Talk:Maciej Cegłowski

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 June 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Poland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

In attempt to provide a simpler more factual structure to the article, I re-organized the article into subsections (Speaking, Writing, Personal Life) and added numerous external references (the lack thereof being one of the motivations for a recent CFD).

This is the version with my edits:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maciej_Ceg%C5%82owski&oldid=726104378

Subsequently Blythwood simplified the article to one that is more of a summary with prose rather than explicit lists of notable (per external reference) accomplishments:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maciej_Ceg%C5%82owski&oldid=726108176

I am not sure if this is merely a difference in article structuring personal preference, or if one or the other of these is more "correct" for Wikipedia, so I am raising it here as a talk item in the hopes that others will help clarify which is better for a Wikipedia bio article (preferably with Wikipedia citations). Thanks!

Tantek (talk) 02:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @t Tantek. Both forms are acceptable, although yours is preferable in my Wikipedia-informed opinion. Regardless, this BLP of Maciej has been saved from AfD ignominy, so all is well. I am an ardent deletionist but only when warranted. Thank you for your efforts to keep Wikipedia great!--FeralOink (talk) 02:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the sources here, and I am concerned they are not sufficient for

• @Piotrus: - I decided to expand this article out from the article on his company (it's Pinboard, by the way, not Pinterest - that's something else) when it became clear to me that much of his notability was for his writing and speaking rather than his company. If you look at (say) the Gruber sources, they don't even mention Pinboard. I have removed the PROD and added a few extra sources. Blythwood (talk) 12:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• I added some more authoritative sources, such as Time, The Atlantic, the Guardian, The Economist, which I trust helps establish notability. Mdmcginn (talk) 22:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]