Talk:Josephine MacLeod

A fact from Josephine MacLeod appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 September 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Josephine MacLeod, an American devotee of Swami Vivekananda considered the day she met the Swami for the first time as her "spiritual birthday"? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Josephine MacLeod.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Swami Vivekananda Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swami Vivekananda, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swami Vivekananda on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Swami VivekanandaWikipedia:WikiProject Swami VivekanandaTemplate:WikiProject Swami VivekanandaSwami Vivekananda articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article was last assessed in September 2013. India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article too closely paraphrases at least some of its source. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following example from [1]:

Even after Swamiji's death, Josephine continued to be an admirer of the Ramakrishna Order and often came and stayed at the Belur Math headquarters of the Order for many days.

The article says:

Even after Swami Vivekananda's death in 1902, Josephine continued to be an admirer of the Ramakrishna Order and often came and stayed at the Belur Math headquarters of the Order for many days.

There are other passages that similarly follow too closely. I do not know if other sources are also closely paraphrased.

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this article should be revised. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be

Please let me know at my talk page if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Few weeks ago I created this article, just today I saw someone went to AFC to create the same article. Naturally it got denied as article already existed! He then copied all portion from AFC and pasted in the article! Suggestions? Manually rewriting is going to be a tough work (for me at least)--Tito Dutta (talk) 19:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tone of this article is not

• You are edit warring. Why did not you mention the issues while tagging the article. Just Fanpov does not mean anything. I have removed the sentence. Anything else? Your quick response will be very much appreciated. Tito☸Dutta 04:32, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The Twinkle tagger does not include a space for rationale; that doesn't make the tag illegitimate. I suggest you go through the whole article and check whether it conforms with
  WP:BETTER to be helpful in considering terminology and phrasing. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Sorry, Titodutta, but I also think this article could do with the removal of some adjectives. I might not have tagged it, but I see Nikkimaria's point. Drmies (talk) 04:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• {{
  Fanpov}} is a useless template. When I tried to add comment, it broke the template. A much better way is— tag the problematic portions/sections/setences, unless the whole article needs to be rewritten. I have removed adjectives and rewritten some portions, Please check now. Your quick reply will be once more appreciated. Tito☸Dutta 04:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• What tag would you prefer? I usually tag the whole thing when I see multiple instances of problematic phrasings. And there still are, such as "erudite Vedantic lectures" (not supported by the source) and "people who mattered" (according to...?). Nikkimaria (talk) 05:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Fixed both. Tito☸Dutta 05:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in reading this article I was not able to determine the notability of the subject. Since it's been around awhile, I thought I'd ask here rather than tag it. Any clarification anyone can provide would be appreciated. Dictioneer (talk) 16:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• She was an exponent of Vedanta and a freind-devotee of Vivekananda. There are few dedicated biographies on her such as this, this. I have not got this books still. These book are needed to expand her "last life". Tito☸Dutta 16:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Josephine MacLeod. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120918021529/http://www.vivekananda.net/pplheknew/SVDisciples/JosephineMcCleod.html to http://www.vivekananda.net/pplheknew/svdisciples/JosephineMcCleod.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120918021529/http://www.vivekananda.net/pplheknew/SVDisciples/JosephineMcCleod.html to http://www.vivekananda.net/pplheknew/svdisciples/JosephineMcCleod.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]