I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you.
Exsqueeze me? This "newcomer" was actually a sock puppet of a known vandal who was impersonating an administrator. I realize two wrongs don't make a right, but still. - Jasonbres (talk) 04:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here
to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
administrator
.
One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to
Jason: I've removed the "alternate future" occupations you added to several character infoboxes for Heroes. This sort of information isn't really needed in the 'box, especially since we have no idea how "stable" the possible futures are. If group consensus is in favour of such a change, I won't object, but I think you should probably discuss it first. Thoughts? --Ckatzchatspy21:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image tagging for Image:Pushing Daisies logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pushing Daisies logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thats what fans call it and the creator never said the "Pushing Daisies time." Obviously it is the Pushing Daisies time. Daisyverse is just a more specific word that fans call it. Look at the pushing daisies talk page.--Mugatu3333 (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
66.245.195.50
We seriously need to do something about this guy and his dumb edits.--Hailey 02:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Which "guy" and "edits" are you referring to? -- Jasonbres (talk)
User:66.245.195.50, the "Cartoon All-Stars 2000s" guy!--Hailey 03:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hailey C. Shannon (talk • contribs)
I added the material about the title reference back. I don't think your comment
You know what? I don't think we should assume what the title is referring to until we listen to the commentary on the DVD.
makes much sense; (1) what's known publicly about the plot makes it completely obvious that the Othello reference is intentional; (2) the inference that the 1955 film is also being referenced is no less conjectural than a dozen similar statements made about other episode titles; and (3) the notion that we must wait for a DVD commentary to divine the intention of a title seems to me to defy common sense. Let me know if and why you disagree.
revert them repeatedly: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoetytalk22:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Credits
FYI, the standard format for listing stars is alphabetical. Please don't just revert against this long-standing custom; if you do not agree with it, the better option is to open a discussion through the television project. Thanks. --Ckatzchatspy08:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I apologise for butting in, but putting them in alphabetical order is just ridiculous. It should be kept in the way they appear in the opening credits, and I am not aware of any other show on wikipedia that has its cast displayed in alphabetical order. - Loveem 16:22, 22 September 2008 (BST)
Friendly reminder
Be careful with the name-calling as you did here. Just a friendly reminder. I also happen to agree with Levineps adding Affleck's parody of Keith Olbermann. Please read the edit again; it doesn't say that Affleck hosted the show. If it had said that I would agree with you. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 15:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you going to build an album page at this time, or wait for more information? I'll be more than happy to create it, either in the articlespace or my userspace (is there isn't enough info yet). Say? —
Can you please stop including spoiler information in the cast list.
You seem to have a strange idea of what a spoiler is.
It means it gives away information that is not immediately obvious to a new viewer to the series.
Obviously if you have watched all the episodes then it is not a spoiler. But, in that case, what would be?
Ask yourself: do you think it is reasonable that somebody, after watching the 1st episode of pushing daisies, is told that Lily is Chuck's aunt? If not, then do not put it in the cast list.
If you don't agree with this then please post your reasoning on the discussion page before reverting.
Thank you
Hi there. Please do not remove information like you did with this edit just because you think it spoils the plot. Wikipedia has a strict guideline for these things, see
verifiable. You might not know this, but the movie has been leaked on the internet and while I personally did not download it, it is safe to assume that many many people did so and thus already have access to information you do not possess. Also, you need to consider that movies are given out in advance to journalists and magazines, just check how many reports on the movie's plot already exist at Google News. IGN for example is a reliable source. So please refrain from removing information that might spoil the plot - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a TV guide, our goal is completeness of information. Regards SoWhy15:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Demetri Martin
Please quit editing this information on his page, his show's page, or the page on prop comedy. Demetri Martin uses props in many of his stand up routines. This doesn't mean that is all he does, but her certainly uses props more than standard stand-up comedians. Describing him as a stand up and prop comedian does nothing to take away from any of the three articles. As a matter of fact, it only adds to them. Please quit editing the pages just because you do not believe it belongs there. When Demetri Martin stops using props in his comedy, maybe it would make sense to remove that information.
