Talk:Mount Field National Park

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Tasmania Low‑importance Mount Field National Park is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Protected areas Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Victoria (state) may be able to help!

Cheyne wrote about the Mt Field article:

Unfortunately, this article is rubbish and should be deleted and replaced with articles for each of the mountains mentioned, and perhaps others within the Mt Field National Park. There is no "Mt Field", per se, apart from Mt Field National Park. Mt Field East is 10.5 km away from Mt Field West; they are different mountains in the same park and in the same area of high country that is not named as a "range" (although the Rodway Range is a small range between Mts Field East & West). The Wellington Range has nothing whatsoever to do with this area. Mt Field West is 65 km straight-line distance from Mt Wellington!

Unfortunately I am not familiar with the area. What do folks think we should do? cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 14:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is part of the wellington range. This is evidenced by the rock type among other things. Collins Cap, Tressle Mountain, Collins Bonnet etc are in between this and mt wellington.

talk) 01:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

• Do not support - we (?) in the tas project try to keep - where possible - geographical features separate from nat park articles - if possible - from what I have seen so far that is.. is what I first wrote.
• However on reading the relayed message - I would suggest that an example might be West Coast Range is what I did with that issue of multiple mountains requiring articles... they link from it
• Regardless of whether the article is rubbish - I do not agree with deleting - have it - like the West Coast Range article - as a lead in and link to the other articles - very easy to do..

The point is the larger/wider innacurate term of Mt Field NP is what most enquiries would go to first - I would challenge anyone to name all west coast range mountains in correct order from the south - the larger titles broader name is very useful lead in for the less familiar reader...

Just my 2 bobs worth

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that

Picture of the day

Lake Seal in

Noodle snacks

Archive – More featured pictures...