Talk:Caroline Aherne

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Caroline Aherne article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days

A news item involving Caroline Aherne was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 4 July 2016.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Greater Manchester Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Comedy High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Television Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sad news. However, neither of the cited sources give a date of death; it's quite possible that Aherne died yesterday, or even earlier. Does anyone have a reliable source that does? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pigsonthewing (talk • contribs) 12:07, July 2, 2016 (UTC–4)

Andy, I think your issue has now been resolved? The Guardian says "earlier today". Martinevans123 (talk) 18:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier today, so that's between 12am to 12pm. Sometime in between. You know, righttttt in between those times. You know, just sometime within those slots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.218.106 (talk) 19:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first edit here was at 15:43, so I think we can assume it was not later than that. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, it was between 12am to 3:43pm. Cheers for widening the gap! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.218.106 (talk) 19:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pigsonthewing was asking about the date of death. I don't think there's any dispute about that any more? Wikipedia articles very rarely give a time of death. So I don't think it matters. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The lead image, under fair use rationale, is this one,uploaded in 2017. Is that really the best that can be employed under fair use? If that really is the best, I think the article might be better off without it. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]