Since when? I've only seen him use drawings and musical instruments, but those aren't really props. Plus, Demetri has never once labelled himself as a prop comic. Carrot Top on the other hand IS definitely a prop comic. And a very s****y one at that, too. - Jasonbres (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The pen, the pad, the bottles, the instruments.....these are all props. As I stated above, he may not use as many props as Carrot Top or Gallagher, but he certainly uses more props than Sam Kennison, Artie Lange, Jerry Seinfeld or Tracy Morgan. One term is not exclusive to the other. He can be both a stand up and a prop comedian. Steve Martin is a good example of this.
Your edit summary here really isn't appropriate at all. Your edit is correct (because adding the date is
original research), but I would except better conduct from a longer term editor such as yourself. Please remember to assume good faith, and not bite the newbies. Prodegotalk04:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Looking at some of your other edit summaries, there are quite a few other issues going on, which I will try to address concisely:
"In general, red links should not be removed from articles if they link to something that could plausibly sustain an article."[2]
Please make sure you actually understand what you are doing before undoing others edits. It makes things difficult for everyone. If you aren't sure about something, ask for outside input, perhaps on a talk page, don't just act. Prodegotalk04:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're a regular here and fine as an editor, so this is not a criticism, just a friendly reminder. It's true that a warrant was issued for her, but remember that "
FoxFlash is often innacurate (e.g., in several releases they tend to say "Lila" rather than "Tabitha") whenever revealing new information about a series or episode. So your saying that your YouTube video and your source is (somehow) more correct than my YouTube video and my source. Please explain your rational - Arnett himself says here "Ennis rhymes with a male body part". I saw a YouTube video as well saying Happy's name is spelt with two "m"s - plus, how they pronounced it at the 09' WonderCon. Your not making sense. But you still seem to think that your right with everything. Please explain. -- Atalk/contribs21:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, nevermind. I see that the video you've cited is a more recent one, unlike the one I watched. I hadn't even bothered to look at the source you've added. My sincere apologies. -- Atalk/contribs21:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jason. I'd like to say I'm sorry. I know we have had our editing disagreements in the past and I wanted to apologize. I realize now that we're both just attempting to better the quality of Wikipedia. I'd also like to thank you for both watching and changing the
Unless the divorce has been finalized, Jon and Kate Gosselin are still married and cannot have any denotation of divorced or "ex" in the articles. Once the divorce has officially gone through, then it can be changed. Thanks. --13219:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Edit summaries
Mentioning this as I see it has been brought up before on your talk page - please use edit summaries for their intended purpose. Summaries such as [1] are unhelpful and far from
Thanks. Apologies too for spelling it wrong in the first place. I'll copy-edit more carefully in future. While I'm here, I've been meaning to say for a while, great work on maintaining all the Glee articles :) Frickative19:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey JasonBres! I was just wondering if you've noticed what is going on with the page for the new series of SNL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Live_(season_35)). A user named Compfunk has deleted all the notes next to the list of episodes, but only that page and not the previous seasons. He does not think it is necessary. He seems to have strong reservations. What are your thoughts. Could you look at the page and his edits and maybe discuss it with him? 65.92.21.111 (talk) 20:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)SAMUSEK2[reply]
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Theleftorium20:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Undoing revision 355564589, Loretta Brown
You completely reverted my edit to
Loretta Brown. I made numerous grammatical corrections that were necassary. I’m hoping that wasn’t your intention. Please be more careful next time. If there’s something I’m missing, feel free to let me know here. Thank you. Geeky Randy (talk) 05:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
You'll be happy to know I've confirmed something you've edited as correct; when you posted that the U2 version of One was used in Laryngitis, and someone later removed that information (prompting you to remove it from the episode page, I'm sure), I went today to confirm it a week to the episode's air date. I located this confirming it. It's another Wiki, so I've made a point to presume that the other Wiki (dedicated to Glee, interestingly) has researched this and if a better source is needed someone else will provide it...so thanks for that edit and I will now defend it myself. =) CycloneGU (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cyclone, (and Jason, I hope you don't mine me replying on your talk page - apologies if so!) thank you for trying to source the information. If you look at the
self-published sources that shouldn't be used on Wikipedia. From my experience, the standards external wikis use for inclusion are usually far less stringent than Wikipedia itself, and they often include speculation and outright rumour. It may well transpire in the end that it is the U2 version they're performing, and that's fine, but we can't say so until we have a suitably reliable source confirming it. The most recent reliable source I've found discussing it is this one, which notes that five days ago, no one connected with the show would give an official comment on whether it's the U2 version or not. So we really need something more solid than the word of a fansite wiki to counter that. Frickative13:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Frickative, I've placed a note on your talk page. I've changed my source to the FOX site specifically; echoing my remark at your page, it's hilarious that the only thing we're disagreeing about is who wrote and sang ONE song. *LOL* CycloneGU (talk) 14:20, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[Outdent] You might be interested in the discussion here, particularly the latter part.
