Talk:Confessionalism (politics)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Religion ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Religion in Iran#Reserved Majlis seats|similar system]] The anchor (#Reserved Majlis seats) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The reference to the Netherlands seems rather disturbing. Most countries have some confessional political parties - but this does far from make the political system confessionalist. If no objections I will delete the sentence. Bertilvidet 17:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liberalism - liberal, confessionalism - confessional sounded logical to me. Moreover both the Confessional entries say nothing about christian democracy and I wanted to put the information somewhere. To me knowledge only the Dutch refer to their parties as confessional, atleast as far as the evidendence on wikipedia tells me. But if you feel strongly about this removed it.

BTW can you provide me with any links to academic sources on this use of the term confessionalism?

--C mon 21:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You don't remove things because you "feel strongly" about them, that's what's wrong with WP. Things are either right or wrong, it's not how they make you feel. This article has been unfixable for so long maybe it should be removed.--Cuthbert Bargepole (talk) 21:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether or not the section is relevant, this sentence doesn't make sense:

"A traditional norm in society, extending to many facets of cultural life, termed pillarisation."

not sure if it was meant to be "is termed pillarisation", or the sentence was cut in the middle. NourEhsan (talk) 09:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should the proposed political dispensation in

I think the Bertilvidet has it -- countries that have confessional parties don't necessarily have political systems that match this definition of 'confessionalism'. As for N. Ireland, the Good Friday Agreement tends to be referred to as consociational. Even if 'confessionalism' is really a valid label for a political system, I'm not sure N. Ireland would count. While the fault lines are along religious lines, the issues are political (republicanism vs unionism) rather than centered around any religious questions.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.15.188.127 (talk • contribs)

I think N Ireland should at least be noted in this article. IMO it does satisfy the criteria for Confessionalism, but in any case let the reader decide by linking appropriately. Fig (talk) 14:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confessionalism (politics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.islamitischdemocratischepartij.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—