This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Review comments: Renata (talk) 01:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Smuglewicz and Brenna
They co-produced Vestigia delle Terme di Tito in late 1770s ( http://www.zlotydom.mnw.art.pl/en.html ). Is there any reliable attribution of these engravings to either Smuglewicz or Brenna or it's mixed up forever?
For a great extend of period, certain range of IPs (124.190.113.128, 203.56.87.254, 131.170.90.3, 131.170.90.4, etc.), controlled by the same person IMO, are trying to eliminate certain sources from this article. Recently IP started campaigning that particular source (McLachlan, Gordon (2008). Lithuania. Bradt. p. 320.
ISBN 0813530423. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) and so far particular source meets RE requirements. So, at this point I find constant IPs reverts as nonconstructive at all. M.K. (talk) 20:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
I still waiting for answer , why IP (124.190.113.128 and similar) removing references without any rationale. M.K. (talk) 10:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