Since it sounds like you haven't visited my talk page yet - where I specifically talk about the Glee Music confirmation, and it's also here...
I contacted FOX by e-mail yesterday directly from the main Web page (basically I went to www.fox.com) and inquired about it. While the second message was a little bit on the rude side in terms of how it came across (whether intended or not, but what do I know since FOX News is itself rude and unbalanced), a specific quote from the reply in question was, "The U2-written song was covered" (yes, they bolded it). I don't care whether they publish it or not; this is a good enough confirmation for me since we can't use Wikis as sources for obvious reasons. We just don't have a good way of verifying personal research on Wikipedia.
If you are still not satisfied with this explanation, I challenge you to use the Ask FOX feature and get the same confirmation. CycloneGU (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I forgot to sign my last comment, so I've put a sig on it based on my edit time.
I noticed the last edit and I agree my detail addon was unneeded there, so I won't challenge that removal. It just seemed silly to me that in the week preceeding a show that was taped over two months ago, we were challenging every source out there because the newspapers and reporters never cover this thing. *LOL* I had a discussion at length about "The Lady Is A Tramp" with Frickative as well since there are other versions of that not noted as covers...but I did not challenge the information specifically because (a) they are likely covers NEway, (b) the show uses show tunes frequently. No offense was meant in any of this, BTW, and thanks for doing the second step that I did as well. =) CycloneGU (talk) 23:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Can you please tell me how adding that "Grilled Cheesus" is a religion-based episode is considered too much information? If you take a look at featured article
Glee (season 1) article has passed rigorous reviewing to become an example of one of the best works on the English Wikipedia. I don't know of any rule that defines "too long" for episode summaries, or prohibits them. Yvesnimmo (talk) 00:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
The relevant guideline here is
WP:MOSTV, which states that plot summaries in tables should be 100-200 words, or 350 for complicated storylines. It's currently 28 words, and was 45 - definitely not way too long. Frickative01:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Right. I do not think it was too long. The summary will get changed anyway—very likely completely rewritten—after the episode airs to encompass more precisely the plot of the episode, and at that point, it will be even longer. Yvesnimmo (talk) 01:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The previous SNL seasons have no references. So do you want us to find archival evidence that THOSE hosts and musical guests appeared on the show? Of course not. It's a pain to do so. - Jasonbres (talk) 16:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jason, just alerting you to a slight problem at
Glee (season 2). With this edit you've added a new title for episode 8, but seemingly forgotten to include the actual reference :) This has prompted a none too clever bot to substitute in a 1997 review of Evita?!. I've checked MSN TV but can't see the title listed there, so perhaps you'd like to add it back in with whatever source you'd found? Cheers. Frickative14:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
ETA - just noticed that the TV Guide source previously in use has updated the page to reflect the "Furt" title, so nothing to change now! Frickative15:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
November 2010
Please check the references provided before you revert any changes, including this. An edit like that is not appreciated. If you click the link, you will see that it has indeed been released on the ninth of November. Yves (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I request that you please take the time and read the above article on original research and what it is. This is not an assumption of bad faith, but this has been a recurring issue, and I think you need to be aware of that to improve your skills as a Wikipedian. Thanks. Yves (talk) 22:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thanks for taking the time to ensure that we have proper sources for content about Winnie the Pooh (film). However, regarding this change, you reverted a lot of valid changes as well. I assume you only meant to revert the changes to the cast list, as all the other changes look good, AFAICT. Please restore the other changes. --Mepolypse (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I know how frustrating it is to know something is right, yet not be allowed to include it in the article. Before
