Talk:Sybil Elgar

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

to be honest i cant really be arsed to do anything about it. I was in the process of aquiring the expressd permission from NAS to republish the specific article. But as the page does not neet the militia style tactics of control set out by the high and mighty wikipedia guys, well, i give in. She was a great person, most people know that, some do not, that is a shame...........

Go forth and dissolve....

i will contact ppl regarding the transfer of this article and thae talk to someone at nas.

danke schon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imperfect Editor (talk • contribs)

The does not establish

Wikipedia is not a discriminate collection of information

, it is an encyclopedia and has policies for inclusion. An encyclopedia full of two-sentence articles would be useless. Do not say you weren't warned, the new article creation page clearly states "Articles that do not cite reliable published sources will be deleted" in big bold letters.

If the person was indeed notable then the article ought to convey that; alternatively, you could have explained that on this talk page. The apologist comment you added, however, helps nobody. -- intgr 13:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]