will appear as Captain Marvel in Avengers 4: http://www.indiewire.com/2017/10/female-superhero-mcu-post-phase-three-1201889036/

He actually didn't. He said, "Really, the focus now is on delivering Captain Marvel and then bringing Captain Marvel’s story into the finale of everything we’ve started thus far."--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Feige didn't state this himself, but the article says that Larson will appear in Avengers 4: “Captain Marvel” doesn’t start shooting until March, but Larson will appear in that untitled fourth “Avengers” film" Richiekim (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

That is based on Feige's comments which only mentions her story being in the finale. This seems to be another case of WP:Verifiability, not truth.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

But he says this "Captain Marvel doesn’t start shooting until March, but Larson will appear in that untitled fourth “Avengers” film." Read the source properly! BTW this is EgyptianGamer. EgyptianMarvelSWFan (talk) 6:19, 25 October 2017 (PT)

He never said that. See the above response.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Is this reliable to confirm Black Panther and Shuri for Avengers 4? https://screenrant.com/avengers-4-set-photos-black-panther-shuri/ Looks both reliable and unreliable in my opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EgyptianMarvelSWFan (talk • contribs) 08:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

No, the source is an unverified twitter account.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Damn! Wait for a better confirmation.

This source should be added for extra confirmation for Thanos in Avengers 4, can someone add it please? https://screenrant.com/avengers-4-thanos-return-josh-brolin-announcement/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by EgyptianMarvelSWFan (talk • contribs) 12:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

The movie is filming scenes settled in the 1940's, as flashback maybe with Chris Evans. ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.35.29.153 (talk) 22:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Now can we add Brie Larson as Captain Marvel to the wiki page of Avengers 4? Because Scarlett Johannson has confirmed, via Vanity Fair, that she'll be in Avengers 4: https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/11/the-future-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe-robocop

It has been added. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add these! https://screenrant.com/avengers-4-filming-wrap-january/ https://screenrant.com/loki-aligns-with-thanos-avengers-infinity-war/ Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EgyptianMarvelSWFan (talk • contribs) 12:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Can we add this? Stan talks about the film wrapping in mid-Jan. Should we add it? https://screenrant.com/avengers-4-filming-wrap-january/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by EgyptianMarvelSWFan (talk • contribs) 05:06, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

This edit request to Untitled Avengers film has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Chadwick Boseman should be added to cast list:

• Wakanda
  , who gained his enhanced strength by ingesting the Heart-Shaped Herb.

Source: http://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/new-avengers-4-set-pics-feature-black-panther/#gallery-3 Austin2179 (talk) 18:43, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

 Added with similar, more reliable source. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Ty simpkins added in cast Asj052 (talk) 10:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Withholding title backfired http://www.ign.com/articles/2018/04/23/marvel-studios-kevin-feige-on-why-the-decision-to-withhold-avengers-4-title-backfired --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Bustle exclusive [1] --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

This Avengers: Infinity War Part 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

47.63.114.92 (talk) 13:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a

reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart

14:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Many of the cast citations are simply references to the actors agreeing to a certain number of movies or confirming for Avengers: Infinity War back when it was going to be a Part I/Part II deal and it's assumed they'd appear in both. These need to be examined and re-confirmed or new sources need to be found that don't make those assumptions. I don't follow entertainment news very closely, so I'm not sure where to go for reliable sources. GaidinBDJ (talk) 03:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Why was it removed? A First party source is the best what we can have. Then we know, that's the truth. What's wrong with this. Source for this information: http://resumes.breakdownexpress.com/419841-1585104 --Maintrance (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

We should avoid

in no rush. Actors can also add roles to resumes that may ultimately not make it to the final version of the film. - Favre1fan93 (talk