Journey
aired, I had read on blogs from people who had physically attended the taping and scanned copies of the programs they'd received. Based on those blogs, I insisted that the information was valid as they actually got the info from the event and shared it with everyone. It however was considered "original research" or "invalid source" (because it was a blog). The big one for me was knowing who all of the judges were, including Rod Remington, but it wasn't allowed to add his name to the article because it wasn't properly sourced. Of course, he appeared in the episode itself as a judge, and only then did I get to finally add it to the article and it stuck.
Similarly, I found the "Glee Volume 4" article on tommy2.net which has been very accurate with its listings for Glee. They even included the album cover! Unfortunately, tommy2.net is still marked as an invalid source and therefore the page was not created until Amazon and iTunes caught up and released pre-order pages for it. I fought for this one as well in favour of tommy2.net because of its history, but to no avail.
Just be careful to only add anything that is properly sourced. Even Jimbo Wales has an article that he and those who know him can't add certain information to, and a discussion came up once as to whether his daughter in fact existed because the source was in question. *LOL* CycloneGU (talk) 16:34, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Original research
Jasonbres, you really, really need to stop with the
I'm sorry, I accidentally changed that page but I forgot to click on preview button. I want to chat with you few moments about Amy Adams. I know she engaged Darren Le Gallo in 2001. But I forgotten that name of that guy who's married her that I have changed. Did you know what is the name of that guy have married Amy Adams that I've changed? --AndyTheCop (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Now I remember that name, I got it, his name is Jonas Andromeda.
Maybe I thought Jonas Andromeda is a new boyfriend of Amy Adams. She engaged him on January 14, 2011. Now I know she hasn't married yet. --AndyTheCop (talk) 19:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
When Amy Adams engaged her new boyfriend, Jonas Andromeda on January 14, 2011, her daughter Aviana Olea Le Gallo might be renamed to Aviana Olea Andromeda. --AndyTheCop (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No. As I said I have to looking for sources. If I found that source, I will add it to that page if it's true. If I found no source, I don't add it to that page. --AndyTheCop (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good find on the Fox press release as displayed by The Futon Critic, which calls the episode "Pot of Gold". ("Pot 'O Gold" looked so wrong. It still does, for that matter.) It meant for some last-minute scrambling to fix the Did You Know? entry, which was already in the queue when you made the necessary move, but it got done in time.
Since the "Pot of Gold" article is currently a "Did You Know?" entry on the Wikipedia main page, if another even more authoritative source turns up in the next 10+ hours with yet another rendering, please hold off further renaming until the next batch of DYKs are moved to the main page; we don't want to have the article become unavailable, even temporarily, while it's being featured there. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 13:57, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Glee episode 8 on Season 3 page
Jason, there is enough conflicting information out there that I thought it best to remove your inclusion of episode 8 for the time being. These include:
the information that Morrison has said he's directing episode 8 (he said it a month ago; is it still true?)
the information that Overstreet is returning in episode 8 (also true according to Murphy)
the episode is still being written (again, true according to Murphy)
Harmony reappears in episode 8, which is apparently Sectionals: "She is sort of the Rachel of her school, and she's so amazing, and she will be competing against our groups," Murphy says. (zap2it's quote, from the 300th song interviews.)
