Talk:Geraldine Brooks (writer)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). Australia: Literature Low‑importance Geraldine Brooks (writer) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance). Journalism Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

How can I change the title so that "brooks" becomes "Brooks"?

With the "move" command. Done. silsor 22:26, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

Put the list of books in the bibliography in chronological order to comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works). Al Jacques (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would move to change her affiliation to atheist -- if you read her article in the Washington Post she affirms no belief in a god -- I suppose you could leave her claiming to be Jewish but I digress.165.123.243.168 (talk) 22:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have any idea why the link to (http://loadedquestions.blogspot.com/2008/04/loaded-questions-interview-with.html) was removed by the Xlinkbot? Looks okay to me. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 03:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it looks ok to me, but is there some Wiki preference for not linking to blogs? If there is, that might need revisiting as there are blogs and there are blogs, if you know what I mean. But maybe someone else knows why this was removed.Sterry2607 (talk) 07:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think we have to look at external sources on their merits rather than making a blanket judgement about their worth purely because they are a blog. I've conducted a couple of interviews on my weblog that I consider are of interest. I haven't linked to them because I'm not sure if that would be considered ethical or not. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 22:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080314194752/http://www.opcofamerica.org:80/opc_awards/archive/awards_1990.php to http://www.opcofamerica.org/opc_awards/archive/awards_1990.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified one external link on Geraldine Brooks (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080804055538/http://www.kwls.org/lit/kwls_blog/2008/07/scaffolding_for_the_imaginatio.cfm to http://www.kwls.org/lit/kwls_blog/2008/07/scaffolding_for_the_imaginatio.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]