) 03:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

"Breakdown Express" is the "Casting Service Agency", they should know, what for roles their actress/actors got in casting processes for the movie. Fuhrmann herselve is not the author. --Maintrance (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Even though they may not make it into the final cut of the film, this doesn't negate the fact that the actor is currently cast in this film...--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 02:16, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Then we need an RS to support that claim. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Am I reading this right? Is this section just speculation from a blog post on how Marvel might market the movie? Capnpitz (talk) 03:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

It is critical commentary, and includes comments from the studios involved. - adamstom97 (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Greetings. Based on human logic, we should erase, until further notice, certain names of the cast. I do not know why it is based on INFINITY War BILLING BLOCK. I know they left us a mess. But we must not speculate, for now, we must guide ourselves in the facts. Am I authorized? At the moment I have located 11 names. --Berposen (talk) 23:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

The cast is based on who has been confirmed to return, ordered based on the Infinity War billing. Removing cast members based on what happened in a different film would be speculation itself. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

The included citation for Hiddleston's casting in Avengers 4 is is from back when Avengers 4 was "Avengers: Infinity War Part 2", and I read or misread it as if it shorthands "Avengers: Infinity War Part 2" as "Avengers 2". There are better (current) sources out there and I've selected one (although it seems still not a great one). Can we update that citation to a current citation that relates to the two movies that are no longer "Infinity War Parts 1 & 2"? -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

I don't see the need. The source, clear as day, states: He will also play a part in Avengers: Infinity Part 1 and Part 2. Sources stating IW Part 2 still apply to this article, even though they are no longer titled by that. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:32, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

This edit request to Untitled Avengers film has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

82.16.65.11 (talk) 17:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

add a plot and make some cast changes

Films not out yet, what plot is there to add? And what cast changes do you mean? Rusted AutoParts 17:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a

reliable source if appropriate. Sam Sailor

21:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Should we add these three in here? I remember Sebastian Stan stating they were involved in the two parter, and considering the first is now out and they weren’t in it it demonstrates they’ll be in this one, no? Rusted AutoParts 17:40, 27 May 2018 (UTC)]

I EgyptianMarvelSWFan vote maybe yes. And what about Jackson and Hurt??

Please add as multiple sources are confirming this or it's not reliable? Let me know, thanks. Also add it for Spider-Man 2 filming end as it says filming ends till December. https://screenrant.com/avengers-4-reshoots-spider-man-homecoming-2-filming/ - EgyptianMarvelSWFan — Preceding unsigned comment added by EgyptianMarvelSWFan (talk • contribs) 15:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

The Cast section is currently using the Cast list from Part One without noting the "killed" cast members in Part One. My edit has indicated that the Cast section should include a short notice that some of the Cast members were killed and may not be appearing in Part Two. User:Triiiple is reverting even though the first paragraph of the current plot summary of Infinity Wars is stating that Loki is "killed". FutureForecasts (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

That’s not the way this works. You made a bold edit, it was reverted, and now you’re expected to discuss, not revert the revert. The film is a work of fiction, there are many ways the character can reappear if he/she was “killed” in a previous film.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Requesting comments from other editors. Should some edit be made to recognize that some of the killed cast members from Part One may not be returning for Part Two? FutureForecasts (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Especially given the nature of the story, I don't think we should be making any assumptions about cast members based on the plot of the previous film. Let's wait for reliable sources.

Nitpicking polish (talk

) 20:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

I have already responded to this same discussion at Talk:Production of Avengers: Infinity War and the untitled Avengers sequel. I suggest we stick to just one. Either way, we should go by reliable sources not the guesses of editors who think they know what will happen in one film based on watching a different one. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

If sources explicitly state that they are in part two then we follow the sources, with no comment on if they are being brought back from their deaths. In the case of sources being ambiguous or speculative we should just leave them out for the time being. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