episodes 10 and 11 will be in January, and Samuel's character will first be seen in one of them (Murphy via zap2it and others)
the Christmas episode is being done in December (true according to Ausiello and also The Futon Critic)
the Christmas episode is the ninth episode (true according to The Futon Critic)
it "looks like" Morrison is directing the Christmas episode (Ausiello again)
As you can see, the first and last two simply do not add up: someone's wrong here. And if we know that we're operating on partially bad information, it seems to me best to hold off until we get something better. According to a Lea Michele tweet, they finish episode 7 this week...or were going to until Naya Rivera came down sick. So episode 8 will have to start shooting soon...
If there had been an episode title included—reliably sourced, naturally—I'd probably have left it and cut out the Christmas info, but without that and with the new uncertainty about which episode Morrison was doing, there wasn't enough meat left.
Logic tells me that it's unlikely you'd have all the Christmas songs and all the Sectionals songs in a single episode: it's just not practical, especially if you want to feature Warblers, Harmony, and New Directions: the Christmas album has 12 songs on it, and you know they're going to feature four or five minimum. However, logic has a funny way of not always applying to Glee. And, of course, if episode 9 is the Christmas one, they certainly haven't finished writing it if episode 8 is also undone. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
November 2011
Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
Jasonbres, instead of a wholesale revert in "Extraordinary Merry Christmas", I should have deleted just the information that wasn't supported by the cited reference. I apologize. Thanks for restoring the Production sentence, minus Mayhew; it's important to have it. (Mayhew's living in Texas these days, according to his website, and has become a US citizen.) BlueMoonset (talk) 02:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
List of Smash episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Mayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
Jason, just wanted to let you know that I reversed my reversion and let stand your addition of "2Cellos" to the guest star list for "Michael". Fox is notoriously inaccurate (they omitted Grant Gustin from the episode's guest star list!), and the Production section has from the beginning mentioned their appearance. Since Sony/Columbia is Glee's label, they may have a better insight as to whether they are indeed treated like "guest artists", which ought to translate as guest stars... but it may not.
I think, however, that we have to give TV Guide and the Hollywood Reporter more weight than Amazon on "Human Nature" / "Nature Boy" for the present. Amazon has made mistakes before on song titles, and Hollywood Reporter generally confirms scoops from other sources before repeating information such as there being a mash-up, which they do state. I'm hoping we get more definitive statements soon confirming all ten songs; I'm sure there's going to be a lot released over the next ten days... BlueMoonset (talk) 02:55, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited
Characters of Glee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Summer Nights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
I know you undid this edit I made in the infobox: [2]. I don't disagree with it, since I introduced the story and teleplay infobox parameters to the article in the first place. I just added the small text mentioning the Teleplay and Television Story just to make it more clear to the other readers. Teleplay and Story credits usually aren't credited to solely one person as is the case with Theresa Rebeck with this pilot episode. The term "Television Story" is generally used when the episode writer actually adapted the show from another work. Smash is actually adapted from a book, I believe. QuasyBoy20:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. When you recently edited Once (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Carney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Glee (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rex Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pitch Perfect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Stop the Music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Jason, I like to have Glee articles up when there's real information in them, but not when the information is not only unsourced but inaccurate. Having noticed a number of inaccuracies in the unsourced production section of "Dynamic Duets", I'm going to have to revert your second attempt to start the article. It's a shame, since the episode will air in a week, but their are certain minimal standards that need to be maintained. If the same is true of "Thanksgiving", it too will have to revert to redirect status. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crossroads Guitar Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Booker T (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Your source saying that Frozen will be a 2014 film is probably because they made a mistake in the release. You must
think outside the box. (Thinking inside the box here would be assuming that the mention of 2014 was purposely that time in 2014; which would be almost 2015.) Georgia guy (talk) 17:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frozen (2013 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
List of Jimmy Fallon sketches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Your Body (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
I removed it due to some-one adding a 'citation needed' next to the "Shoichet also provides the singing voice of Twilight Sparkle." part. Asaraullo05 (talk) 03:25, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Glee (season 3)
