Talk:Raymond Sackler
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120629053633/http://www.tau.ac.il/president/sackler-biophysics.html to http://www.tau.ac.il/president/sackler-biophysics.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
What a ridiculous promotional article this is.
Here is a guy who made $14 billion pedaling the drug that has singlehandedly caused the most damage to American society, and yet we're treated to his hagiography? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.241.45 (talk) 06:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Has Wikipedia fallen victim to “reputation laundering”?
What some call philanthropy, others, such as Stanford University ethics professor Rob Reich, call “reputation laundering”.
Reviewing this article is seems Wikipedia fallen victim to this effort?
Bjornte (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Philanthropy section
The Philanthropy section is full of reference to uncited philanthropic actions, in fact, the only cited content here is about the rejection of Sackler philanthropy. Should this section be trimmed or ammended? Generally, I'd propose removing all unsourced information. I don't see a good reason to keep it on, unless there are solid