There is currently no reliable source to tell us that anyone of the killed cast in Part One is returning/reviving/resurrecting for Part Two which I could find published after the release of Part One. None. Since this is a Part One going into Part Two sequence of films, then the fact that Part One includes death scenes of killed cast members is a reliable source for their deaths as is currently shown in the Infinity War plot summary on Wikipedia. If anyone has a reliable source from after the release of Part One for killed cast members from Part One returning for roles in Part Two then let us see it. Otherwise it is original research to claim that they are returning in Part Two. The article should indicate which cast members were killed in Part One, Loki's death and the others. FutureForecasts (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

No, it is original research to decide ourselves which reliable sources to ignore based on the fictional events depicted in a film. If there is no new source saying the old ones were intentionally misleading to hide the events of this film, then we don't get to make that decision. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:18, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

We get many reliable sources during the filming part of a production for who has been cast and is appearing. For this film, that happened to be concurrent with Infinity War. Going by on screen deaths is hardly a way to make decisions, especially in this case. Not to mention that what happens plot wise in Infinity War is irrelevant here because there are many narrative options available to allow characters who have "died" to reappear (see flashbacks, dream sequences, alternate realities, etc.). And based on that, if that does happen, we note that for the character in the plot section most likely. All in all, none of the edits that were attempted to add should have been. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Outside reviewers of the film have indicated regret for the death of Loki since he represented such a cult following in the various previous franchise films. So many reviewers have also made the point that these two films (Part One leading into Part Two) are not two random entry points in the Marvel universe but that they are sequenced for release as a Part One followed by a pre-announced Part Two. Therefor some mention should occur somewhere in this article of these deaths since the death of Loki and other killed cast members is already mentioned in the film article for Infinity War. Their deaths should be mentioned somewhere in this article. FutureForecasts (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps add something like "He died in the aftermath of Infinity War"? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

How do you know that his appearance here leads on from his role in Infinity War? You are still making guesses based on a different film from this one. If we get a source saying that Loki will appear as some sort of phantom, then it might make sense to clarify that he has previously been killed off. Or if we start explaining how characters are brought back to life, it will of course make sense to explain that they were killed first. But until we get something like that, we can only go off what we have been told and not what our best guess of the future is. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

If Emir is stating that it is best to keep this edit as short as possible in this article then I am agreeing with him. Also, there is nothing in the new teaser trailers for Costume Upgrades for Part Two published now in June to suggest that any of the killed cast from Part One will be returning for Part Two as published here: [2]. The killed cast members in Part One need to be identified in this article concerning what is stated about the returning cast of Part Two. FutureForecasts (talk) 16:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Again, no they don't. Who is or isn't "killed" in the previous film is a plot detail, not even related to this film. Character descriptions do not include plot info, only the basics descriptions for the character. However, if we have statements from either the actor, writers, directors, or producers discussing the "death" in the previous film in regards to this film, then something can be included. But we don't have anything like that at this time for any of the "dead" characters, and we don't just make that statement for the need of identifying that. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Another editor, Shayan, yesterday is also noting this issue in his edit yesterday in the article. Multiple editors are now noticing this issue about the killed cast members from Part One. The directors of this film are serious filmmakers and it seems odd to think that the killed cast members died in Part One as random thoughts by these directors. Could I suggest that it makes sense to add something to the current description of Loki here in the article which now states: "Thor's adoptive brother." It can be left this way with a phrase added to state that "Loki was portrayed as being killed in Part One". FutureForecasts (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I feel like you are not hearing anything we are saying. We are not a fan wikia. Not only is who did or didn't "die" plot info from another film, it does not automatically make any of those actors/characters unable to appear in some form in this film. If reliable sources come out before the film releases stating one of these methods of return, we can include it. Additionally, yes these two films were once a "part 1/part 2" situation, but not as much any more, yet another reason not to note this. And as I said in my previous comment, we can add such a statement if we have context for it with comments from the actor or filmmakers. Other than that, we are just pandering to trivial info, which isn't the purpose of Wikipedia. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

This edit request to Untitled Avengers film has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