I would like to tell you that in your contributing to
Glee (season 3) and that the prom episode was called "Prom-asaurus" so that means I was right and you were wrong, saying that wasn't the episode! Entertainer91 (talk) 01:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Simpsons Guy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Meighan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I saw you add transcript information for Doof 101 and Tales from the Resistance on the Phineas and Ferb Wiki. Yeah, I thought the Star Wars DVD was supposed to release November 11th, not now. How do you already have it? -- EvilLair (✉ | c)00:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history
, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
Hi Jasonbres, I'm inviting you to comment at this RfC about Phineas and Ferb season numbering, since I noticed that you had expressed an opinion in a discussion thread about the matter. That discussion quickly deteriorated, so I opened an RfC. One user thought it necessary to start using sockpuppets to vote up his POV, which has cast some shadows on the discussion and the RfC. Anyhow, you're pretty much up to date. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Saturday Night Live (season 40), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ready to Run. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
WP:CRYSTAL. Additionally, we are not allowed to copy content from another source and present it as our own, nor are we allowed to closely paraphrase it as both scenarios present copyright violation problems. The better approach is to wait until the episode airs to provide a summary, or, to take reasonable excerpts and present them as quotations, with the appropriate attribution in the form of a reference. This quotation would then have to be changed when the episode airs, because we cannot base the bulk of an article's content on excerpted, copyrighted content. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Disambiguation link notification for July 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Muppets (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Vogel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Saturday Night Live (season 41), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
Whoever you are, I love your contributions about "Saturday Night Live".
Whoever you are, I love your contributions about "Saturday Night Live". I read the Wikipedia articles all the time. I have watched that show since it first premiered. Great job, keep up the good work. Wikipedia is so lucky to have you.
You wrote on the article for The Ridiculous 6, "To no one's surprise, this film has been slammed by critics."
I don't doubt that, since the movie went straight to Netflix, but I'm sure you understand we need citations in reliable third party sources and we can't just give our own opinion. Jonathunder (talk) 23:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying how the cast members are credited. The place I got the episodes from apparently cuts the end credits off, and the only legitimate way available to view the episodes here is to wait until they air on the local Disney Channel.
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt into List of Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for July 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of BoJack Horseman episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Hollingsworth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Not the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited (I've Had) The Time of My Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Murphy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
By mistake, you pasted the ref link in edit summary. I already fixed it. :-) Just wanted to let you know. :-) —usernamekiran(talk)20:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You know, I wish things didn't have to be so conflicting over this particular person.
I can't understand why nobody can just go to Twitter, and simply ask the writer team about Joe Ballarini with a simple push of the button. I'm sure they'd be happy to answer the question.Austin012599 (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Milo Murphy's Law
I was basing it on how Lab Rats one hour specials work, where they have versions that are split into two parts, same with Phineas and Ferb (some Phineas hour-long episodes are on Netflix, and iTunes in France/Germany, in separate parts, forgot which ones it is as those are some of the few countries besides the US that has TV shows on iTunes). I guess we can wait to see how they'll handle this one before listing two parts for each half hour time frame. Cosmic Clone (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I'm not sure what's wrong with the edits I made. I realize the run time is affected by ads, which is why I put approximately. I also fail to see how I plagiarized anything... All I did was put, in my opinion, a better synopsis of the movie overall than just that it's after the show and answers questions left behind. Eternal Flame Baby (talk) 23:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
Is San Lorenzo supposed to be in South America or Central America? I haven't seen the movie, but I read elsewhere in Wikipedia that San Lorenzo is in Central America (which is considered part of North America). Goustien (talk) 06:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DuckTales (2017)
Hi.
You just removed episode information about the latest episode of DuckTales 2017, which aired on Disney XD Scandinavia (and possibly other places) Wednesday 21st March at 4PM CET, due to a lack of source. What kind of source would be acceptable to demonstrate that the episode exists and has been aired? Disney's Scandinavian webpages are ridiculously light on information, so there's no help to be found there. Reruns are scheduled every day until next Wednesday, when another new episode is scheduled.
