Talk:James Naughtie

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Radio: UK Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome! To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Collaboration of the Week : Requests for Radio peer review: Rod Serling The Howard Stern Show The History of Rock & Roll American Top 40; The Museum of Curiosity; Scott Mills (radio show) Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. BBC Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. Journalism Low‑importance

On

31 December 2004, he appeared on a Radio 4 Hamish and Dougal Hogmanay

special. He played Mrs. Naughtie's son.

Thank You, [[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 12:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone wants to try to get this past the BLP zealots, here are some

guardian.co.uk, BBC, The Telegraph, The Independent, The Herald Sun Reuters Africa Buddy431 (talk) 20:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing alone is not the issue, there are matters of

undue weight to consider as well. It would also be in your best interests to drop the heated rhetoric (i.e. BLP zealots) from your remarks in the future. Tarc (talk) 20:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

--121.209.162.126 (talk) 20:39, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately for you (fortunately for us), the article is semi-protected. Tarc (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the Jeremy C/Hunt gaffe – which was covered in nearly all UK newspapers – deemed to be trivial, while Naughtie's appearance in an edition of Hamish and Dougal is apparently of great significance and importance? Please could someone offer objective criteria for this decision? Matthau (talk) 12:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. Removed. --

Errant ^(chat!) 12:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

What's "undue weight" got to do with anything? It's not a matter of opinion; the spoonerism definitely happened, and received significant media coverage. Why can't it be mentioned, then? 92.29.5.6 (talk) 22:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering whether it's politicking which is keeping the spoonerism incident off Wikipedia...Marty jar (talk) 22:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that on November 6 2012, he is going to be some radio coverage of news of the U.S. presidential election. If any one knows more about this than me, he or she could add it to the article. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]