• Paul Rudd as Scott Lang / Ant-Man: A former petty criminal who acquired a suit that allows him to shrink or grow in scale but increase in strength.^[1]

"but increase in strength." should be "and increase in strength." IsyRivers (talk) 15:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done L293D (☎ • ✎) 00:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

The premise section reads like it was written by a marketing agency or a fanboy. It seems like an ad - "will draw audiences" "our beloved heroes". It's very inappropriate for Wikipedia. 178.250.162.242 (talk) 07:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Isn't one of these sources good? http://comicbook.com/marvel/2018/05/22/avengers-4-synopsis-released/ https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/avengers-4-synopsis-sacrifice-tease-iron-man-captain-america-dead-a8365491.html Let me know as I think I'm gonna wait for a better one later in the year. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EgyptianMarvelSWFan (talk • contribs) 11:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

The source isn’t the problem, it’s just too vague to be useful. We’re better off just waiting for a better one.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Karen Gillan should be credited as part of the main cast as she is one of the surviving characters. And she plays a vital role in the comics Infinity1822 (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Karen Gillan Should be credited as part of the main cast as Nebula is one of the surviving members after Infinity War and her character plays a vital role in the comics Infinity1822 (talk) 21:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Please provide a source. We don't engage in

WP:SPECULATION based off the comics. Emir of Wikipedia (talk

) 21:55, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

And please drop the all-caps in edit summaries. Drmies (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Where's Michael Douglas on Untitled Avengers film? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.255.217.165 (talk) 22:33, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

A couple of days ago, I was on the DC Extended Universe Wikipedia page and I was reading in the talk that there had been requests to change it to Worlds of DC or Untitled DC Cinematic Universe. Untitled Avengers Film has the same problem. On Wikipedia it is referred to as UAF but everywhere else calls it Avengers 4. DCEU keeps it's name on the page because it is the most common term for it which is the same as Avengers 4. I search up news about the movie each day and every single webpage I go onto calls it Avengers 4 because it is the most common term for the film. I think we should rename it Avengers 4 until the official title comes out along with the trailer in November/December. Because, people are going to search up Avengers 4, not Untitled Avengers Film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mystic Moore (talk • contribs) 03:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please see the previous discussions on this at #Requested move 1 June 2018 and #Requested move 31 July 2018 above. - adamstom97 (talk) 04:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

This edit request to Untitled Avengers film has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the name of the Article from "Untitled Avengers film" to "Avengers 4: Annihilation" as the trailer for the film has been released and has shown the title of the film as well. Purvanshtrivedi (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Please provide a reliable source.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 09:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Those are all lies its still Untitled Avengers Movie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph.ludwig (talk • contribs) 15:40, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Tilda Swinton will play The Ancient One in Avengers 4, confirmded Frank Grillo. https://comicbook.com/marvel/2018/10/26/avengers-4-major-marvel-character-returns-ancient-one/

WP:FRUIT. - Favre1fan93 (talk

) 17:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Why aren't we addressing this in the cast list? I think leaving them there without mentioning their fate in the last films is a little bit jarring to say the least. - Jasonbres (talk) 15:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

We don't know what their roles in this film will be, only that they are in it. - adamstom97 (talk) 18:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

This article currently states that "exclusive glimpses from [Untitled Avengers]" were shown at CineEurope, "including a scene featuring Tony Stark and Scott Lang". This is not true^[1], and in fact Disney confirmed to MCU Cosmic that only clips with Kevin Feige were shown^[2]. Minindo (talk) 08:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Edit: This is now fixed. Thanks, fellow Wikipedian. Minindo (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

I Can Add Hugh Jackman And Samuel L. Jackson If Someone Lifts The Page Protection PLEASE!!! Coolguy3478 (talk) 04:54, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

 Not done This is exactly why we have page protection here, to stop people like you from adding whatever the hell you want. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