I have a full recording of the episode, but obviously I can't link to that as a reference on Wikipedia. Would a screengrab of the title card do? https://twitter.com/trondmm/status/976478065630031877TrondM (talk) 10:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
May 2018
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
Hi. I've reverted an edit of yours which reinstated info I had removed claiming it was unexplained removal of content. I'm not sure if this was a mistake or not, but my removal was perfectly explained as you can see here: I was removing content which was directly copy-and-pasted from the TVPassport website. Wikipedia takes
Hello Jasonbres, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing,
Attacking users was not my intention. If you read it that way, I apologize. I just really despise people who have nothing better to do with their time than to constantly edit war Wikipedia articles. It is unproductive and often leads to situations like this. - Jasonbres (talk) 01:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What was that for? I was trying to fix my edits into the article better. I wasn't just undoing edits for the sake of it. Mk8mlyb (talk) 01:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jasonbres! Thank you for your recent contributions on articles related to amusement parks. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a WikiProject which aims to focus collaboration and improve the quality of amusement park articles across Wikipedia. Feel free to stop by to learn more and sign up at the Participants page. Hope to see you over there! --GoneIn60 (talk) 01:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of news corporations and others are capitalizing "Black" when referring to the skin color, and if you don't consider that capitalization, ergo, you are racist. I'm sorry for your lack of wokeness. - Jasonbres (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Did you even read the link I put in the description? Obviously not because you are too busy being all high and mighty undoing very constructive edits. - Jasonbres (talk) 23:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jasonbres, I read it the day it was published. I realize that other publications do this. Me abiding by our MoS does not make me a racist. Also, please answer my second question. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯00:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. They just got back to me and informed me that it is indeed being discussed. Okay, I've cooled down, and I'm sorry about my language. I probably should've said "out of touch" or nothing at all, rather than "racist". We cool? - Jasonbres (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask why you changed the page of legend of everfree? I just want to know, I’m not looking for trouble, I’m asking politely why you changed it. Natethgreat1 (talk) 02:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zoey's Extraordinary Playlist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alice Lee.
Your find/replace method of capitalizing "black" is breaking hyperlink addresses
I understand you are trying to improve the encyclopedia, but these are not improvements. Please discontinue making this change on any other articles. TarkusABtalk/contrib00:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Don't be sorry--but I don't agree that it's inherently racist; that's too strong. User:TarkusAB, I read over that discussion, and if we do that again today you might see a different result. At any rate, you can hardly forbid this user from capitalizing Black: that discussion simply means that Black with capital B is not the guideline. It doesn't mean editors can't capitalize it if they so choose, and I for one will continue to do so. BTW I find it interesting that in that discussion all the lowercase editors seemed to be right wing/conservative, and when I see it happen in article space it's often racist trolls. Drmies (talk) 02:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies: Haha! what a coincidence about the user page. So I'm not well versed in the caps issue, and only found that discussion as the closest thing to a MOS stance on the topic. I don't have strong feelings on the issue, but regardless, Jasonbres should remember to avoid changing the caps style in hyperlinks as it breaks the links. TarkusABtalk/contrib03:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:TarkusAB, I really don't know when capitalization matters anymore for wikilinks, but if you're right, you're right. In that case Jasonbres could of course create some redirects. I'm not sure how well-versed I am in caps and in the MOS, but it's one of those things that, for now, is sort of up to the editor; that discussion didn't mandate either way. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:08, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Color Purple. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You've already been asked not to capitalize "black", and I saw no consensus in favor of doing so, so I'm forced to assume that you're now intentionally disregarding the prior notice.DonIago (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You were linked to the MoS discussion regarding the matter previously. If you want to take issue with it, you're welcome to do so at the appropriate Talk page. If you continue to knowingly make these edits in violation of
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Behind the Attraction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Davis.
