Talk:Kata'ib Hezbollah

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Middle East This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Middle Eastern military history task force Iraq Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Syria This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Terrorism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121003135853/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iXFldvDeEgr9cymXdQWf-QId7BqA to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iXFldvDeEgr9cymXdQWf-QId7BqA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

"Indeed, I was wondering the same with you. The paragraph you introduced: [...] That doesn't sound too fluent English to me."

I don't know if you're lying or misremembering, but I did not introduce that paragraph. It was already on the page when I started editing. I improved its grammar, because it was in broken English when I arrived. Anyways, you have no room to criticize my grammar when your contribution to the article was "It has been active in the Syrian Civil War, as well as it has participated some battles against the Islamic State in Iraq.", which is horribly grammatically incorrect.

"As quoted above, you carried out three edits[1][2][3] after I had placed the {{In use}} tag.[4]"

Like I said previously, I started them before I saw the tag and stopped editing after I saw it.

"So do you have sources stating that they are fighting in a large-scale in Iraq? There might be plenty of reasons if they aren't doing so. So far, the sources have pointed out some specific battles only."

They have fought in multiple battles in the war since the beginning and show no sign of stopping, therefore they're part of the war. Why are you disputing this? Do you believe that, because they haven't fought ISIS within the last few months, they're not part of the war anymore? If that's your logic, then none of the other Popular Mobilization Forces are part of the war against ISIS either, since they've been mostly inactive for a few months. Like most of your other objections, this is petty, semantic, nonsense.

1.since other editors coudln't be bothered to come to the talk page (despite their obnoxious insistence that tohers do so) 2.im not going to bother reverting the war crimes bit anyone to save an edit war 3.but if the other editors had bothered reading the reuters article instead of edit warring, they would see that the text on the page is all exactly the same as on the reuters article, and it essentially consists of a quote from the UN commissioner on human rights I did not add anything extra. So shut up and stop lying about NPOV 4.the real, very strange NPOV issue is why some editors would want to go out of their way to whitewash the wikipedia page of a terrorist group? 5.Jayaguru-Shishya, what is your agenda in supporting terrorism on wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.112.148.181 (talk) 14:47, 7 July 2016

WP:PERSONAL attacks on other users. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

• Nujabaimage.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to my dictionary كتائب means battalion not brigade, as mentioned in the article. I am not an expert, but it could be significant. PlasmaZebulon (talk) 16:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]