It has been confirmed by Avengers 4 executive producer Michael Grillo that “when we got Tilda Swinton, she was just a 1-day availability” while shooting the film.^[1] This statement was made at the Austin Film Festival, and is corroborated by an interview done by Mark Ruffalo in which he claimed to have enjoyed filming with Tilda Swinton on the film.^[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by B91302 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

We don't actually know if she's in the film. It's clear she did do filming for the film, but her role would most likely be short if she was only available for a day so her scenes may of been cut. Also we do not yet have confirmation from Marvel about her role in Avengers 4. So until we see her in marketing, get an announcement or see her in the film, I don't feel she should be added yet. Mystic Moore (talk) 11:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Lift The Page Protection And I Can Do It

Coolguy3478 (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Why would a producer mention Swinton filming her part only to have it be cut and disappoint the fans? I of course can understand the reluctancy regarding the situation as we know very little about the film.

B91302 (talk) 03:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

I think the movie's title is Annihilation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:6199:1E00:616C:6973:62FC:F5A4 (talk) 02:44, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable source or a concrete proposal for a change to this article? I've seen that rumour too, but I think it's probably too early for us to say. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Assuming, of course, you mean "Annihilation". Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

When the trailer comes out we will know whether you are right or wrong. Ludwigjoey (talk) 22:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Trailer is out. He was dead wrong. Armegon (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

This edit request to Avengers: Endgame has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the Avenger's Endgame image to a larger one. The Insignificant Philosopher (talk) 13:32, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: For copyright reasons, the image must be a scaled-down low-resolution image. See

WP:NFC. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?

) 13:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 December 2018

This edit request to Avengers: Endgame has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I want to change the names of the cast members, like Clint Barton will be Clint Barton/Ronin. TheLastJedi33 (talk) 15:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Please provide a

reliable source. - Favre1fan93 (talk

) 15:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Is this too early to include? JOEBRO64 18:07, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes. That's speculation at this point. Let's wait for the film and check its actual box office. Cambalachero (talk) 19:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

The article cites Comicbook.com[3] for score information for Infinity War and Endgame. However, that announcement was made in June 2016 and the Infinity War score was released in April 2018[4], per the source cited in the soundtrack article. Now that we know that Alan Silvestri did, in fact, score the film, we should say that, instead of the less precise claim that he had been hired to do it. A pertinent example is James Gunn being hired to direct the sequel to Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 - it's a fact, but it would be misleading to place it front and centre in the article without clarifying that he has now been fired. Airbornemihir (talk) 23:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

The version of the article that you want does not make sense. In June 2016, Silvestri had not even started working on the Infinity War score. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

@Adamstom.97: that's a valid concern. Would it work to cite a more recent source, such as TechAdvisor [5] earlier this month? Airbornemihir (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

But I don't see why we need to change it. We definitely should be citing the initial announcement, and at that time he was announcing that he would return for both Infinity War and Endgame. The only way we could use an updated source is to add something along the lines of "He did go on to compose the Infinity War score" which seems a bit janky to me, and unnecessary since I think most readers are going to make the assumption unless we say otherwise. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:42, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

@

bludgeon territory (although there are only two people in this discussion) so I'll just note it seems janky to me, in a similar way, for the "Music" section to keep looking like it hasn't been updated since June 2016. I guess this is somewhat subjective, so I'm not going to push it further. Cheers, Airbornemihir (talk

) 01:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

To be clear, I agree that it looks like it has not been updated since June 2016, but I do not think that will be an issue once we have some more content in the section which will likely refer to his completed work on Infinity War. So I think

WP:NORUSH applies here. - adamstom97 (talk

) 01:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Change of date release date in introduction

This edit request to Avengers: Endgame has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

It says in introduction the following: "The film is scheduled to be released in the United States on April 26, 2019, in IMAX and 3D." This is not true. The film is scheduled to release in the United Kingdom on April 26, 2019, while it is releasing in the United States on May 3, 2019. I would like it to be edited to say the correct date(s). TheGreatGameLord (talk) 14:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

