Talk:Jane Fallon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

Ricky Gervais' page does not contain a section on Jane Fallon, yet her page is almost entirely devoted to the fact that she is the partner of Ricky Gervais. This is incredible seism in action, especially considereing that she is very accomplished in her own right. This is very disappointing.

If it's disappointing then you get in there and improve it! :-) I agree, have added a tag for expansion and now that she is a successful author I think there should be a separate section on her books. What does anyone else think? Beantrees (talk) 10:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation

Is the quotation about Ricky Gervais really relevant? Beantrees (talk) 10:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

now removed it. Beantrees (talk) 12:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fame

"Most famous for her work..." is probably untrue. She is most famous via Ricky Gervais. Maybe the sentence should read "her most famous works..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.76.119 (talk) 19:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jane Fallon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]