Talk:Mary Lambert (director)

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved. There is no consensus primary topic. Too early to assess the long-term significance of the young singer. wbm1058 (talk) 17:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Mary Lambert → Mary Lambert (director)
• Mary Lambert (disambiguation) → Mary Lambert

– Singer has received four times as many views in the last 90 days,[1] and after looking at "what links here", some of the links are actually intended for the singer. In addition, the director's article has four references; the singer's has 55. Unreal7 (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – disambig page makes more sense than primarytopic here. Dicklyon (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Move the director, but move
  WP:TWODABS situation, so a hat note will be more effective than sending everyone to a dab page.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Switch primary topic to the singer and just list the director in a hatnote, per
  WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Oppose a primary topic. I think the singer could be argued to be getting hits because of recentism, and they both appear to have decent claims of long-term significance. Support a dab page. Nohomersryan (talk) 14:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• No preference for whether or not
  Chase (talk | contributions) 03:36, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Additionally support move from
    Chase (talk | contributions) 19:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Switch primary topic per Cuchullain and Amakuru. Recentism is not an issue here because the long-term significance of the singer is higher than that of the director.
  SSTflyer 07:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]