I wrote the reasons on the talk page, I even wrote those reasons twice. [4] I read these news, it doesn't say anything about "rumors". User HoneymoonAve27 did the same to the HBO Max page removed the countries mentioned in the source. I wrote the same thing on the talk page in September but he didn't look at it [5]Eray08yigit (talk) 17:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
original research. If you find appropriate sources for that passage, feel free to re-add it, or point them out to me, and I'll add it back in myself. Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 18:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
Hi. The Productions section of the article mentions the new Lydia and the rest of the cast of the resumed run. This is not a revival and should not have its own column in the cast table. The full cast is mentioned in the Productions section. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CRYSTAL, the casting tables in articles about musicals should not add new columns until the production begins previews. So many musicals get cancelled (or greatly postponed) at the last minute, and the casting tables are often overloaded as it is. Thanks for any help with this! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
The source cited to justify one of new writers, season 48, is absolutely bogus. It's ideological maneuvering and it's explicitly discussed amongst these people seeking to disseminate BS about how to circumvent Wikipedias citing sources, etc. It'd be a shame to see an encyclopedia held in such high regard undermined by scheming clout chasers using Wikipedias prolific presence as a medium for this rotten practice. The woman contributed nothing to the season thus far and has yet to have any official contract signed. How can she be listed as a writer, unpaid intern or contributor if she's in fact none of these things?
I implore you to keep high standards of the encyclopedia and be vigilant for fraudulent sources used as citation.
Thank you, and please be wary of this August White. She's been trying to insert her name all over this site for months. 197.253.198.175 (talk) 06:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The user 197.253.198.175 is being incredibly racist by erasing Auguste White from the Writers section in the season 48 page and I have proof of them doing so. This is a message I received from them: "Keep that nappy headed ho off the site. This is the beginning. Keep this up and 1000% she'll be hit by petition to be permanently banned from anything to do with SNL or NBC at large. Tens of thousands of people on petition, endless barrages on social media and absolute character assassination. This is final warning." Can you please have them blocked and reported as this extremely disgusting and evil behavior. I can't believe this. This is completely unacceptable. Blu30Top (talk) 15:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for informing me. I had my suspicions because rarely does anyone with an IP address for a username actually post messages on talk pages. - Jasonbres (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Jasonbres (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kimberly Akimbo (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akimbo.
That would've worked, but I simply reduced it to "Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy" to make it simpler, I just wanted to clarify the definition of prequel because it's a mistake I've seen even in reputable sources from time to time. —El Millo (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
I apologize for that. I let my anger get the best of me. I've been editing on this site for many years and probably should've known better. It won't happen again. I promise. - Jasonbres (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Futurama - "The Impossible Stream"
Jasonbres, the first 5 episodes of the new Futurama season have aired and no one made the articles, can you at least tell the story of "The Impossible Stream". PLEASE?!PowerRanger200 (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Doubt: A Parable, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
I believe there is a mix up and an error in the April shows for season 49 of SNL. Kristen Wiig is hosting in April 6 and Ryan Gosling is hosting in April 16. there is no April 20th show. M1107290 (talk) 01:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What on earth went through your mind when you created Raped McForehead as a redirect to a BLP? I do hope this is a past mistake that you have learnt from. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think at the time, it was trending on Twitter, and I created a redirect for people who wanted to know who that name was referring to. - Jasonbres (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And you didn't pause to think 'hey, maybe I shouldn't make a redirect which blazingly violates
Okay, by now this is not funny in the slightest, not only that is offensive, but it also breaks
WP:BLP. Even if it was on Twitter/X you found it on and it was trending, it doesn't make it right to put it as a redirect on Wikipedia. So just stop, like actually stop. Okay, the next time you do this, the admins can place a permanent ban on you. mer764KC / Cospaw⛲️ (He/Him | 💬Talk! • 📦Contributions) 11:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you.
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lindsay Lohan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Theleftorium 20:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add 
.jpg)