The poster and trailer confirmed that it has been moved up like Infinity War last year. -- Zoo (talk) 14:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps the extended page protection should be reduced as well. Roadsguy (talk) 01:58, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

The protection level is definitely helping with the vandalism. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

I just meant reduce it so that it ends on the April 26 when it comes out instead of the original release date of May 3. Roadsguy (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

This edit request to Avengers: Endgame has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the Marketing section, before the sentence, "The first trailer for the film was released on December 7, 2018," This line should be added:

"The trailer was originally scheduled to be released on December 5, 2018, but was postponed for the funeral of former 
President George H. W. Bush.[1][2][3]
 The first trailer for the film was released on December 7, 2018. 

Thank you, sincerely HAL333 HAL333 (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Have you got a source? Matt14451 (talk) 22:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide

reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Jonesey95 (talk

) 01:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Those were rumours and were reported as such. Marvel has not commented on why they released the trailer the day they did. Reach Out to the Truth 05:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

What is the necessity of this phrase? What does it have to do with

Yes. Things can still change between now and release. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

That's an absurd application of the rule. By this logic we should also write that it is intended to be released by Disney, or that it is intended to be in the superhero genre.

talk

) 18:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't think it's feasible to argue that this could end up being an indirect sequel. Is this lack of certainty coming from a source? Argento Surfer (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

I agree with

Popcornduff that "intended to be" is unnecessary. It should be dropped. Keep the language simple. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me}

) 19:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

My God, how I long to keep the language simple...

talk

) 20:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Like Favre said, anything can happen. The film is uncompleted and unreleased. The wording should reflect that this is a future event and circumstances may change.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

So the whole article should be written as a hypothetical then? Do sources support the lack of certainty about it's status as a direct sequel to Avengers 3? Argento Surfer (talk) 20:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, sources support the fact that it has not been released. The film is not beyond being shelved, scrapped, etc.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

I think you know what I was asking for, but please, provide a reliable source that indicates this multi-million dollar production might be scrapped. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Likewise, I think you know its not about being a direct or indirect sequel, but more about if it will even be the next in a line of a sequence of films.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I never said it will be, but it is not out of the realm of possibility. Stranger things have happened. Point being we do not write about future events as if they have already occurred.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:00, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

So it's intended to be distributed by Disney then? Argento Surfer (talk) 21:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes. Perhaps, we should change the current wording to reflect that.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Done, but I bet it doesn't stick. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

The word "intended" can be removed entirely. If it was in development hell or the script was getting shopped around, more cautious language would be needed. If there were an actual dispute, such as any sources who actually said "Well, Disney calls it a sequel but it's really a soft reboot" and someone else says, "No, it's a hard reboot, no it's an homage based on the franchise..." But nobody is saying that. Nobody disputes what film they are making or what it is going to be. The only bit of crystal ball reduction we have here is that it's not in the can yet. Readers should be adequately cautioned that we'll see it when we see it and until we see it, nothing about the final release is a fact. It is a fact that they are making the direct sequel Infinity War, it's a fact that they are making Marvel's 22nd film (exhausting! it has to be said) and it's a fact that they're making a movie based on the Avengers comics. We know with sufficient confidence they are working on that, and not working on a musical comedy set in medieval Spain. It's sufficient to just be clear that it's not done yet. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

I would say that it's certain beyond reasonable doubt that this will be released by Disney, etc etc. Of course, there could be a meteor strike that kills all of humanity between today and the release date or something, but I would say that a simpler wording is fine. Juxlos (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Is "set to be distributed" not a less wonky way of phrasing this? "Intended" just doesn't sound right in this context.

talk

) 22:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Is there even anyone outside the groupthink involved with this set of articles that even supports "intended to be" here? Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 00:55, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

