Talk:Copyright

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Refreshing brilliant prose
Kept
June 6, 2005Featured article reviewDemoted
May 2, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article
WikiProject iconLaw Enforcement Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Government
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconComputing: Free and open-source software
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Top-importance).
inactive
.
WikiProject iconOpen Access Top‑importance
WikiProject iconCopyright is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconIntellectual property
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Intellectual property, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Intellectual property on Wikipedia.

Example

I think it's a good idea to put Steamboat Willie in this article, with the following caption, put in italic below:

The copyright status of early works such as the 1928 film Steamboat Willie in the United States and in other nations has been subject to controversy due to lobbying by copyright owners. SuperFeral (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use isn't limited to USA

I can't edit bacause of protection. Retardproof (talk) 20:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

US or UK?

The talk page header says to use American twice, but the actual article is tagged with British. Which one is actually supposed to be used? IPs are people too 🇺🇸🦅 20:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch (to both). The article template was only added in July--this definitely should be in American English. Alyo (chat·edits) 20:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Continental law

In many jurisdictions of the European continent, copyright laws did exist in history but did change under Napoleantic rule into another legal concept: "authors' rights" or "creator's right". The German, Austrian and Swiss jurisdiction know the creator's right (Urheberrecht), other jurisdictions know the authors' rights. Authors' and creators' rights in general are absolute owner (or property) rights, that one doesn't have to apply for, the rights apply by the operation of law. No copyright symbol needed. Some people think the wording "copyright" can be used for a description of the continental law concepts and vice versa, but that is a misunderstanding. Both legal concepts differ pretty much. I'll start a paragraph on continental law, as a "stub". Please native english speakers, help improve it, for instance by summarising the given sources in correct english. Thanks. -VanArtevelde (talk) 11:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Ownership of articles has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20 § Ownership of articles until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 06:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

US Centricity

Hello. I just created my account today, so please forgive any newbie mistakes :) I wanted to share my thoughts on this article:

The article seems very US-centric. Many sections explain general concepts of copyright and then provide specific examples of US implementation. While it's appropriate to include examples of US laws, it would be beneficial to expand the scope.

I especially feel that the section on Duration could benefit greatly from focusing on global durations. While many countries have the same duration as the US due to international treaties, the differences that do exist are what's actually important. DislekzticBoi (talk) 21:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]