Talk:Barbara Rose Johns

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconVirginia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen's History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States History
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Untitled

"Teenage activism is an important aspect of history, and the people involved should be remembered."

While I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment, doesn't this violate the NPOV policies of Wikipedia by stating an opinion as fact? 71.215.129.154 16:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article as Example of BOT generated Problems

This article - should anyone take the time to review it - is an excellent example of BOT generated references that because of their very limited capability in logic, do not check for conflicts. All of the reference problems in this article (and there were 4 or 5 to start with) were created by robot software that was used to add references to an article. In the various instances, it seems that the BOT was unable to see (detect) the earlier work of another BOT, and its reference definitions that were already used. It is a fairly frequent problem throughout Wikipedia and for that reason alone should be looked into by a technocrat... Regards... Stevenmitchell (talk) 16:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Barbara Rose Johns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]