The problem with this groupthink is that the articles suffer a cookie-cutter approach where everything is exactly the same, to a fault. Here's Google showing similar articles with "intended to be": results. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 01:00, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

What is the fault? It is accurate. For the record, “intended”/“set”/“scheduled” makes no difference to me but we should avoid the finality and prophetizing of “is”, and “will be”. —TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

"Intended" is a loaded word that casts doubt where there is no serious (serious = non-

in text attribution for who is telling us what they will do. Any doubt as to the reliability or the veracity of their intentions must be based on sources, not a knee-jerk skepticism invented out of whole cloth by a Wikipedia editor. That is enough of a disclaimer. No loaded terms like "intended"need to be piled on, out, -- what? -- a apparent lack of respect for the reader's intelligence? --Dennis Bratland (talk

) 02:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

I think this stems in WP:FILM's traditional habit of saying for films' release dates that it is "scheduled/set/intended" to be released on a given date. In general, it makes sense if the date years or months out because dates can change. When the release date is a lot closer, then that qualifier becomes less and less necessary (though I have no idea where the threshold could be). But that qualifier seems to be leaking to other, more definite characteristics of films. For Wonder Woman 1984, it "is intended to be the sequel to 2017's Wonder Woman", and like you said, it casts doubt on that characteristic. With a group of the same editors writing these articles in virtual lockstep, one bad practice affects them all, and outside pressure (like this discussion) is needed to correct such behavior. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:44, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

This kind of reminds me of when you find publications still using “allegedly” after a criminal has already either plead guilty or been convicted with undeniable proof. Like “It’s obvious they did it so why is it 'allegedly' still being used?”. I know in some cases “sequel” can be used pretty loosely, like Bigger Fatter Liar, but Endgame and WW84 use the word “sequel” with every ounce of its meaning ever since their respective announcements. Endgame in particular was literally “Untitled Avengers Sequel” for at least a year!--Fradio71 (talk) 20:03, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Definitely release dates are purely hypothetical and they definitely slip and slip again, and even if the movie is done on time, they can move it for many reasons. It's totally fine to use cautious language to make clear the release date isn't certain and the studio's announced release date shuld be taken with a huge grain of salt. Any speculation as to how it will perform or whether it will win awards -- totally different, and should be treated with extreme skepticism, especially claims by the studio about how great it will be. As I said on

bikeshedding. --Dennis Bratland (talk

) 23:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Nobody is questioning, who is the distributor, or what type of sequel it might be. The question is “has it been distributed”. If the answer is no, you cannot factually say that it has been when not a single copy has been shipped. Likewise, you cannot call it the 22nd film before it has been released. As you all say release dates are subject to change. It could bomb in test screenings and be sent back for reshoots, in which case Spider-Man: Far from Home may end up being the 22nd film. This happened recently with both New Mutants and X-Men: Dark Phoenix. Captain Marvel traded slots with two other MCU films, it was originally supposed to be the 19th film and has fallen back to #21. Nothing is a sure thing.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 04:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi guys, just joining in here with my opinion. Triiiple is correct in that we cannot be certain of the future and need to carefully word things if they could change. That is a pretty basic CRYSTALBALL issue. Despite that, I would be willing to remove the "set" wording from it being a sequel since we know the film exists now, and that is something that could be applied across the page since filming has begun. So once filming begins, a film article can be certain about some things (it exists, it is being written and directed already, etc.) but we still need to be careful about changing release dates (when it comes out, what order it comes out in a franchise, etc.). - adamstom97 (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

And it was principally filmed right after Infinity War, so “intended to be the sequel” should be “is the sequel”, even if it never gets released, would still be “the unreleased sequel--Fradio71 (talk) 04:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Avengers Endgame: Here’s everyone who will return after Thanos’ snap Coolguy3478 (talk) 02:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Coolguy3478 (talk) 03:32, 30 December 2018 (UTC)