Talk:Kristersson cabinet

This agreement will be the policy of the incoming government. The cabinet's article should be the place where its policy is detailed so that as much as possible is in one place. ~ lovkal (talk) 09:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose merging. Within a couple of hours, the
  Kristersson Cabinet will expand with government ministers, and so will the article. J 1982 (talk) 22:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Oppose merging - No point in merging article. This is about an highly important political event in Sweden. It will certainly be expanded and improved as well.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose merging, for two reasons (while I do understand the argument for merging). a) While it is the foundation for the formation of the government, there are many aspects where the government will not be ruled by the Tidö Agreement. b) I think it would be a mistake to see the Tidö Agreement merely as a way to form government, given how it is an agreement on parliamentary action including a party which is not part of the government. /Julle (talk) 22:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - The document pertains substantially to matters outside of the work of the Kristersson Administration itself. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. The agreement has been described as unprecedented by political commentators in Sweden. A brief description in Kristersson Cabinet would probably not be in-depth enough to describe the impact on Swedish politics. /Jiiimbooh » TALK – CONTRIBS 07:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - By merging it will create problems and that Tido agreement elements would be under represent if the marger goes ahead. Villian Factman (talk) 11:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]