Talk:House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Portugal Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: edit history watch purge Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Edit this list Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Princess Theresa Christine of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha and her descendants, the Tasso of Saxe-Coburg and Braganza family, are not from this same house. They were descended from the marriage of

Since 1932, also

It should be mentioned in the article; not only the Miguelist claimants/pretenders. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The edits are without any context and furthermore Maria Pia was not a member of the House the article is about. Furthermore POV edits are attached. Also the first Braganza Saxe Coburg to reign was Pedro V. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So you must delete Duarte Nuno of Braganza information because the information about him and his Miguelist family related to this article is false. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 16:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You still promoting false information, Hebel (talk · contribs). Anjo-sozinho (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How does that work as I'm only removing yours? And how are the claims of an illegitimate child of a king, who as far as we know is not even that, relevant for the purposes of these articles? Anybody can claim to be a pretender, and some get more publicity than others, but we need to stay at least a little serious. As you very well know because we have been through all of this before. I sometimes seriously wonder if you know what you're talking about. The right of succession of Miguel's descendants was restored in principle long before the abolition of the monarchy, and the talks between the two branches after the abolition were not about that! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That restoration is false and is just one of their new claims (based on his supporters opinion). Nothing more. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you,

• Humberto Delgado; Memórias (Colecção "Compasso do tempo"). Lisboa, 1974, pp. 233–234.
• Manuel de Bettencourt e Galvão; Ao Serviço d'El-Rei (Cadernos Políticos), Lisboa: Gama, 1949, pp. 123–129.
• A.H. de Oliveira Marques; História de Portugal - Vol. III'. Lisboa, 1982.
• Jean Pailler; D. Carlos I Rei de Portugal. Lisboa: Bertrand Editora, 2000, pp. 158.
• Jean Pailler; Maria Pia: A Mulher que Queria Ser Rainha de Portugal. Lisboa: Bertrand, 2006.
• Jean Pailler; A tragédia da Rua do Arsenal. Lisboa: Editorial Planeta, 2009.
• Mariano Robles Romero Robledo & José António Novais; Humberto Delgado : assassinato de um herói. Lisboa, 197-.
• Fernando Luso Soares; Maria Pia, Duquesa de Bragança contra D. Duarte Pio, o senhor de Santar. Lisboa: Minerva, 1983.
• Mário Soares; Portugal amordaçado: depoimento sobre os anos do fascismo. Lisboa: Arcádia, 1974, pp. 274–278.
• Francisco de Sousa Tavares; O caso de Maria Pia de Bragança (13 de maio de 1983), in Escritos Políticos I, Porto, Mário Figuerinhas, 1996, pp. 246–251.
• José María Zavala; La Infanta Republicana: Eulalia de Borbón, la oveja negra de la Dinastía. Madrid: Plaza & Janes, 2008.
• José María Zavala; Bastardos y Borbones. Los hijos desconocidos de la dinastía. Madrid: Plaza & Janes, 2011.
• Ronald H. Chilcote; The Portuguese Revolution: State and Class in the Transition to Democracy. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2012, pp. 37.
• Isabel Lencastre; Bastardos Reais - Os Filhos Ilegítimos Dos Reis De Portugal. Lisboa: Oficina do Livro, 2012.
• Fernando Dacosta; O Botequim da Liberdade. Lisboa: Casa das Letras, 2013, pp. 176–177.

These sources are sufficiently varied to attest that this is not a simple assumption on the lady of parenthood. The article of

• Miguel, Duke of Braganza (false title, he is just a pretender) should be renamed as his real name Miguel Januário de Bragança
  and used the correct Pretender/Infobox in his article;
• Duarte Nuno de Bragança
  and used the correct Pretender/Infobox in his article;
• Duarte Pio de Bragança
  and used the correct Pretender/Infobox in his article;
• Isabel, Duchess of Braganza (false title, she is just a pretender) should be renamed to her real name Isabel de Herédia
  and used the correct Pretender/Infobox in her article;

Etc... Anjo-sozinho (talk) 22:38, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the evidence the lady presented for her case. And find an actual academic historian who says she is an illegitimate daughter of Carlos. And then find an actual academic scholar who, in a

reliable source, magically makes it so that she was entitled to the succession to the Portuguese throne. It simply can't be done. The claims by Maria Pia are too outlandish. a) She claims to be the illegitimate daughter of Carlos I which she has no proof of whatsoever b) She claims her "father" put her in line to the throne which she has no proof of whatsoever, and even if he did, the king had no right to do. PERIOD! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 22:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I would like to note for the record that I fully agree with the most recent addition made to the article by Cristiano Tomás that gives a fair account of the matter surrounding the claims made by Maria Pia. As far as I'm concerned the matter has been solved by consensus. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 23:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who promoted the revertions in this article was not me, but the other user (Gerard von Hebel). He intends to win the community by "fatigue" through its constant revertions on a matter which he is not understood. Please verify that he also has eliminated information that remains verifiable literature sources. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 20:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The user Gerard von Hebel replaced again the false information with a fantasy title and invented "Pact" atributed to Duarte Nuno "Duke of Braganza". Please... there's any neutrality here! Anjo-sozinho (talk) 22:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits, rather than those of Gerard von Hebel, are those which attempt to insert allegations and interpretations about members of this dynasty and Portuguese claimants that are against consensus, as I also dissent from them. Please obtain consensus for these types of assertions here prior to insertion. FactStraight (talk) 01:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to note for the record that I fully agree with the most recent addition made to the article by Cristiano Tomás that gives a fair account of the matter surrounding the claims made by Maria Pia. As far as I'm concerned the matter has been solved by consensus. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 01:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus? False information don't have consensus. Miguel Januário de Bragança (his real name) was just a pretender (King

Trying a consensus: Hello Gerard von Hebel, I made a new neutral proposal, based on Cristiano Tomás version, to the article House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. I hope now (both of you) accept that: it's neutral, based on the references and sustained in what Cristiano previously wrote. See here. I hope to hear from you soon. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 16:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cristiano made some alterations and so have I, leaving out words like "alledgedly", actually leaving out the entire Dover and Paris pacts, and words like "apparently" and "undisputed" as far as Carlos I rights and the proof provided by Maria Pia was concerned. I also changed her name back to Portuguese and reincluded "calling herself", as we don't know what she was named at birth and as we do know she adopted the name as a young woman. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 21:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is POV and not consensual information. The consensual information was published by me under the information avaliable on the references. Please, stop POV and stop replacing titles of fantasy. If you want to call "Duke" to Miguelist claimants, you must call "Duchess" also to Maria Pia. I cannot accept your changes, they are not based on a neutral pont of view or factual accuracy. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article still with false and not consensual information. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To participate and view an ongoing dispute concerning various aspects of articles pertaining to the Miguelist dukes, Maria Pia of Braganza, and the Braganza-Coburg articles, and an ongoing dispute between editors User:Anjo-Sozinho, User:Hebel, and myself, see here. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 23:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]