A fact from Eva Julius appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Eva Julius is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Eva Julius is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: Hello BJCHK, and thanks for nominating this Evrik! The article is new enough, long enough and is sourced and neutral. It is plagiarism free and a QPQ is done. The hook is cited, and is based on a good quote, however, I think you need to add quotation marks to the hook. Also, there are two points in the article that need clarifying - they are where I've put superscript "by whom" and "citation needed". Sadly, the image isn't free to use, so I don't think it can be used on the DYK, as its only under a "fair use" license. If you can tidy those couple of things that would be great! Lajmmoore (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lajmmoore The "by whom" issue was taken care of by someone else. I took care of the "citation needed" issue, referenced other information, and removed one and a half sentences that I couldn't source. SL93 (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The creator sourced the information that I couldn't. SL93 (talk) 13:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SL93 thanks for letting me know, I've added quotes to the hook, and checked and the DYK (without the image is good to go. Thanks for helping out with this Lajmmoore (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
- n
Hello BJCHK, and thanks for nominating this Evrik! The article is new enough, long enough and is sourced and neutral. It is plagiarism free and a QPQ is done. The hook is cited, and is based on a good quote, however, I think you need to add quotation marks to the hook. Also, there are two points in the article that need clarifying - they are where I've put superscript "by whom" and "citation needed". Sadly, the image isn't free to use, so I don't think it can be used on the DYK, as its only under a "fair use" license. If you can tidy those couple of things that would be great! Lajmmoore (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)